Re: [PATCH] can: mcp251x: not correct register address

[Tomas Krcka <tomas.krcka@nkgroup.cz>]

You are right, sorry for that. I'll send v2.

Thanks.

2015-05-30 9:41 GMT+02:00 Jakub Kicinski <moorray3@wp.pl>:
> On Mon, 25 May 2015 08:57:48 +0200, Tomas Krcka wrote:
>> This patch corrects addresses of acceptance filters.
>> These registers are not in use, but values should be correct.
>> Tested with MCP2515 and am3352 and also checked datasheets for MCP2515
>> and MCP2510.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Krcka <tomas.krcka@nkgroup.cz>
>>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c |    9 +++++----
>>   1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c
>> index bf63fee..c1a95a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c
>> @@ -190,10 +190,11 @@
>>   #define RXBEID0_OFF 4
>>   #define RXBDLC_OFF  5
>>   #define RXBDAT_OFF  6
>> -#define RXFSIDH(n) ((n) * 4)
>> -#define RXFSIDL(n) ((n) * 4 + 1)
>> -#define RXFEID8(n) ((n) * 4 + 2)
>> -#define RXFEID0(n) ((n) * 4 + 3)
>> +#define RXFSID(n) ((n < 3) ? 0 : 4)
>> +#define RXFSIDH(n) ((n) * 4 + RXFSID(n))
>> +#define RXFSIDL(n) ((n) * 4 + 1 + RXFSID(n))
>> +#define RXFEID8(n) ((n) * 4 + 2 + RXFSID(n))
>> +#define RXFEID0(n) ((n) * 4 + 3 + RXFSID(n))
>>   #define RXMSIDH(n) ((n) * 4 + 0x20)
>>   #define RXMSIDL(n) ((n) * 4 + 0x21)
>>   #define RXMEID8(n) ((n) * 4 + 0x22)
>
> I think your patch was corrupted.  It doesn't apply because you have
> extra space before each surviving #define.