From: Michael Evans <mjevans1983@gmail.com>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: regression in 4.20.0: physical to VETH (LXC) network bridge (unsure if cgroups is related)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:59:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABp5QGLyBwLJoEcKC=BNKfgUuuA46TQ58Luw-8M4PwcSE5Wumw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I have since reverted to the working LTS kernel image offered by Arch
Linux (4.19.13), but am willing to re-test / gather data additional
data on a couple lower-use time periods during the week.
After updating to Linux 4.20.0 (along with a full system update
otherwise) my BRIDGED network connections to some LXC containers
ceased working.
Attempting to troubleshoot this issue also produced extremely odd
results, which I think offhand MIGHT have caused network packets to
fill up some kind of memory buffer instead of being relaid or dropped;
there are some additional details at the serverfault and LXC bugs that
I filed, as it was initially (and still is) unclear where the actual
issue is.
-
At this time I am unsure if it is related to netdev (bridge, veth),
cgroups, or some changed default that should now be configured in a
way that is different to previous defaults.
https://serverfault.com/questions/947848/linux-bridge-broken-after-upgrade-out-of-ideas-places-to-look-now-4-20-0-arc
https://github.com/lxc/lxc/issues/2769
Also now filed: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202235
* It is NOT related to IP forwarding. This is a BRIDGED connection,
not a routed one, and it works on older kernels without that enabled.
* physical network to bridge works (and will stay connected for a few
min after later troubleshooting steps, even if ARP caches / ping flake
out and stop responding)
* VETH (within LXC) can ping the the host IP on the bridge (but not
the gateway, the host can before this step) if manually assigned a
static address. Doing this seems to cause general instability and a
timed out SSH session. This lead me to reboot between each round of
testing to ensure I had a clean slate to start with.
I went over the major settings that I did check in the other two bug
reports, but I'm open to checking other values and/or performing
different kinds of tests occasionally over a given week. Responses
won't be immediate but I'll try to check on this frequently over the
next two weeks.
reply other threads:[~2019-01-12 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABp5QGLyBwLJoEcKC=BNKfgUuuA46TQ58Luw-8M4PwcSE5Wumw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=mjevans1983@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).