netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation
@ 2023-12-05  8:02 Heng Qi
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/5] virtio-net: returns whether napi is complete Heng Qi
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, virtualization
  Cc: jasowang, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem, hawk,
	john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo

Now, virtio-net already supports per-queue moderation parameter
setting. Based on this, we use the linux dimlib to support
dynamic coalescing moderation for virtio-net.

Due to some scheduling issues, we only support and test the rx dim.

Some test results:

I. Sockperf UDP
=================================================
1. Env
rxq_0 with affinity to cpu_0.

2. Cmd
client: taskset -c 0 sockperf tp -p 8989 -i $IP -t 10 -m 16B
server: taskset -c 0 sockperf sr -p 8989

3. Result
dim off: 1143277.00 rxpps, throughput 17.844 MBps, cpu is 100%.
dim on:  1124161.00 rxpps, throughput 17.610 MBps, cpu is 83.5%.
=================================================

II. Redis
=================================================
1. Env
There are 8 rxqs, and rxq_i with affinity to cpu_i.

2. Result
When all cpus are 100%, ops/sec of memtier_benchmark client is
dim off:  978437.23
dim on:  1143638.28
=================================================

III. Nginx
=================================================
1. Env
There are 8 rxqs and rxq_i with affinity to cpu_i.

2. Result
When all cpus are 100%, requests/sec of wrk client is
dim off:  877931.67
dim on:  1019160.31
=================================================

IV. Latency of sockperf udp
=================================================
1. Rx cmd
taskset -c 0 sockperf sr -p 8989

2. Tx cmd
taskset -c 0 sockperf pp -i ${ip} -p 8989 -t 10

After running this cmd 5 times and averaging the results,

3. Result
dim off: 17.7735 usec
dim on:  18.0110 usec
=================================================

Changelog:
v5->v6:
- Add patch(4/5): spin lock for ctrl cmd access
- Patch(5/5):
   - Use spin lock and cancel_work_sync to synchronize

v4->v5:
- Patch(4/4):
   - Fix possible synchronization issues with cancel_work_sync.
   - Reduce if/else nesting levels

v3->v4:
- Patch(5/5): drop.

v2->v3:
- Patch(4/5): some minor modifications.

v1->v2:
- Patch(2/5): a minor fix.
- Patch(4/5):
   - improve the judgment of dim switch conditions.
   - Cancel the work when vq reset. 
- Patch(5/5): drop the tx dim implementation.

Heng Qi (5):
  virtio-net: returns whether napi is complete
  virtio-net: separate rx/tx coalescing moderation cmds
  virtio-net: extract virtqueue coalescig cmd for reuse
  virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
  virtio-net: support rx netdim

 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 346 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 295 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v6 1/5] virtio-net: returns whether napi is complete
  2023-12-05  8:02 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05  8:02 ` Heng Qi
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/5] virtio-net: separate rx/tx coalescing moderation cmds Heng Qi
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, virtualization
  Cc: jasowang, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem, hawk,
	john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo

rx netdim needs to count the traffic during a complete napi process,
and start updating and comparing samples to make decisions after
the napi ends. Let virtqueue_napi_complete() return true if napi is done,
otherwise vice versa.

Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index d16f592c2061..0ad2894e6a5e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void virtqueue_napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *napi,
 	}
 }
 
-static void virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
+static bool virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
 				    struct virtqueue *vq, int processed)
 {
 	int opaque;
@@ -440,9 +440,13 @@ static void virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
 	if (napi_complete_done(napi, processed)) {
 		if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(vq, opaque)))
 			virtqueue_napi_schedule(napi, vq);
+		else
+			return true;
 	} else {
 		virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
 	}
+
+	return false;
 }
 
 static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v6 2/5] virtio-net: separate rx/tx coalescing moderation cmds
  2023-12-05  8:02 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation Heng Qi
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/5] virtio-net: returns whether napi is complete Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05  8:02 ` Heng Qi
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/5] virtio-net: extract virtqueue coalescig cmd for reuse Heng Qi
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, virtualization
  Cc: jasowang, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem, hawk,
	john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo

This patch separates the rx and tx global coalescing moderation
commands to support netdim switches in subsequent patches.

Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 0ad2894e6a5e..0285301caf78 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -3266,10 +3266,10 @@ static int virtnet_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *dev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
-				       struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
+static int virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+					  struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
 {
-	struct scatterlist sgs_tx, sgs_rx;
+	struct scatterlist sgs_tx;
 	int i;
 
 	vi->ctrl->coal_tx.tx_usecs = cpu_to_le32(ec->tx_coalesce_usecs);
@@ -3289,6 +3289,15 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 		vi->sq[i].intr_coal.max_packets = ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames;
 	}
 
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+					  struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
+{
+	struct scatterlist sgs_rx;
+	int i;
+
 	vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_usecs = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_coalesce_usecs);
 	vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_max_packets = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
 	sg_init_one(&sgs_rx, &vi->ctrl->coal_rx, sizeof(vi->ctrl->coal_rx));
@@ -3309,6 +3318,22 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+				       struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_cmds(vi, ec);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	err = virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(vi, ec);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 					 u16 vqn, u32 max_usecs, u32 max_packets)
 {
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v6 3/5] virtio-net: extract virtqueue coalescig cmd for reuse
  2023-12-05  8:02 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation Heng Qi
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/5] virtio-net: returns whether napi is complete Heng Qi
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/5] virtio-net: separate rx/tx coalescing moderation cmds Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05  8:02 ` Heng Qi
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access Heng Qi
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 5/5] virtio-net: support rx netdim Heng Qi
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, virtualization
  Cc: jasowang, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem, hawk,
	john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo

Extract commands to set virtqueue coalescing parameters for reuse
by ethtool -Q, vq resize and netdim.

Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 0285301caf78..69fe09e99b3c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -2849,6 +2849,58 @@ static void virtnet_cpu_notif_remove(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 					    &vi->node_dead);
 }
 
+static int virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+					 u16 vqn, u32 max_usecs, u32 max_packets)
+{
+	struct scatterlist sgs;
+
+	vi->ctrl->coal_vq.vqn = cpu_to_le16(vqn);
+	vi->ctrl->coal_vq.coal.max_usecs = cpu_to_le32(max_usecs);
+	vi->ctrl->coal_vq.coal.max_packets = cpu_to_le32(max_packets);
+	sg_init_one(&sgs, &vi->ctrl->coal_vq, sizeof(vi->ctrl->coal_vq));
+
+	if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL,
+				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET,
+				  &sgs))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+					    u16 queue, u32 max_usecs,
+					    u32 max_packets)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, rxq2vq(queue),
+					    max_usecs, max_packets);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs = max_usecs;
+	vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets = max_packets;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+					    u16 queue, u32 max_usecs,
+					    u32 max_packets)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, txq2vq(queue),
+					    max_usecs, max_packets);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs = max_usecs;
+	vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets = max_packets;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void virtnet_get_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
 				  struct ethtool_ringparam *ring,
 				  struct kernel_ethtool_ringparam *kernel_ring,
@@ -2906,14 +2958,11 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
 			 * through the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET command, or, if the driver
 			 * did not set any TX coalescing parameters, to 0.
 			 */
-			err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, txq2vq(i),
-							    vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
-							    vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
+			err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
+							       vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
+							       vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
-
-			vi->sq[i].intr_coal.max_usecs = vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs;
-			vi->sq[i].intr_coal.max_packets = vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets;
 		}
 
 		if (ring->rx_pending != rx_pending) {
@@ -2922,14 +2971,11 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
 				return err;
 
 			/* The reason is same as the transmit virtqueue reset */
-			err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, rxq2vq(i),
-							    vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs,
-							    vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets);
+			err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
+							       vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs,
+							       vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
-
-			vi->rq[i].intr_coal.max_usecs = vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs;
-			vi->rq[i].intr_coal.max_packets = vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -3334,48 +3380,24 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
-					 u16 vqn, u32 max_usecs, u32 max_packets)
-{
-	struct scatterlist sgs;
-
-	vi->ctrl->coal_vq.vqn = cpu_to_le16(vqn);
-	vi->ctrl->coal_vq.coal.max_usecs = cpu_to_le32(max_usecs);
-	vi->ctrl->coal_vq.coal.max_packets = cpu_to_le32(max_packets);
-	sg_init_one(&sgs, &vi->ctrl->coal_vq, sizeof(vi->ctrl->coal_vq));
-
-	if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL,
-				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET,
-				  &sgs))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 					  struct ethtool_coalesce *ec,
 					  u16 queue)
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, rxq2vq(queue),
-					    ec->rx_coalesce_usecs,
-					    ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
+	err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
+					       ec->rx_coalesce_usecs,
+					       ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs = ec->rx_coalesce_usecs;
-	vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets = ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames;
-
-	err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, txq2vq(queue),
-					    ec->tx_coalesce_usecs,
-					    ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
+	err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
+					       ec->tx_coalesce_usecs,
+					       ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs = ec->tx_coalesce_usecs;
-	vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets = ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
  2023-12-05  8:02 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation Heng Qi
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/5] virtio-net: extract virtqueue coalescig cmd for reuse Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05  8:02 ` Heng Qi
  2023-12-05  8:35   ` Jason Wang
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 5/5] virtio-net: support rx netdim Heng Qi
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, virtualization
  Cc: jasowang, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem, hawk,
	john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo

Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work. Therefore, treating
ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
the basis for the next patch.

Since ndo_set_rx_mode is in an atomic environment(netif_addr_lock_bh),
the mutex lock is excluded.

And I tried putting the spin lock in virtnet_send_command, but
virtnet_rx_dim_work and virtnet_set_per_queue_coalesce access to
shared variables prevent this.

cancel_work_sync and virtnet_rx_dim_work are from the next patch.

Please review. Thanks a lot!

Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 69fe09e99b3c..0dd09c4f8d89 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
 
 	struct control_buf *ctrl;
 
+	/* The lock to synchronize the access to contrl cmd */
+	spinlock_t ctrl_lock;
+
 	/* Ethtool settings */
 	u8 duplex;
 	u32 speed;
@@ -2520,13 +2523,16 @@ static int virtnet_set_mac_address(struct net_device *dev, void *p)
 
 	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR)) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, addr->sa_data, dev->addr_len);
+		spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
 					  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET, &sg)) {
 			dev_warn(&vdev->dev,
 				 "Failed to set mac address by vq command.\n");
 			ret = -EINVAL;
+			spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 			goto out;
 		}
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	} else if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) &&
 		   !virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
 		unsigned int i;
@@ -2589,9 +2595,11 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev,
 static void virtnet_ack_link_announce(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 {
 	rtnl_lock();
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ANNOUNCE,
 				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ANNOUNCE_ACK, NULL))
 		dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev, "Failed to ack link announce.\n");
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	rtnl_unlock();
 }
 
@@ -2603,6 +2611,7 @@ static int _virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
 	if (!vi->has_cvq || !virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ))
 		return 0;
 
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	vi->ctrl->mq.virtqueue_pairs = cpu_to_virtio16(vi->vdev, queue_pairs);
 	sg_init_one(&sg, &vi->ctrl->mq, sizeof(vi->ctrl->mq));
 
@@ -2610,6 +2619,7 @@ static int _virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
 				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET, &sg)) {
 		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Fail to set num of queue pairs to %d\n",
 			 queue_pairs);
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	} else {
 		vi->curr_queue_pairs = queue_pairs;
@@ -2618,6 +2628,7 @@ static int _virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
 			schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
 	}
 
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -2662,6 +2673,7 @@ static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
 	if (!virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX))
 		return;
 
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	vi->ctrl->promisc = ((dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC) != 0);
 	vi->ctrl->allmulti = ((dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI) != 0);
 
@@ -2679,6 +2691,7 @@ static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
 		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Failed to %sable allmulti mode.\n",
 			 vi->ctrl->allmulti ? "en" : "dis");
 
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	uc_count = netdev_uc_count(dev);
 	mc_count = netdev_mc_count(dev);
 	/* MAC filter - use one buffer for both lists */
@@ -2710,10 +2723,12 @@ static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
 	sg_set_buf(&sg[1], mac_data,
 		   sizeof(mac_data->entries) + (mc_count * ETH_ALEN));
 
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
 				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_TABLE_SET, sg))
 		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Failed to set MAC filter table.\n");
 
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	kfree(buf);
 }
 
@@ -2723,12 +2738,15 @@ static int virtnet_vlan_rx_add_vid(struct net_device *dev,
 	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct scatterlist sg;
 
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	vi->ctrl->vid = cpu_to_virtio16(vi->vdev, vid);
 	sg_init_one(&sg, &vi->ctrl->vid, sizeof(vi->ctrl->vid));
 
 	if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_VLAN,
 				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_VLAN_ADD, &sg))
 		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Failed to add VLAN ID %d.\n", vid);
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -2738,12 +2756,15 @@ static int virtnet_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev,
 	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct scatterlist sg;
 
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	vi->ctrl->vid = cpu_to_virtio16(vi->vdev, vid);
 	sg_init_one(&sg, &vi->ctrl->vid, sizeof(vi->ctrl->vid));
 
 	if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_VLAN,
 				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_VLAN_DEL, &sg))
 		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Failed to kill VLAN ID %d.\n", vid);
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -2958,11 +2979,15 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
 			 * through the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET command, or, if the driver
 			 * did not set any TX coalescing parameters, to 0.
 			 */
+			spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 			err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
 							       vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
 							       vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
-			if (err)
+			if (err) {
+				spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 				return err;
+			}
+			spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		}
 
 		if (ring->rx_pending != rx_pending) {
@@ -2971,11 +2996,15 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
 				return err;
 
 			/* The reason is same as the transmit virtqueue reset */
+			spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 			err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
 							       vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs,
 							       vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets);
-			if (err)
+			if (err) {
+				spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 				return err;
+			}
+			spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -2991,6 +3020,7 @@ static bool virtnet_commit_rss_command(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 	/* prepare sgs */
 	sg_init_table(sgs, 4);
 
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	sg_buf_size = offsetof(struct virtio_net_ctrl_rss, indirection_table);
 	sg_set_buf(&sgs[0], &vi->ctrl->rss, sg_buf_size);
 
@@ -3008,8 +3038,12 @@ static bool virtnet_commit_rss_command(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 				  vi->has_rss ? VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_RSS_CONFIG
 				  : VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_HASH_CONFIG, sgs)) {
 		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "VIRTIONET issue with committing RSS sgs\n");
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		return false;
 	}
+
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -3318,14 +3352,17 @@ static int virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 	struct scatterlist sgs_tx;
 	int i;
 
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	vi->ctrl->coal_tx.tx_usecs = cpu_to_le32(ec->tx_coalesce_usecs);
 	vi->ctrl->coal_tx.tx_max_packets = cpu_to_le32(ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
 	sg_init_one(&sgs_tx, &vi->ctrl->coal_tx, sizeof(vi->ctrl->coal_tx));
 
 	if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL,
 				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET,
-				  &sgs_tx))
+				  &sgs_tx)) {
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	/* Save parameters */
 	vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs = ec->tx_coalesce_usecs;
@@ -3334,6 +3371,7 @@ static int virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 		vi->sq[i].intr_coal.max_usecs = ec->tx_coalesce_usecs;
 		vi->sq[i].intr_coal.max_packets = ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames;
 	}
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -3344,14 +3382,17 @@ static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 	struct scatterlist sgs_rx;
 	int i;
 
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_usecs = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_coalesce_usecs);
 	vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_max_packets = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
 	sg_init_one(&sgs_rx, &vi->ctrl->coal_rx, sizeof(vi->ctrl->coal_rx));
 
 	if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL,
 				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET,
-				  &sgs_rx))
+				  &sgs_rx)) {
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	/* Save parameters */
 	vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs = ec->rx_coalesce_usecs;
@@ -3361,6 +3402,8 @@ static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 		vi->rq[i].intr_coal.max_packets = ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames;
 	}
 
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3386,17 +3429,24 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 {
 	int err;
 
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
 					       ec->rx_coalesce_usecs,
 					       ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		return err;
+	}
 
 	err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
 					       ec->tx_coalesce_usecs,
 					       ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		return err;
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -3733,6 +3783,8 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 static int virtnet_set_guest_offloads(struct virtnet_info *vi, u64 offloads)
 {
 	struct scatterlist sg;
+
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	vi->ctrl->offloads = cpu_to_virtio64(vi->vdev, offloads);
 
 	sg_init_one(&sg, &vi->ctrl->offloads, sizeof(vi->ctrl->offloads));
@@ -3740,9 +3792,11 @@ static int virtnet_set_guest_offloads(struct virtnet_info *vi, u64 offloads)
 	if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS,
 				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS_SET, &sg)) {
 		dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev, "Fail to set guest offload.\n");
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -4525,6 +4579,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 
 	INIT_WORK(&vi->config_work, virtnet_config_changed_work);
 	spin_lock_init(&vi->refill_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 
 	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
 		vi->mergeable_rx_bufs = true;
@@ -4669,13 +4724,16 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 		struct scatterlist sg;
 
 		sg_init_one(&sg, dev->dev_addr, dev->addr_len);
+		spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
 					  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET, &sg)) {
 			pr_debug("virtio_net: setting MAC address failed\n");
+			spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 			rtnl_unlock();
 			err = -EINVAL;
 			goto free_unregister_netdev;
 		}
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	}
 
 	rtnl_unlock();
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v6 5/5] virtio-net: support rx netdim
  2023-12-05  8:02 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation Heng Qi
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05  8:02 ` Heng Qi
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, virtualization
  Cc: jasowang, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem, hawk,
	john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo

By comparing the traffic information in the complete napi processes,
let the virtio-net driver automatically adjust the coalescing
moderation parameters of each receive queue.

Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
v5->v5:
- Use spin lock and cancel_work_sync to synchronize

v4->v5:
- Fix possible synchronization issues using cancel_work().
- Reduce if/else nesting levels

v2->v3:
- Some minor modifications.

v1->v2:
- Improved the judgment of dim switch conditions.
- Cancel the work when vq reset.

 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 167 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 0dd09c4f8d89..882761c64db4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/average.h>
 #include <linux/filter.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/dim.h>
 #include <net/route.h>
 #include <net/xdp.h>
 #include <net/net_failover.h>
@@ -172,6 +173,17 @@ struct receive_queue {
 
 	struct virtnet_rq_stats stats;
 
+	/* The number of rx notifications */
+	u16 calls;
+
+	/* Is dynamic interrupt moderation enabled? */
+	bool dim_enabled;
+
+	/* Dynamic Interrupt Moderation */
+	struct dim dim;
+
+	u32 packets_in_napi;
+
 	struct virtnet_interrupt_coalesce intr_coal;
 
 	/* Chain pages by the private ptr. */
@@ -308,6 +320,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
 	u8 duplex;
 	u32 speed;
 
+	/* Is rx dynamic interrupt moderation enabled? */
+	bool rx_dim_enabled;
+
 	/* Interrupt coalescing settings */
 	struct virtnet_interrupt_coalesce intr_coal_tx;
 	struct virtnet_interrupt_coalesce intr_coal_rx;
@@ -2004,6 +2019,7 @@ static void skb_recv_done(struct virtqueue *rvq)
 	struct virtnet_info *vi = rvq->vdev->priv;
 	struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[vq2rxq(rvq)];
 
+	rq->calls++;
 	virtqueue_napi_schedule(&rq->napi, rvq);
 }
 
@@ -2144,6 +2160,26 @@ static void virtnet_poll_cleantx(struct receive_queue *rq)
 	}
 }
 
+static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work);
+
+static void virtnet_rx_dim_update(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
+{
+	struct dim_sample cur_sample = {};
+
+	if (!rq->packets_in_napi)
+		return;
+
+	u64_stats_update_begin(&rq->stats.syncp);
+	dim_update_sample(rq->calls,
+			  u64_stats_read(&rq->stats.packets),
+			  u64_stats_read(&rq->stats.bytes),
+			  &cur_sample);
+	u64_stats_update_end(&rq->stats.syncp);
+
+	net_dim(&rq->dim, cur_sample);
+	rq->packets_in_napi = 0;
+}
+
 static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 {
 	struct receive_queue *rq =
@@ -2152,17 +2188,22 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 	struct send_queue *sq;
 	unsigned int received;
 	unsigned int xdp_xmit = 0;
+	bool napi_complete;
 
 	virtnet_poll_cleantx(rq);
 
 	received = virtnet_receive(rq, budget, &xdp_xmit);
+	rq->packets_in_napi += received;
 
 	if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_REDIR)
 		xdp_do_flush();
 
 	/* Out of packets? */
-	if (received < budget)
-		virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, rq->vq, received);
+	if (received < budget) {
+		napi_complete = virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, rq->vq, received);
+		if (napi_complete && rq->dim_enabled)
+			virtnet_rx_dim_update(vi, rq);
+	}
 
 	if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_TX) {
 		sq = virtnet_xdp_get_sq(vi);
@@ -2233,8 +2274,11 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
 	disable_delayed_refill(vi);
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
 
-	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
+	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
 		virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i);
+		cancel_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].dim.work);
+	}
+
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -2396,8 +2440,10 @@ static int virtnet_rx_resize(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 
 	qindex = rq - vi->rq;
 
-	if (running)
+	if (running) {
 		napi_disable(&rq->napi);
+		cancel_work_sync(&rq->dim.work);
+	}
 
 	err = virtqueue_resize(rq->vq, ring_num, virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf);
 	if (err)
@@ -2652,8 +2698,10 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
 	/* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
 		virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i);
+		cancel_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].dim.work);
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -2905,20 +2953,25 @@ static int virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
-					    u16 queue, u32 max_usecs,
-					    u32 max_packets)
+static int virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+					     u16 queue, u32 max_usecs,
+					     u32 max_packets)
 {
 	int err;
 
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, txq2vq(queue),
 					    max_usecs, max_packets);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		return err;
+	}
 
 	vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs = max_usecs;
 	vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets = max_packets;
 
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -2935,9 +2988,6 @@ static void virtnet_get_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
 	ring->tx_pending = virtqueue_get_vring_size(vi->sq[0].vq);
 }
 
-static int virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
-					 u16 vqn, u32 max_usecs, u32 max_packets);
-
 static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
 				 struct ethtool_ringparam *ring,
 				 struct kernel_ethtool_ringparam *kernel_ring,
@@ -2979,15 +3029,11 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
 			 * through the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET command, or, if the driver
 			 * did not set any TX coalescing parameters, to 0.
 			 */
-			spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
-			err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
-							       vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
-							       vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
-			if (err) {
-				spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+			err = virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_vq_cmds(vi, i,
+								vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
+								vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
+			if (err)
 				return err;
-			}
-			spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 		}
 
 		if (ring->rx_pending != rx_pending) {
@@ -3379,9 +3425,34 @@ static int virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 					  struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
 {
+	bool rx_ctrl_dim_on = !!ec->use_adaptive_rx_coalesce;
 	struct scatterlist sgs_rx;
 	int i;
 
+	if (rx_ctrl_dim_on && !virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_VQ_NOTF_COAL))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (rx_ctrl_dim_on && (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs != vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs ||
+			       ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames != vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (rx_ctrl_dim_on && !vi->rx_dim_enabled) {
+		vi->rx_dim_enabled = true;
+		for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
+			vi->rq[i].dim_enabled = true;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (!rx_ctrl_dim_on && vi->rx_dim_enabled) {
+		vi->rx_dim_enabled = false;
+		for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
+			vi->rq[i].dim_enabled = false;
+	}
+
+	/* Since the per-queue coalescing params can be set,
+	 * we need apply the global new params even if they
+	 * are not updated.
+	 */
 	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
 	vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_usecs = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_coalesce_usecs);
 	vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_max_packets = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
@@ -3394,7 +3465,6 @@ static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	/* Save parameters */
 	vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs = ec->rx_coalesce_usecs;
 	vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets = ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames;
 	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
@@ -3423,13 +3493,36 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
-					  struct ethtool_coalesce *ec,
-					  u16 queue)
+static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+					     struct ethtool_coalesce *ec,
+					     u16 queue)
 {
+	bool rx_ctrl_dim_on = !!ec->use_adaptive_rx_coalesce;
+	bool cur_rx_dim = vi->rq[queue].dim_enabled;
+	u32 max_usecs, max_packets;
 	int err;
 
 	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+	max_usecs = vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs;
+	max_packets = vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets;
+	if (rx_ctrl_dim_on && (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs != max_usecs ||
+			       ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames != max_packets)) {
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (rx_ctrl_dim_on && !cur_rx_dim) {
+		vi->rq[queue].dim_enabled = true;
+		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (!rx_ctrl_dim_on && cur_rx_dim)
+		vi->rq[queue].dim_enabled = false;
+
+	/* If no params are updated, userspace ethtool will
+	 * reject the modification.
+	 */
 	err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
 					       ec->rx_coalesce_usecs,
 					       ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
@@ -3438,19 +3531,56 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 		return err;
 	}
 
-	err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
-					       ec->tx_coalesce_usecs,
-					       ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
-	if (err) {
-		spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+					  struct ethtool_coalesce *ec,
+					  u16 queue)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_vq_cmds(vi, ec, queue);
+	if (err)
 		return err;
-	}
 
-	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+	err = virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_vq_cmds(vi, queue,
+						ec->tx_coalesce_usecs,
+						ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
+	struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
+			struct receive_queue, dim);
+	struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
+	struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
+	struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
+	int qnum = rq - vi->rq, err;
+
+	update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode, dim->profile_ix);
+	spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+	if (update_moder.usec != vi->rq[qnum].intr_coal.max_usecs ||
+	    update_moder.pkts != vi->rq[qnum].intr_coal.max_packets) {
+		err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
+						       update_moder.usec,
+						       update_moder.pkts);
+		if (err)
+			pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
+				 dev->name, (int)(rq - vi->rq));
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+	dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
+}
+
 static int virtnet_coal_params_supported(struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
 {
 	/* usecs coalescing is supported only if VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTF_COAL
@@ -3532,6 +3662,7 @@ static int virtnet_get_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
 		ec->tx_coalesce_usecs = vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs;
 		ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames = vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets;
 		ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames = vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets;
+		ec->use_adaptive_rx_coalesce = vi->rx_dim_enabled;
 	} else {
 		ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames = 1;
 
@@ -3589,6 +3720,7 @@ static int virtnet_get_per_queue_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
 		ec->tx_coalesce_usecs = vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs;
 		ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames = vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets;
 		ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames = vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets;
+		ec->use_adaptive_rx_coalesce = vi->rq[queue].dim_enabled;
 	} else {
 		ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames = 1;
 
@@ -3714,7 +3846,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_rxnfc *info)
 
 static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops = {
 	.supported_coalesce_params = ETHTOOL_COALESCE_MAX_FRAMES |
-		ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USECS,
+		ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USECS | ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USE_ADAPTIVE_RX,
 	.get_drvinfo = virtnet_get_drvinfo,
 	.get_link = ethtool_op_get_link,
 	.get_ringparam = virtnet_get_ringparam,
@@ -4308,6 +4440,9 @@ static int virtnet_alloc_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 					 virtnet_poll_tx,
 					 napi_tx ? napi_weight : 0);
 
+		INIT_WORK(&vi->rq[i].dim.work, virtnet_rx_dim_work);
+		vi->rq[i].dim.mode = DIM_CQ_PERIOD_MODE_START_FROM_EQE;
+
 		sg_init_table(vi->rq[i].sg, ARRAY_SIZE(vi->rq[i].sg));
 		ewma_pkt_len_init(&vi->rq[i].mrg_avg_pkt_len);
 		sg_init_table(vi->sq[i].sg, ARRAY_SIZE(vi->sq[i].sg));
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
  2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05  8:35   ` Jason Wang
  2023-12-05 11:05     ` Heng Qi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2023-12-05  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Heng Qi
  Cc: netdev, virtualization, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet,
	davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.

Can you explain why?

> Therefore, treating
> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
> the basis for the next patch.

Let's don't do that. Reasons are:

1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq

Thanks


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
  2023-12-05  8:35   ` Jason Wang
@ 2023-12-05 11:05     ` Heng Qi
  2023-12-06  9:11       ` Jason Wang
  2023-12-06 12:27       ` Paolo Abeni
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Wang
  Cc: netdev, virtualization, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet,
	davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo



在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
>> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
>> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
> Can you explain why?

For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack 
occurs:
virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close -> 
cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).

>> Therefore, treating
>> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
>> the basis for the next patch.
> Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
>
> 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time

Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an 
atomic
environment rules out the mutex lock.

> 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq

Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing 
the lock.
Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?

Thanks!

>
> Thanks


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
  2023-12-05 11:05     ` Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-06  9:11       ` Jason Wang
  2023-12-06 12:27       ` Paolo Abeni
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2023-12-06  9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Heng Qi
  Cc: netdev, virtualization, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet,
	davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:06 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
> >> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
> >> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
> > Can you explain why?
>
> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
> occurs:
> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).

Can we use rtnl_trylock() and reschedule the work?

>
> >> Therefore, treating
> >> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
> >> the basis for the next patch.
> > Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
> >
> > 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
>
> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
> atomic
> environment rules out the mutex lock.

It is a "bug" that we need to fix.

>
> > 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
>
> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
> the lock.
> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?

So far no, you can refer to the past discussions, it might require the
collaboration from the uAPI and stack.

Thanks

>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > Thanks
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
  2023-12-05 11:05     ` Heng Qi
  2023-12-06  9:11       ` Jason Wang
@ 2023-12-06 12:27       ` Paolo Abeni
  2023-12-06 13:03         ` Heng Qi
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2023-12-06 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Heng Qi, Jason Wang
  Cc: netdev, virtualization, mst, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem,
	hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo

On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 19:05 +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> 
> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > > Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
> > > fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
> > > may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
> > Can you explain why?
> 
> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack 
> occurs:
> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close -> 
> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
> 
> > > Therefore, treating
> > > ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
> > > the basis for the next patch.
> > Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
> > 
> > 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
> 
> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an 
> atomic
> environment rules out the mutex lock.
> 
> > 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
> 
> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing 
> the lock.
> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?

What about:

- using the rtnl lock only
- virtionet_close() invokes cancel_work(), without flushing the work
- virtnet_remove() calls flush_work() after unregister_netdev(),
outside the rtnl lock

Should prevent both the deadlock and the UaF.

Side note: for this specific case any functional test with a
CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled build should suffice to catch the deadlock
scenario above.

Cheers,

Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
  2023-12-06 12:27       ` Paolo Abeni
@ 2023-12-06 13:03         ` Heng Qi
  2023-12-07  4:19           ` Jason Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-06 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Abeni, Jason Wang
  Cc: netdev, virtualization, mst, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem,
	hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo



在 2023/12/6 下午8:27, Paolo Abeni 写道:
> On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 19:05 +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
>> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>>> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
>>>> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
>>>> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
>>> Can you explain why?
>> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
>> occurs:
>> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
>> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
>>
>>>> Therefore, treating
>>>> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
>>>> the basis for the next patch.
>>> Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
>>>
>>> 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
>> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
>> atomic
>> environment rules out the mutex lock.
>>
>>> 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
>> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
>> the lock.
>> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?
> What about:
>
> - using the rtnl lock only
> - virtionet_close() invokes cancel_work(), without flushing the work
> - virtnet_remove() calls flush_work() after unregister_netdev(),
> outside the rtnl lock
>
> Should prevent both the deadlock and the UaF.


Hi, Paolo and Jason!

Thank you very much for your effective suggestions, but I found another 
solution[1],
based on the ideas of rtnl_trylock and refill_work, which works very well:

[1]
+static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+    struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
+    struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
+            struct receive_queue, dim);
+    struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
+    struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
+    struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
+    int i, qnum, err;
+
+    if (!rtnl_trylock())
+        return;
+
+    for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
+        rq = &vi->rq[i];
+        dim = &rq->dim;
+        qnum = rq - vi->rq;
+
+        if (!rq->dim_enabled)
+            continue;
+
+        update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode, 
dim->profile_ix);
+        if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
+            update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
+            err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
+                                   update_moder.usec,
+                                   update_moder.pkts);
+            if (err)
+                pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
+                     dev->name, qnum);
+            dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
+        }
+    }
+
+    rtnl_unlock();
+}


In addition, other optimizations[2] have been tried, but it may be due 
to the sparsely
scheduled work that the retry condition is always satisfied, affecting 
performance,
so [1] is the final solution:

[2]

+static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+    struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
+    struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
+            struct receive_queue, dim);
+    struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
+    struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
+    struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
+    int i, qnum, err, count;
+
+    if (!rtnl_trylock())
+        return;
+retry:
+    count = vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+    for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
+        rq = &vi->rq[i];
+        dim = &rq->dim;
+        qnum = rq - vi->rq;
+        update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode, 
dim->profile_ix);
+        if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
+            update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
+            --count;
+            err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
+                                   update_moder.usec,
+                                   update_moder.pkts);
+            if (err)
+                pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
+                     dev->name, qnum);
+            dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
+        }
+    }
+
+    if (need_resched()) {
+        rtnl_unlock();
+        schedule();
+    }
+
+    if (count)
+        goto retry;
+
+    rtnl_unlock();
+}

Thanks a lot!

>
> Side note: for this specific case any functional test with a
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled build should suffice to catch the deadlock
> scenario above.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
  2023-12-06 13:03         ` Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-07  4:19           ` Jason Wang
  2023-12-07  4:47             ` Heng Qi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2023-12-07  4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Heng Qi
  Cc: Paolo Abeni, netdev, virtualization, mst, kuba, yinjun.zhang,
	edumazet, davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:03 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 在 2023/12/6 下午8:27, Paolo Abeni 写道:
> > On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 19:05 +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> >> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >>>> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
> >>>> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
> >>>> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
> >>> Can you explain why?
> >> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
> >> occurs:
> >> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
> >> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
> >>
> >>>> Therefore, treating
> >>>> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
> >>>> the basis for the next patch.
> >>> Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
> >>>
> >>> 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
> >> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
> >> atomic
> >> environment rules out the mutex lock.
> >>
> >>> 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
> >> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
> >> the lock.
> >> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?
> > What about:
> >
> > - using the rtnl lock only
> > - virtionet_close() invokes cancel_work(), without flushing the work
> > - virtnet_remove() calls flush_work() after unregister_netdev(),
> > outside the rtnl lock
> >
> > Should prevent both the deadlock and the UaF.
>
>
> Hi, Paolo and Jason!
>
> Thank you very much for your effective suggestions, but I found another
> solution[1],
> based on the ideas of rtnl_trylock and refill_work, which works very well:
>
> [1]
> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +    struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
> +    struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
> +            struct receive_queue, dim);
> +    struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> +    struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> +    struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
> +    int i, qnum, err;
> +
> +    if (!rtnl_trylock())
> +        return;

Don't we need to reschedule here?

like

if (rq->dim_enabled)
       sechedule_work()

?

Thanks

> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
> +        rq = &vi->rq[i];
> +        dim = &rq->dim;
> +        qnum = rq - vi->rq;
> +
> +        if (!rq->dim_enabled)
> +            continue;
> +
> +        update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
> dim->profile_ix);
> +        if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
> +            update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
> +            err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
> +                                   update_moder.usec,
> +                                   update_moder.pkts);
> +            if (err)
> +                pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
> +                     dev->name, qnum);
> +            dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    rtnl_unlock();
> +}
>
>
> In addition, other optimizations[2] have been tried, but it may be due
> to the sparsely
> scheduled work that the retry condition is always satisfied, affecting
> performance,
> so [1] is the final solution:
>
> [2]
>
> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +    struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
> +    struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
> +            struct receive_queue, dim);
> +    struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> +    struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> +    struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
> +    int i, qnum, err, count;
> +
> +    if (!rtnl_trylock())
> +        return;
> +retry:
> +    count = vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> +    for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
> +        rq = &vi->rq[i];
> +        dim = &rq->dim;
> +        qnum = rq - vi->rq;
> +        update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
> dim->profile_ix);
> +        if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
> +            update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
> +            --count;
> +            err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
> +                                   update_moder.usec,
> +                                   update_moder.pkts);
> +            if (err)
> +                pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
> +                     dev->name, qnum);
> +            dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    if (need_resched()) {
> +        rtnl_unlock();
> +        schedule();
> +    }
> +
> +    if (count)
> +        goto retry;
> +
> +    rtnl_unlock();
> +}
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> >
> > Side note: for this specific case any functional test with a
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled build should suffice to catch the deadlock
> > scenario above.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Paolo
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
  2023-12-07  4:19           ` Jason Wang
@ 2023-12-07  4:47             ` Heng Qi
  2023-12-07  5:31               ` Jason Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-07  4:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Wang
  Cc: Paolo Abeni, netdev, virtualization, mst, kuba, yinjun.zhang,
	edumazet, davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo



在 2023/12/7 下午12:19, Jason Wang 写道:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:03 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2023/12/6 下午8:27, Paolo Abeni 写道:
>>> On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 19:05 +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
>>>> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
>>>>>> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
>>>>>> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
>>>>> Can you explain why?
>>>> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
>>>> occurs:
>>>> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
>>>> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
>>>>
>>>>>> Therefore, treating
>>>>>> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
>>>>>> the basis for the next patch.
>>>>> Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
>>>> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
>>>> atomic
>>>> environment rules out the mutex lock.
>>>>
>>>>> 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
>>>> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
>>>> the lock.
>>>> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?
>>> What about:
>>>
>>> - using the rtnl lock only
>>> - virtionet_close() invokes cancel_work(), without flushing the work
>>> - virtnet_remove() calls flush_work() after unregister_netdev(),
>>> outside the rtnl lock
>>>
>>> Should prevent both the deadlock and the UaF.
>>
>> Hi, Paolo and Jason!
>>
>> Thank you very much for your effective suggestions, but I found another
>> solution[1],
>> based on the ideas of rtnl_trylock and refill_work, which works very well:
>>
>> [1]
>> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +    struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
>> +    struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
>> +            struct receive_queue, dim);
>> +    struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>> +    struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
>> +    struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
>> +    int i, qnum, err;
>> +
>> +    if (!rtnl_trylock())
>> +        return;
> Don't we need to reschedule here?
>
> like
>
> if (rq->dim_enabled)
>         sechedule_work()
>
> ?

I think no, we don't need this.

The work of each queue will be called by "net_dim()->schedule_work()"
when napi traffic changes (before schedule_work(), the dim->profile_ix
of the corresponding rxq has been updated).
So we only need to traverse and update the profiles of all rxqs in the
work which is obtaining the rtnl_lock.

Thanks!

>
> Thanks
>
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> +        rq = &vi->rq[i];
>> +        dim = &rq->dim;
>> +        qnum = rq - vi->rq;
>> +
>> +        if (!rq->dim_enabled)
>> +            continue;
>> +
>> +        update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
>> dim->profile_ix);
>> +        if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
>> +            update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
>> +            err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
>> +                                   update_moder.usec,
>> +                                   update_moder.pkts);
>> +            if (err)
>> +                pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
>> +                     dev->name, qnum);
>> +            dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    rtnl_unlock();
>> +}
>>
>>
>> In addition, other optimizations[2] have been tried, but it may be due
>> to the sparsely
>> scheduled work that the retry condition is always satisfied, affecting
>> performance,
>> so [1] is the final solution:
>>
>> [2]
>>
>> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +    struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
>> +    struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
>> +            struct receive_queue, dim);
>> +    struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>> +    struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
>> +    struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
>> +    int i, qnum, err, count;
>> +
>> +    if (!rtnl_trylock())
>> +        return;
>> +retry:
>> +    count = vi->curr_queue_pairs;
>> +    for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> +        rq = &vi->rq[i];
>> +        dim = &rq->dim;
>> +        qnum = rq - vi->rq;
>> +        update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
>> dim->profile_ix);
>> +        if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
>> +            update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
>> +            --count;
>> +            err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
>> +                                   update_moder.usec,
>> +                                   update_moder.pkts);
>> +            if (err)
>> +                pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
>> +                     dev->name, qnum);
>> +            dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (need_resched()) {
>> +        rtnl_unlock();
>> +        schedule();
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (count)
>> +        goto retry;
>> +
>> +    rtnl_unlock();
>> +}
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>>> Side note: for this specific case any functional test with a
>>> CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled build should suffice to catch the deadlock
>>> scenario above.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
  2023-12-07  4:47             ` Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-07  5:31               ` Jason Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2023-12-07  5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Heng Qi
  Cc: Paolo Abeni, netdev, virtualization, mst, kuba, yinjun.zhang,
	edumazet, davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 12:47 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 在 2023/12/7 下午12:19, Jason Wang 写道:
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:03 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> 在 2023/12/6 下午8:27, Paolo Abeni 写道:
> >>> On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 19:05 +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> >>>> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
> >>>>>> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
> >>>>>> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
> >>>>> Can you explain why?
> >>>> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
> >>>> occurs:
> >>>> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
> >>>> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Therefore, treating
> >>>>>> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
> >>>>>> the basis for the next patch.
> >>>>> Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
> >>>> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
> >>>> atomic
> >>>> environment rules out the mutex lock.
> >>>>
> >>>>> 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
> >>>> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
> >>>> the lock.
> >>>> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?
> >>> What about:
> >>>
> >>> - using the rtnl lock only
> >>> - virtionet_close() invokes cancel_work(), without flushing the work
> >>> - virtnet_remove() calls flush_work() after unregister_netdev(),
> >>> outside the rtnl lock
> >>>
> >>> Should prevent both the deadlock and the UaF.
> >>
> >> Hi, Paolo and Jason!
> >>
> >> Thank you very much for your effective suggestions, but I found another
> >> solution[1],
> >> based on the ideas of rtnl_trylock and refill_work, which works very well:
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >> +{
> >> +    struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
> >> +    struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
> >> +            struct receive_queue, dim);
> >> +    struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> >> +    struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> >> +    struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
> >> +    int i, qnum, err;
> >> +
> >> +    if (!rtnl_trylock())
> >> +        return;
> > Don't we need to reschedule here?
> >
> > like
> >
> > if (rq->dim_enabled)
> >         sechedule_work()
> >
> > ?
>
> I think no, we don't need this.
>
> The work of each queue will be called by "net_dim()->schedule_work()"
> when napi traffic changes (before schedule_work(), the dim->profile_ix
> of the corresponding rxq has been updated).
> So we only need to traverse and update the profiles of all rxqs in the
> work which is obtaining the rtnl_lock.

Ok, let's have a comment here then.

Thanks

>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >> +
> >> +    for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
> >> +        rq = &vi->rq[i];
> >> +        dim = &rq->dim;
> >> +        qnum = rq - vi->rq;
> >> +
> >> +        if (!rq->dim_enabled)
> >> +            continue;
> >> +
> >> +        update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
> >> dim->profile_ix);
> >> +        if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
> >> +            update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
> >> +            err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
> >> +                                   update_moder.usec,
> >> +                                   update_moder.pkts);
> >> +            if (err)
> >> +                pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
> >> +                     dev->name, qnum);
> >> +            dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> >> +        }
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    rtnl_unlock();
> >> +}
> >>
> >>
> >> In addition, other optimizations[2] have been tried, but it may be due
> >> to the sparsely
> >> scheduled work that the retry condition is always satisfied, affecting
> >> performance,
> >> so [1] is the final solution:
> >>
> >> [2]
> >>
> >> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >> +{
> >> +    struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
> >> +    struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
> >> +            struct receive_queue, dim);
> >> +    struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> >> +    struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> >> +    struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
> >> +    int i, qnum, err, count;
> >> +
> >> +    if (!rtnl_trylock())
> >> +        return;
> >> +retry:
> >> +    count = vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> >> +    for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
> >> +        rq = &vi->rq[i];
> >> +        dim = &rq->dim;
> >> +        qnum = rq - vi->rq;
> >> +        update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
> >> dim->profile_ix);
> >> +        if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
> >> +            update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
> >> +            --count;
> >> +            err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
> >> +                                   update_moder.usec,
> >> +                                   update_moder.pkts);
> >> +            if (err)
> >> +                pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
> >> +                     dev->name, qnum);
> >> +            dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> >> +        }
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    if (need_resched()) {
> >> +        rtnl_unlock();
> >> +        schedule();
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    if (count)
> >> +        goto retry;
> >> +
> >> +    rtnl_unlock();
> >> +}
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot!
> >>
> >>> Side note: for this specific case any functional test with a
> >>> CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled build should suffice to catch the deadlock
> >>> scenario above.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Paolo
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-07  5:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-05  8:02 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation Heng Qi
2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/5] virtio-net: returns whether napi is complete Heng Qi
2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/5] virtio-net: separate rx/tx coalescing moderation cmds Heng Qi
2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/5] virtio-net: extract virtqueue coalescig cmd for reuse Heng Qi
2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access Heng Qi
2023-12-05  8:35   ` Jason Wang
2023-12-05 11:05     ` Heng Qi
2023-12-06  9:11       ` Jason Wang
2023-12-06 12:27       ` Paolo Abeni
2023-12-06 13:03         ` Heng Qi
2023-12-07  4:19           ` Jason Wang
2023-12-07  4:47             ` Heng Qi
2023-12-07  5:31               ` Jason Wang
2023-12-05  8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 5/5] virtio-net: support rx netdim Heng Qi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).