* [PATCH net-next v6 1/5] virtio-net: returns whether napi is complete
2023-12-05 8:02 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05 8:02 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-05 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/5] virtio-net: separate rx/tx coalescing moderation cmds Heng Qi
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, virtualization
Cc: jasowang, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem, hawk,
john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
rx netdim needs to count the traffic during a complete napi process,
and start updating and comparing samples to make decisions after
the napi ends. Let virtqueue_napi_complete() return true if napi is done,
otherwise vice versa.
Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index d16f592c2061..0ad2894e6a5e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void virtqueue_napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *napi,
}
}
-static void virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
+static bool virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
struct virtqueue *vq, int processed)
{
int opaque;
@@ -440,9 +440,13 @@ static void virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
if (napi_complete_done(napi, processed)) {
if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(vq, opaque)))
virtqueue_napi_schedule(napi, vq);
+ else
+ return true;
} else {
virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
}
+
+ return false;
}
static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH net-next v6 2/5] virtio-net: separate rx/tx coalescing moderation cmds
2023-12-05 8:02 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation Heng Qi
2023-12-05 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/5] virtio-net: returns whether napi is complete Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05 8:02 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-05 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/5] virtio-net: extract virtqueue coalescig cmd for reuse Heng Qi
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, virtualization
Cc: jasowang, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem, hawk,
john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
This patch separates the rx and tx global coalescing moderation
commands to support netdim switches in subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 0ad2894e6a5e..0285301caf78 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -3266,10 +3266,10 @@ static int virtnet_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *dev,
return 0;
}
-static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
- struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
+static int virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+ struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
{
- struct scatterlist sgs_tx, sgs_rx;
+ struct scatterlist sgs_tx;
int i;
vi->ctrl->coal_tx.tx_usecs = cpu_to_le32(ec->tx_coalesce_usecs);
@@ -3289,6 +3289,15 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
vi->sq[i].intr_coal.max_packets = ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames;
}
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+ struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
+{
+ struct scatterlist sgs_rx;
+ int i;
+
vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_usecs = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_coalesce_usecs);
vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_max_packets = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
sg_init_one(&sgs_rx, &vi->ctrl->coal_rx, sizeof(vi->ctrl->coal_rx));
@@ -3309,6 +3318,22 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
return 0;
}
+static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+ struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_cmds(vi, ec);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ err = virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(vi, ec);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
u16 vqn, u32 max_usecs, u32 max_packets)
{
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH net-next v6 3/5] virtio-net: extract virtqueue coalescig cmd for reuse
2023-12-05 8:02 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation Heng Qi
2023-12-05 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/5] virtio-net: returns whether napi is complete Heng Qi
2023-12-05 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/5] virtio-net: separate rx/tx coalescing moderation cmds Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05 8:02 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-05 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access Heng Qi
2023-12-05 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 5/5] virtio-net: support rx netdim Heng Qi
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, virtualization
Cc: jasowang, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem, hawk,
john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
Extract commands to set virtqueue coalescing parameters for reuse
by ethtool -Q, vq resize and netdim.
Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 0285301caf78..69fe09e99b3c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -2849,6 +2849,58 @@ static void virtnet_cpu_notif_remove(struct virtnet_info *vi)
&vi->node_dead);
}
+static int virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+ u16 vqn, u32 max_usecs, u32 max_packets)
+{
+ struct scatterlist sgs;
+
+ vi->ctrl->coal_vq.vqn = cpu_to_le16(vqn);
+ vi->ctrl->coal_vq.coal.max_usecs = cpu_to_le32(max_usecs);
+ vi->ctrl->coal_vq.coal.max_packets = cpu_to_le32(max_packets);
+ sg_init_one(&sgs, &vi->ctrl->coal_vq, sizeof(vi->ctrl->coal_vq));
+
+ if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL,
+ VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET,
+ &sgs))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+ u16 queue, u32 max_usecs,
+ u32 max_packets)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, rxq2vq(queue),
+ max_usecs, max_packets);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs = max_usecs;
+ vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets = max_packets;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+ u16 queue, u32 max_usecs,
+ u32 max_packets)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, txq2vq(queue),
+ max_usecs, max_packets);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs = max_usecs;
+ vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets = max_packets;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void virtnet_get_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
struct ethtool_ringparam *ring,
struct kernel_ethtool_ringparam *kernel_ring,
@@ -2906,14 +2958,11 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
* through the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET command, or, if the driver
* did not set any TX coalescing parameters, to 0.
*/
- err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, txq2vq(i),
- vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
- vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
+ err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
+ vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
+ vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
if (err)
return err;
-
- vi->sq[i].intr_coal.max_usecs = vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs;
- vi->sq[i].intr_coal.max_packets = vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets;
}
if (ring->rx_pending != rx_pending) {
@@ -2922,14 +2971,11 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
return err;
/* The reason is same as the transmit virtqueue reset */
- err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, rxq2vq(i),
- vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs,
- vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets);
+ err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
+ vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs,
+ vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets);
if (err)
return err;
-
- vi->rq[i].intr_coal.max_usecs = vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs;
- vi->rq[i].intr_coal.max_packets = vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets;
}
}
@@ -3334,48 +3380,24 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
return 0;
}
-static int virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
- u16 vqn, u32 max_usecs, u32 max_packets)
-{
- struct scatterlist sgs;
-
- vi->ctrl->coal_vq.vqn = cpu_to_le16(vqn);
- vi->ctrl->coal_vq.coal.max_usecs = cpu_to_le32(max_usecs);
- vi->ctrl->coal_vq.coal.max_packets = cpu_to_le32(max_packets);
- sg_init_one(&sgs, &vi->ctrl->coal_vq, sizeof(vi->ctrl->coal_vq));
-
- if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL,
- VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET,
- &sgs))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
struct ethtool_coalesce *ec,
u16 queue)
{
int err;
- err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, rxq2vq(queue),
- ec->rx_coalesce_usecs,
- ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
+ err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
+ ec->rx_coalesce_usecs,
+ ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
if (err)
return err;
- vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs = ec->rx_coalesce_usecs;
- vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets = ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames;
-
- err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, txq2vq(queue),
- ec->tx_coalesce_usecs,
- ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
+ err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
+ ec->tx_coalesce_usecs,
+ ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
if (err)
return err;
- vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs = ec->tx_coalesce_usecs;
- vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets = ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames;
-
return 0;
}
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
2023-12-05 8:02 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation Heng Qi
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-05 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/5] virtio-net: extract virtqueue coalescig cmd for reuse Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05 8:02 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-05 8:35 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-05 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 5/5] virtio-net: support rx netdim Heng Qi
4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, virtualization
Cc: jasowang, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem, hawk,
john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work. Therefore, treating
ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
the basis for the next patch.
Since ndo_set_rx_mode is in an atomic environment(netif_addr_lock_bh),
the mutex lock is excluded.
And I tried putting the spin lock in virtnet_send_command, but
virtnet_rx_dim_work and virtnet_set_per_queue_coalesce access to
shared variables prevent this.
cancel_work_sync and virtnet_rx_dim_work are from the next patch.
Please review. Thanks a lot!
Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 69fe09e99b3c..0dd09c4f8d89 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
struct control_buf *ctrl;
+ /* The lock to synchronize the access to contrl cmd */
+ spinlock_t ctrl_lock;
+
/* Ethtool settings */
u8 duplex;
u32 speed;
@@ -2520,13 +2523,16 @@ static int virtnet_set_mac_address(struct net_device *dev, void *p)
if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR)) {
sg_init_one(&sg, addr->sa_data, dev->addr_len);
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET, &sg)) {
dev_warn(&vdev->dev,
"Failed to set mac address by vq command.\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
goto out;
}
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
} else if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) &&
!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
unsigned int i;
@@ -2589,9 +2595,11 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev,
static void virtnet_ack_link_announce(struct virtnet_info *vi)
{
rtnl_lock();
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ANNOUNCE,
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ANNOUNCE_ACK, NULL))
dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev, "Failed to ack link announce.\n");
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
rtnl_unlock();
}
@@ -2603,6 +2611,7 @@ static int _virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
if (!vi->has_cvq || !virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ))
return 0;
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
vi->ctrl->mq.virtqueue_pairs = cpu_to_virtio16(vi->vdev, queue_pairs);
sg_init_one(&sg, &vi->ctrl->mq, sizeof(vi->ctrl->mq));
@@ -2610,6 +2619,7 @@ static int _virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET, &sg)) {
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Fail to set num of queue pairs to %d\n",
queue_pairs);
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return -EINVAL;
} else {
vi->curr_queue_pairs = queue_pairs;
@@ -2618,6 +2628,7 @@ static int _virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
}
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -2662,6 +2673,7 @@ static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
if (!virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX))
return;
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
vi->ctrl->promisc = ((dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC) != 0);
vi->ctrl->allmulti = ((dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI) != 0);
@@ -2679,6 +2691,7 @@ static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Failed to %sable allmulti mode.\n",
vi->ctrl->allmulti ? "en" : "dis");
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
uc_count = netdev_uc_count(dev);
mc_count = netdev_mc_count(dev);
/* MAC filter - use one buffer for both lists */
@@ -2710,10 +2723,12 @@ static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
sg_set_buf(&sg[1], mac_data,
sizeof(mac_data->entries) + (mc_count * ETH_ALEN));
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_TABLE_SET, sg))
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Failed to set MAC filter table.\n");
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
kfree(buf);
}
@@ -2723,12 +2738,15 @@ static int virtnet_vlan_rx_add_vid(struct net_device *dev,
struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
struct scatterlist sg;
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
vi->ctrl->vid = cpu_to_virtio16(vi->vdev, vid);
sg_init_one(&sg, &vi->ctrl->vid, sizeof(vi->ctrl->vid));
if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_VLAN,
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_VLAN_ADD, &sg))
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Failed to add VLAN ID %d.\n", vid);
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -2738,12 +2756,15 @@ static int virtnet_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev,
struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
struct scatterlist sg;
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
vi->ctrl->vid = cpu_to_virtio16(vi->vdev, vid);
sg_init_one(&sg, &vi->ctrl->vid, sizeof(vi->ctrl->vid));
if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_VLAN,
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_VLAN_DEL, &sg))
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Failed to kill VLAN ID %d.\n", vid);
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -2958,11 +2979,15 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
* through the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET command, or, if the driver
* did not set any TX coalescing parameters, to 0.
*/
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return err;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
}
if (ring->rx_pending != rx_pending) {
@@ -2971,11 +2996,15 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
return err;
/* The reason is same as the transmit virtqueue reset */
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs,
vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return err;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
}
}
@@ -2991,6 +3020,7 @@ static bool virtnet_commit_rss_command(struct virtnet_info *vi)
/* prepare sgs */
sg_init_table(sgs, 4);
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
sg_buf_size = offsetof(struct virtio_net_ctrl_rss, indirection_table);
sg_set_buf(&sgs[0], &vi->ctrl->rss, sg_buf_size);
@@ -3008,8 +3038,12 @@ static bool virtnet_commit_rss_command(struct virtnet_info *vi)
vi->has_rss ? VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_RSS_CONFIG
: VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_HASH_CONFIG, sgs)) {
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "VIRTIONET issue with committing RSS sgs\n");
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return false;
}
+
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
return true;
}
@@ -3318,14 +3352,17 @@ static int virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
struct scatterlist sgs_tx;
int i;
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
vi->ctrl->coal_tx.tx_usecs = cpu_to_le32(ec->tx_coalesce_usecs);
vi->ctrl->coal_tx.tx_max_packets = cpu_to_le32(ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
sg_init_one(&sgs_tx, &vi->ctrl->coal_tx, sizeof(vi->ctrl->coal_tx));
if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL,
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET,
- &sgs_tx))
+ &sgs_tx)) {
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return -EINVAL;
+ }
/* Save parameters */
vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs = ec->tx_coalesce_usecs;
@@ -3334,6 +3371,7 @@ static int virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
vi->sq[i].intr_coal.max_usecs = ec->tx_coalesce_usecs;
vi->sq[i].intr_coal.max_packets = ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames;
}
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -3344,14 +3382,17 @@ static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
struct scatterlist sgs_rx;
int i;
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_usecs = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_coalesce_usecs);
vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_max_packets = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
sg_init_one(&sgs_rx, &vi->ctrl->coal_rx, sizeof(vi->ctrl->coal_rx));
if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL,
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET,
- &sgs_rx))
+ &sgs_rx)) {
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return -EINVAL;
+ }
/* Save parameters */
vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs = ec->rx_coalesce_usecs;
@@ -3361,6 +3402,8 @@ static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
vi->rq[i].intr_coal.max_packets = ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames;
}
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -3386,17 +3429,24 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
{
int err;
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
ec->rx_coalesce_usecs,
ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return err;
+ }
err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
ec->tx_coalesce_usecs,
ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return err;
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -3733,6 +3783,8 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)
static int virtnet_set_guest_offloads(struct virtnet_info *vi, u64 offloads)
{
struct scatterlist sg;
+
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
vi->ctrl->offloads = cpu_to_virtio64(vi->vdev, offloads);
sg_init_one(&sg, &vi->ctrl->offloads, sizeof(vi->ctrl->offloads));
@@ -3740,9 +3792,11 @@ static int virtnet_set_guest_offloads(struct virtnet_info *vi, u64 offloads)
if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS,
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS_SET, &sg)) {
dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev, "Fail to set guest offload.\n");
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -4525,6 +4579,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
INIT_WORK(&vi->config_work, virtnet_config_changed_work);
spin_lock_init(&vi->refill_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&vi->ctrl_lock);
if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
vi->mergeable_rx_bufs = true;
@@ -4669,13 +4724,16 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
struct scatterlist sg;
sg_init_one(&sg, dev->dev_addr, dev->addr_len);
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET, &sg)) {
pr_debug("virtio_net: setting MAC address failed\n");
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
rtnl_unlock();
err = -EINVAL;
goto free_unregister_netdev;
}
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
}
rtnl_unlock();
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
2023-12-05 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05 8:35 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-05 11:05 ` Heng Qi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2023-12-05 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heng Qi
Cc: netdev, virtualization, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet,
davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
Can you explain why?
> Therefore, treating
> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
> the basis for the next patch.
Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
2023-12-05 8:35 ` Jason Wang
@ 2023-12-05 11:05 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-06 9:11 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-06 12:27 ` Paolo Abeni
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang
Cc: netdev, virtualization, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet,
davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
>> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
>> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
> Can you explain why?
For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
occurs:
virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
>> Therefore, treating
>> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
>> the basis for the next patch.
> Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
>
> 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
atomic
environment rules out the mutex lock.
> 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
the lock.
Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?
Thanks!
>
> Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
2023-12-05 11:05 ` Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-06 9:11 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-06 12:27 ` Paolo Abeni
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2023-12-06 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heng Qi
Cc: netdev, virtualization, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet,
davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:06 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
> >> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
> >> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
> > Can you explain why?
>
> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
> occurs:
> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
Can we use rtnl_trylock() and reschedule the work?
>
> >> Therefore, treating
> >> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
> >> the basis for the next patch.
> > Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
> >
> > 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
>
> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
> atomic
> environment rules out the mutex lock.
It is a "bug" that we need to fix.
>
> > 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
>
> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
> the lock.
> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?
So far no, you can refer to the past discussions, it might require the
collaboration from the uAPI and stack.
Thanks
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > Thanks
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
2023-12-05 11:05 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-06 9:11 ` Jason Wang
@ 2023-12-06 12:27 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-12-06 13:03 ` Heng Qi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2023-12-06 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heng Qi, Jason Wang
Cc: netdev, virtualization, mst, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem,
hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 19:05 +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
>
> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > > Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
> > > fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
> > > may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
> > Can you explain why?
>
> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
> occurs:
> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
>
> > > Therefore, treating
> > > ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
> > > the basis for the next patch.
> > Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
> >
> > 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
>
> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
> atomic
> environment rules out the mutex lock.
>
> > 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
>
> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
> the lock.
> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?
What about:
- using the rtnl lock only
- virtionet_close() invokes cancel_work(), without flushing the work
- virtnet_remove() calls flush_work() after unregister_netdev(),
outside the rtnl lock
Should prevent both the deadlock and the UaF.
Side note: for this specific case any functional test with a
CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled build should suffice to catch the deadlock
scenario above.
Cheers,
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
2023-12-06 12:27 ` Paolo Abeni
@ 2023-12-06 13:03 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-07 4:19 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-06 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, Jason Wang
Cc: netdev, virtualization, mst, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem,
hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
在 2023/12/6 下午8:27, Paolo Abeni 写道:
> On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 19:05 +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
>> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>>> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
>>>> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
>>>> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
>>> Can you explain why?
>> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
>> occurs:
>> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
>> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
>>
>>>> Therefore, treating
>>>> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
>>>> the basis for the next patch.
>>> Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
>>>
>>> 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
>> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
>> atomic
>> environment rules out the mutex lock.
>>
>>> 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
>> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
>> the lock.
>> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?
> What about:
>
> - using the rtnl lock only
> - virtionet_close() invokes cancel_work(), without flushing the work
> - virtnet_remove() calls flush_work() after unregister_netdev(),
> outside the rtnl lock
>
> Should prevent both the deadlock and the UaF.
Hi, Paolo and Jason!
Thank you very much for your effective suggestions, but I found another
solution[1],
based on the ideas of rtnl_trylock and refill_work, which works very well:
[1]
+static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
+ struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
+ struct receive_queue, dim);
+ struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
+ struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
+ struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
+ int i, qnum, err;
+
+ if (!rtnl_trylock())
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
+ rq = &vi->rq[i];
+ dim = &rq->dim;
+ qnum = rq - vi->rq;
+
+ if (!rq->dim_enabled)
+ continue;
+
+ update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
dim->profile_ix);
+ if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
+ update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
+ err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
+ update_moder.usec,
+ update_moder.pkts);
+ if (err)
+ pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
+ dev->name, qnum);
+ dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
+ }
+ }
+
+ rtnl_unlock();
+}
In addition, other optimizations[2] have been tried, but it may be due
to the sparsely
scheduled work that the retry condition is always satisfied, affecting
performance,
so [1] is the final solution:
[2]
+static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
+ struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
+ struct receive_queue, dim);
+ struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
+ struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
+ struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
+ int i, qnum, err, count;
+
+ if (!rtnl_trylock())
+ return;
+retry:
+ count = vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+ for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
+ rq = &vi->rq[i];
+ dim = &rq->dim;
+ qnum = rq - vi->rq;
+ update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
dim->profile_ix);
+ if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
+ update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
+ --count;
+ err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
+ update_moder.usec,
+ update_moder.pkts);
+ if (err)
+ pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
+ dev->name, qnum);
+ dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (need_resched()) {
+ rtnl_unlock();
+ schedule();
+ }
+
+ if (count)
+ goto retry;
+
+ rtnl_unlock();
+}
Thanks a lot!
>
> Side note: for this specific case any functional test with a
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled build should suffice to catch the deadlock
> scenario above.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
2023-12-06 13:03 ` Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-07 4:19 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-07 4:47 ` Heng Qi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2023-12-07 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heng Qi
Cc: Paolo Abeni, netdev, virtualization, mst, kuba, yinjun.zhang,
edumazet, davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:03 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 在 2023/12/6 下午8:27, Paolo Abeni 写道:
> > On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 19:05 +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> >> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >>>> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
> >>>> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
> >>>> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
> >>> Can you explain why?
> >> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
> >> occurs:
> >> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
> >> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
> >>
> >>>> Therefore, treating
> >>>> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
> >>>> the basis for the next patch.
> >>> Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
> >>>
> >>> 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
> >> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
> >> atomic
> >> environment rules out the mutex lock.
> >>
> >>> 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
> >> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
> >> the lock.
> >> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?
> > What about:
> >
> > - using the rtnl lock only
> > - virtionet_close() invokes cancel_work(), without flushing the work
> > - virtnet_remove() calls flush_work() after unregister_netdev(),
> > outside the rtnl lock
> >
> > Should prevent both the deadlock and the UaF.
>
>
> Hi, Paolo and Jason!
>
> Thank you very much for your effective suggestions, but I found another
> solution[1],
> based on the ideas of rtnl_trylock and refill_work, which works very well:
>
> [1]
> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
> + struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
> + struct receive_queue, dim);
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> + struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> + struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
> + int i, qnum, err;
> +
> + if (!rtnl_trylock())
> + return;
Don't we need to reschedule here?
like
if (rq->dim_enabled)
sechedule_work()
?
Thanks
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
> + rq = &vi->rq[i];
> + dim = &rq->dim;
> + qnum = rq - vi->rq;
> +
> + if (!rq->dim_enabled)
> + continue;
> +
> + update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
> dim->profile_ix);
> + if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
> + update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
> + err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
> + update_moder.usec,
> + update_moder.pkts);
> + if (err)
> + pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
> + dev->name, qnum);
> + dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + rtnl_unlock();
> +}
>
>
> In addition, other optimizations[2] have been tried, but it may be due
> to the sparsely
> scheduled work that the retry condition is always satisfied, affecting
> performance,
> so [1] is the final solution:
>
> [2]
>
> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
> + struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
> + struct receive_queue, dim);
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> + struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> + struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
> + int i, qnum, err, count;
> +
> + if (!rtnl_trylock())
> + return;
> +retry:
> + count = vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> + for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
> + rq = &vi->rq[i];
> + dim = &rq->dim;
> + qnum = rq - vi->rq;
> + update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
> dim->profile_ix);
> + if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
> + update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
> + --count;
> + err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
> + update_moder.usec,
> + update_moder.pkts);
> + if (err)
> + pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
> + dev->name, qnum);
> + dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (need_resched()) {
> + rtnl_unlock();
> + schedule();
> + }
> +
> + if (count)
> + goto retry;
> +
> + rtnl_unlock();
> +}
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> >
> > Side note: for this specific case any functional test with a
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled build should suffice to catch the deadlock
> > scenario above.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Paolo
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
2023-12-07 4:19 ` Jason Wang
@ 2023-12-07 4:47 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-07 5:31 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-07 4:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang
Cc: Paolo Abeni, netdev, virtualization, mst, kuba, yinjun.zhang,
edumazet, davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
在 2023/12/7 下午12:19, Jason Wang 写道:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:03 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2023/12/6 下午8:27, Paolo Abeni 写道:
>>> On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 19:05 +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
>>>> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
>>>>>> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
>>>>>> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
>>>>> Can you explain why?
>>>> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
>>>> occurs:
>>>> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
>>>> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
>>>>
>>>>>> Therefore, treating
>>>>>> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
>>>>>> the basis for the next patch.
>>>>> Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
>>>> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
>>>> atomic
>>>> environment rules out the mutex lock.
>>>>
>>>>> 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
>>>> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
>>>> the lock.
>>>> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?
>>> What about:
>>>
>>> - using the rtnl lock only
>>> - virtionet_close() invokes cancel_work(), without flushing the work
>>> - virtnet_remove() calls flush_work() after unregister_netdev(),
>>> outside the rtnl lock
>>>
>>> Should prevent both the deadlock and the UaF.
>>
>> Hi, Paolo and Jason!
>>
>> Thank you very much for your effective suggestions, but I found another
>> solution[1],
>> based on the ideas of rtnl_trylock and refill_work, which works very well:
>>
>> [1]
>> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> + struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
>> + struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
>> + struct receive_queue, dim);
>> + struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>> + struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
>> + struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
>> + int i, qnum, err;
>> +
>> + if (!rtnl_trylock())
>> + return;
> Don't we need to reschedule here?
>
> like
>
> if (rq->dim_enabled)
> sechedule_work()
>
> ?
I think no, we don't need this.
The work of each queue will be called by "net_dim()->schedule_work()"
when napi traffic changes (before schedule_work(), the dim->profile_ix
of the corresponding rxq has been updated).
So we only need to traverse and update the profiles of all rxqs in the
work which is obtaining the rtnl_lock.
Thanks!
>
> Thanks
>
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> + rq = &vi->rq[i];
>> + dim = &rq->dim;
>> + qnum = rq - vi->rq;
>> +
>> + if (!rq->dim_enabled)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
>> dim->profile_ix);
>> + if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
>> + update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
>> + err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
>> + update_moder.usec,
>> + update_moder.pkts);
>> + if (err)
>> + pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
>> + dev->name, qnum);
>> + dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + rtnl_unlock();
>> +}
>>
>>
>> In addition, other optimizations[2] have been tried, but it may be due
>> to the sparsely
>> scheduled work that the retry condition is always satisfied, affecting
>> performance,
>> so [1] is the final solution:
>>
>> [2]
>>
>> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> + struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
>> + struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
>> + struct receive_queue, dim);
>> + struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>> + struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
>> + struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
>> + int i, qnum, err, count;
>> +
>> + if (!rtnl_trylock())
>> + return;
>> +retry:
>> + count = vi->curr_queue_pairs;
>> + for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> + rq = &vi->rq[i];
>> + dim = &rq->dim;
>> + qnum = rq - vi->rq;
>> + update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
>> dim->profile_ix);
>> + if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
>> + update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
>> + --count;
>> + err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
>> + update_moder.usec,
>> + update_moder.pkts);
>> + if (err)
>> + pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
>> + dev->name, qnum);
>> + dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (need_resched()) {
>> + rtnl_unlock();
>> + schedule();
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (count)
>> + goto retry;
>> +
>> + rtnl_unlock();
>> +}
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>>> Side note: for this specific case any functional test with a
>>> CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled build should suffice to catch the deadlock
>>> scenario above.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access
2023-12-07 4:47 ` Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-07 5:31 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2023-12-07 5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heng Qi
Cc: Paolo Abeni, netdev, virtualization, mst, kuba, yinjun.zhang,
edumazet, davem, hawk, john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 12:47 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 在 2023/12/7 下午12:19, Jason Wang 写道:
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:03 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> 在 2023/12/6 下午8:27, Paolo Abeni 写道:
> >>> On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 19:05 +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> >>>> 在 2023/12/5 下午4:35, Jason Wang 写道:
> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:02 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Currently access to ctrl cmd is globally protected via rtnl_lock and works
> >>>>>> fine. But if dim work's access to ctrl cmd also holds rtnl_lock, deadlock
> >>>>>> may occur due to cancel_work_sync for dim work.
> >>>>> Can you explain why?
> >>>> For example, during the bus unbind operation, the following call stack
> >>>> occurs:
> >>>> virtnet_remove -> unregister_netdev -> rtnl_lock[1] -> virtnet_close ->
> >>>> cancel_work_sync -> virtnet_rx_dim_work -> rtnl_lock[2] (deadlock occurs).
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Therefore, treating
> >>>>>> ctrl cmd as a separate protection object of the lock is the solution and
> >>>>>> the basis for the next patch.
> >>>>> Let's don't do that. Reasons are:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1) virtnet_send_command() may wait for cvq commands for an indefinite time
> >>>> Yes, I took that into consideration. But ndo_set_rx_mode's need for an
> >>>> atomic
> >>>> environment rules out the mutex lock.
> >>>>
> >>>>> 2) hold locks may complicate the future hardening works around cvq
> >>>> Agree, but I don't seem to have thought of a better way besides passing
> >>>> the lock.
> >>>> Do you have any other better ideas or suggestions?
> >>> What about:
> >>>
> >>> - using the rtnl lock only
> >>> - virtionet_close() invokes cancel_work(), without flushing the work
> >>> - virtnet_remove() calls flush_work() after unregister_netdev(),
> >>> outside the rtnl lock
> >>>
> >>> Should prevent both the deadlock and the UaF.
> >>
> >> Hi, Paolo and Jason!
> >>
> >> Thank you very much for your effective suggestions, but I found another
> >> solution[1],
> >> based on the ideas of rtnl_trylock and refill_work, which works very well:
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >> +{
> >> + struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
> >> + struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
> >> + struct receive_queue, dim);
> >> + struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> >> + struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> >> + struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
> >> + int i, qnum, err;
> >> +
> >> + if (!rtnl_trylock())
> >> + return;
> > Don't we need to reschedule here?
> >
> > like
> >
> > if (rq->dim_enabled)
> > sechedule_work()
> >
> > ?
>
> I think no, we don't need this.
>
> The work of each queue will be called by "net_dim()->schedule_work()"
> when napi traffic changes (before schedule_work(), the dim->profile_ix
> of the corresponding rxq has been updated).
> So we only need to traverse and update the profiles of all rxqs in the
> work which is obtaining the rtnl_lock.
Ok, let's have a comment here then.
Thanks
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
> >> + rq = &vi->rq[i];
> >> + dim = &rq->dim;
> >> + qnum = rq - vi->rq;
> >> +
> >> + if (!rq->dim_enabled)
> >> + continue;
> >> +
> >> + update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
> >> dim->profile_ix);
> >> + if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
> >> + update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
> >> + err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
> >> + update_moder.usec,
> >> + update_moder.pkts);
> >> + if (err)
> >> + pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
> >> + dev->name, qnum);
> >> + dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + rtnl_unlock();
> >> +}
> >>
> >>
> >> In addition, other optimizations[2] have been tried, but it may be due
> >> to the sparsely
> >> scheduled work that the retry condition is always satisfied, affecting
> >> performance,
> >> so [1] is the final solution:
> >>
> >> [2]
> >>
> >> +static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >> +{
> >> + struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
> >> + struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
> >> + struct receive_queue, dim);
> >> + struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> >> + struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> >> + struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
> >> + int i, qnum, err, count;
> >> +
> >> + if (!rtnl_trylock())
> >> + return;
> >> +retry:
> >> + count = vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> >> + for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
> >> + rq = &vi->rq[i];
> >> + dim = &rq->dim;
> >> + qnum = rq - vi->rq;
> >> + update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
> >> dim->profile_ix);
> >> + if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
> >> + update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
> >> + --count;
> >> + err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
> >> + update_moder.usec,
> >> + update_moder.pkts);
> >> + if (err)
> >> + pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
> >> + dev->name, qnum);
> >> + dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (need_resched()) {
> >> + rtnl_unlock();
> >> + schedule();
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (count)
> >> + goto retry;
> >> +
> >> + rtnl_unlock();
> >> +}
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot!
> >>
> >>> Side note: for this specific case any functional test with a
> >>> CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled build should suffice to catch the deadlock
> >>> scenario above.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Paolo
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v6 5/5] virtio-net: support rx netdim
2023-12-05 8:02 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] virtio-net: support dynamic coalescing moderation Heng Qi
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-05 8:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] virtio-net: add spin lock for ctrl cmd access Heng Qi
@ 2023-12-05 8:02 ` Heng Qi
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heng Qi @ 2023-12-05 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, virtualization
Cc: jasowang, mst, pabeni, kuba, yinjun.zhang, edumazet, davem, hawk,
john.fastabend, ast, horms, xuanzhuo
By comparing the traffic information in the complete napi processes,
let the virtio-net driver automatically adjust the coalescing
moderation parameters of each receive queue.
Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
v5->v5:
- Use spin lock and cancel_work_sync to synchronize
v4->v5:
- Fix possible synchronization issues using cancel_work().
- Reduce if/else nesting levels
v2->v3:
- Some minor modifications.
v1->v2:
- Improved the judgment of dim switch conditions.
- Cancel the work when vq reset.
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 167 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 0dd09c4f8d89..882761c64db4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/average.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/dim.h>
#include <net/route.h>
#include <net/xdp.h>
#include <net/net_failover.h>
@@ -172,6 +173,17 @@ struct receive_queue {
struct virtnet_rq_stats stats;
+ /* The number of rx notifications */
+ u16 calls;
+
+ /* Is dynamic interrupt moderation enabled? */
+ bool dim_enabled;
+
+ /* Dynamic Interrupt Moderation */
+ struct dim dim;
+
+ u32 packets_in_napi;
+
struct virtnet_interrupt_coalesce intr_coal;
/* Chain pages by the private ptr. */
@@ -308,6 +320,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
u8 duplex;
u32 speed;
+ /* Is rx dynamic interrupt moderation enabled? */
+ bool rx_dim_enabled;
+
/* Interrupt coalescing settings */
struct virtnet_interrupt_coalesce intr_coal_tx;
struct virtnet_interrupt_coalesce intr_coal_rx;
@@ -2004,6 +2019,7 @@ static void skb_recv_done(struct virtqueue *rvq)
struct virtnet_info *vi = rvq->vdev->priv;
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[vq2rxq(rvq)];
+ rq->calls++;
virtqueue_napi_schedule(&rq->napi, rvq);
}
@@ -2144,6 +2160,26 @@ static void virtnet_poll_cleantx(struct receive_queue *rq)
}
}
+static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work);
+
+static void virtnet_rx_dim_update(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
+{
+ struct dim_sample cur_sample = {};
+
+ if (!rq->packets_in_napi)
+ return;
+
+ u64_stats_update_begin(&rq->stats.syncp);
+ dim_update_sample(rq->calls,
+ u64_stats_read(&rq->stats.packets),
+ u64_stats_read(&rq->stats.bytes),
+ &cur_sample);
+ u64_stats_update_end(&rq->stats.syncp);
+
+ net_dim(&rq->dim, cur_sample);
+ rq->packets_in_napi = 0;
+}
+
static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
{
struct receive_queue *rq =
@@ -2152,17 +2188,22 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
struct send_queue *sq;
unsigned int received;
unsigned int xdp_xmit = 0;
+ bool napi_complete;
virtnet_poll_cleantx(rq);
received = virtnet_receive(rq, budget, &xdp_xmit);
+ rq->packets_in_napi += received;
if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_REDIR)
xdp_do_flush();
/* Out of packets? */
- if (received < budget)
- virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, rq->vq, received);
+ if (received < budget) {
+ napi_complete = virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, rq->vq, received);
+ if (napi_complete && rq->dim_enabled)
+ virtnet_rx_dim_update(vi, rq);
+ }
if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_TX) {
sq = virtnet_xdp_get_sq(vi);
@@ -2233,8 +2274,11 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
disable_delayed_refill(vi);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
- for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i);
+ cancel_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].dim.work);
+ }
+
return err;
}
@@ -2396,8 +2440,10 @@ static int virtnet_rx_resize(struct virtnet_info *vi,
qindex = rq - vi->rq;
- if (running)
+ if (running) {
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
+ cancel_work_sync(&rq->dim.work);
+ }
err = virtqueue_resize(rq->vq, ring_num, virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf);
if (err)
@@ -2652,8 +2698,10 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
/* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
- for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i);
+ cancel_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].dim.work);
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -2905,20 +2953,25 @@ static int virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
return 0;
}
-static int virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
- u16 queue, u32 max_usecs,
- u32 max_packets)
+static int virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+ u16 queue, u32 max_usecs,
+ u32 max_packets)
{
int err;
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, txq2vq(queue),
max_usecs, max_packets);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
return err;
+ }
vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs = max_usecs;
vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets = max_packets;
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -2935,9 +2988,6 @@ static void virtnet_get_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
ring->tx_pending = virtqueue_get_vring_size(vi->sq[0].vq);
}
-static int virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
- u16 vqn, u32 max_usecs, u32 max_packets);
-
static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
struct ethtool_ringparam *ring,
struct kernel_ethtool_ringparam *kernel_ring,
@@ -2979,15 +3029,11 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
* through the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET command, or, if the driver
* did not set any TX coalescing parameters, to 0.
*/
- spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
- err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
- vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
- vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
- if (err) {
- spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+ err = virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_vq_cmds(vi, i,
+ vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
+ vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
+ if (err)
return err;
- }
- spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
}
if (ring->rx_pending != rx_pending) {
@@ -3379,9 +3425,34 @@ static int virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
{
+ bool rx_ctrl_dim_on = !!ec->use_adaptive_rx_coalesce;
struct scatterlist sgs_rx;
int i;
+ if (rx_ctrl_dim_on && !virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_VQ_NOTF_COAL))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ if (rx_ctrl_dim_on && (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs != vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs ||
+ ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames != vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (rx_ctrl_dim_on && !vi->rx_dim_enabled) {
+ vi->rx_dim_enabled = true;
+ for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
+ vi->rq[i].dim_enabled = true;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (!rx_ctrl_dim_on && vi->rx_dim_enabled) {
+ vi->rx_dim_enabled = false;
+ for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
+ vi->rq[i].dim_enabled = false;
+ }
+
+ /* Since the per-queue coalescing params can be set,
+ * we need apply the global new params even if they
+ * are not updated.
+ */
spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_usecs = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_coalesce_usecs);
vi->ctrl->coal_rx.rx_max_packets = cpu_to_le32(ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
@@ -3394,7 +3465,6 @@ static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
return -EINVAL;
}
- /* Save parameters */
vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs = ec->rx_coalesce_usecs;
vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets = ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames;
for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
@@ -3423,13 +3493,36 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
return 0;
}
-static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
- struct ethtool_coalesce *ec,
- u16 queue)
+static int virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+ struct ethtool_coalesce *ec,
+ u16 queue)
{
+ bool rx_ctrl_dim_on = !!ec->use_adaptive_rx_coalesce;
+ bool cur_rx_dim = vi->rq[queue].dim_enabled;
+ u32 max_usecs, max_packets;
int err;
spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+ max_usecs = vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs;
+ max_packets = vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets;
+ if (rx_ctrl_dim_on && (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs != max_usecs ||
+ ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames != max_packets)) {
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (rx_ctrl_dim_on && !cur_rx_dim) {
+ vi->rq[queue].dim_enabled = true;
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (!rx_ctrl_dim_on && cur_rx_dim)
+ vi->rq[queue].dim_enabled = false;
+
+ /* If no params are updated, userspace ethtool will
+ * reject the modification.
+ */
err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
ec->rx_coalesce_usecs,
ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames);
@@ -3438,19 +3531,56 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
return err;
}
- err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, queue,
- ec->tx_coalesce_usecs,
- ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
- if (err) {
- spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+ struct ethtool_coalesce *ec,
+ u16 queue)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = virtnet_send_rx_notf_coal_vq_cmds(vi, ec, queue);
+ if (err)
return err;
- }
- spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+ err = virtnet_send_tx_notf_coal_vq_cmds(vi, queue,
+ ec->tx_coalesce_usecs,
+ ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
return 0;
}
+static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
+ struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
+ struct receive_queue, dim);
+ struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
+ struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
+ struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
+ int qnum = rq - vi->rq, err;
+
+ update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode, dim->profile_ix);
+ spin_lock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+ if (update_moder.usec != vi->rq[qnum].intr_coal.max_usecs ||
+ update_moder.pkts != vi->rq[qnum].intr_coal.max_packets) {
+ err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
+ update_moder.usec,
+ update_moder.pkts);
+ if (err)
+ pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on rxq%d\n",
+ dev->name, (int)(rq - vi->rq));
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock(&vi->ctrl_lock);
+ dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
+}
+
static int virtnet_coal_params_supported(struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
{
/* usecs coalescing is supported only if VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTF_COAL
@@ -3532,6 +3662,7 @@ static int virtnet_get_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
ec->tx_coalesce_usecs = vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs;
ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames = vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets;
ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames = vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets;
+ ec->use_adaptive_rx_coalesce = vi->rx_dim_enabled;
} else {
ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames = 1;
@@ -3589,6 +3720,7 @@ static int virtnet_get_per_queue_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
ec->tx_coalesce_usecs = vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_usecs;
ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames = vi->sq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets;
ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames = vi->rq[queue].intr_coal.max_packets;
+ ec->use_adaptive_rx_coalesce = vi->rq[queue].dim_enabled;
} else {
ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames = 1;
@@ -3714,7 +3846,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_rxnfc *info)
static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops = {
.supported_coalesce_params = ETHTOOL_COALESCE_MAX_FRAMES |
- ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USECS,
+ ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USECS | ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USE_ADAPTIVE_RX,
.get_drvinfo = virtnet_get_drvinfo,
.get_link = ethtool_op_get_link,
.get_ringparam = virtnet_get_ringparam,
@@ -4308,6 +4440,9 @@ static int virtnet_alloc_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi)
virtnet_poll_tx,
napi_tx ? napi_weight : 0);
+ INIT_WORK(&vi->rq[i].dim.work, virtnet_rx_dim_work);
+ vi->rq[i].dim.mode = DIM_CQ_PERIOD_MODE_START_FROM_EQE;
+
sg_init_table(vi->rq[i].sg, ARRAY_SIZE(vi->rq[i].sg));
ewma_pkt_len_init(&vi->rq[i].mrg_avg_pkt_len);
sg_init_table(vi->sq[i].sg, ARRAY_SIZE(vi->sq[i].sg));
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread