From: John Heffner <johnwheffner@gmail.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A SACK block to the left of the ACK? (with ptr to raw trace)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 14:21:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABrhC0kFEMOR7LTMFS4ktEgW0w+1v_vSP8xU_Vh8+iKmtEUb4A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536D11A0.6050400@hp.com>
I didn't actually look at the trace, but offhand this sounds like
D-SACK. (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2883.txt)
-John
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> wrote:
> Hi -
>
> As part of looking at a customer issue, I've been running some netperf
> TCP_RR between a pair of instances running 3.2.0 with whatever stuff
> Canonical have backported into their -60 version. While looking at packet
> traces I've seen the following odd SACK:
>
> 08:14:40.329583 IP 15.126.222.122.48130 > 10.0.0.3.12345: Flags [.], ack
> 63734, win 457, options [nop,nop,TS val 14282026 ecr 14255813,nop,nop,sack 1
> {63716:63717}], length 0
>
> I don't think that this "to the left of the ACK" SACK block actually caused
> anything heinous to happen but it does look odd and so I thought I might
> mention it to see if anyone else has seen it or if perhaps it is a known
> issue fixed in a later kernel. The full tcpdump from one side is up at:
>
> ftp://ftp.netperf.org/rr_16.pcap.gz
>
> The netperf running was:
>
> ubuntu@zpet-netperf-east-1-vm01:~$ netperf -l 60 -H zPet_NetPerf-East-2-vm01
> -t TCP_RR -- -b 16 -D -P ,12345
>
> So TCP_NODELAY was set (-D), and there were upwards of 17 segments in flight
> at any one time (-b 16 - 16 added to the default of one).
>
> The trace was taken at zPet_NetPerf-East-2-vm01. As you might have guessed
> there is NAT involved - in both directions actually. The node(s) on which
> this NAT is happening are running a 3.5.0-44 kernel.
>
> Here is one being sent from the side where the trace was being taken:
>
> 08:15:01.137718 IP 10.0.0.3.12345 > 15.126.222.122.48130: Flags [.], ack
> 218871, win 453, options [nop,nop,TS val 14261016 ecr 14287228,nop,nop,sack
> 1 {218854:218855}], length 0
>
> Which I suppose rules-out some odd NAT bug as the source of the "to the left
> of the ACK" SACKs since that was captured pre-NAT.
>
> happy benchmarking,
>
> rick jones
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-09 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-09 17:34 A SACK block to the left of the ACK? (with ptr to raw trace) Rick Jones
2014-05-09 18:21 ` John Heffner [this message]
2014-05-09 18:25 ` Rick Jones
2014-05-09 19:18 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABrhC0kFEMOR7LTMFS4ktEgW0w+1v_vSP8xU_Vh8+iKmtEUb4A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=johnwheffner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).