From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexei Starovoitov Subject: Re: [PATCH net-net 0/4] Increase the limit of tuntap queues Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:43:06 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1416327778-17716-1-git-send-email-pagupta@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "David S. Miller" , Jason Wang , mst@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, Veaceslav Falico , Eric Dumazet , Vladislav Yasevich , Jerry Chu , wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com.pnq.redhat.com, Pavel Emelianov , Tom Herbert , bhutchings@solarflare.com, xii@google.com, Stephen Hemminger , =?UTF-8?B?SmnFmcOtIFDDrXJrbw==?= , sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com To: Pankaj Gupta Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1416327778-17716-1-git-send-email-pagupta@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > Networking under KVM works best if we allocate a per-vCPU rx and tx > queue in a virtual NIC. This requires a per-vCPU queue on the host side. ... > I have done some testing to find out any regression and with sample program > which creates tun/tap for single queue / multiqueue device and it seems to be > working fine. I will also post the performance numbers. Sounds quite exciting. please share recommended setup (queue assignments) and performance gains you're seeing.