From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch napi_tx without downing nic
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 14:47:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEuNPZZthCK9VTPiTL=oVPYNJSi2O_DyBt+SBoxrW-EHuA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEspead380Sx-5HRjAO4LYc+R2EM+-K-7cYYuus72gPXbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 2:44 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 2:34 PM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 12:14 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 10:25 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello Jason,
> > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:36 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:06 PM Willem de Bruijn
> > > > > <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Heng Qi wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 在 2023/12/20 下午10:45, Willem de Bruijn 写道:
> > > > > > > > Heng Qi wrote:
> > > > > > > >> virtio-net has two ways to switch napi_tx: one is through the
> > > > > > > >> module parameter, and the other is through coalescing parameter
> > > > > > > >> settings (provided that the nic status is down).
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Sometimes we face performance regression caused by napi_tx,
> > > > > > > >> then we need to switch napi_tx when debugging. However, the
> > > > > > > >> existing methods are a bit troublesome, such as needing to
> > > > > > > >> reload the driver or turn off the network card.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why is this troublesome? We don't need to turn off the card, it's just
> > > > > a toggling of the interface.
> > > > >
> > > > > This ends up with pretty simple code.
> > > > >
> > > > > > So try to make
> > > > > > > >> this update.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > > > > > >> Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > > > > > > The commit does not explain why it is safe to do so.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > virtnet_napi_tx_disable ensures that already scheduled tx napi ends and
> > > > > > > no new tx napi will be scheduled.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Afterwards, if the __netif_tx_lock_bh lock is held, the stack cannot
> > > > > > > send the packet.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Then we can safely toggle the weight to indicate where to clear the buffers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The tx-napi weights are not really weights: it is a boolean whether
> > > > > > > > napi is used for transmit cleaning, or whether packets are cleaned
> > > > > > > > in ndo_start_xmit.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Right.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There certainly are some subtle issues with regard to pausing/waking
> > > > > > > > queues when switching between modes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What are "subtle issues" and if there are any, we find them.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A single runtime test is not sufficient to exercise all edge cases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please don't leave it to reviewers to establish the correctness of a
> > > > > > patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > > > And instead of trying to do this, it would be much better to optimize
> > > > > the NAPI performance. Then we can drop the orphan mode.
> > > >
> > [...]
> > > > Do you mean when to call skb_orphan()? If yes, I just want to provide
> > > > more information that we also have some performance issues where the
> > > > flow control takes a bad effect, especially under some small
> > > > throughput in our production environment.
> > >
> > > I think you need to describe it in detail.
> >
> > Some of the details were described below in the last email. The
> > decreased performance happened because of flow control: the delay of
> > skb free means the delay
>
> What do you mean by delay here? Is it an interrupt delay? If yes, Does
> it work better if you simply remove
>
> virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() with virtqueue_enable_cb()? As the
> former may delay the interrupt more or less depend on the traffic.
>
> > of decreasing of sk_wmem_alloc, then it will
> > hit the limit of TSQ mechanism, finally causing transmitting slowly in
> > the TCP layer.
>
> TSQ might work better with BQL which virtio-net doesn't have right now.
>
> >
> > >
> > > > What strikes me as odd is if I restart the network, then the issue
> > > > will go with the wind. I cannot reproduce it in my testing machine.
> > > > One more thing: if I force skb_orphan() the current skb in every
> > > > start_xmit(), it could also solve the issue but not in a proper way.
> > > > After all, it drops the flow control... :S
> > >
> > > Yes, that's the known issue.
Just to clarify, I mean the skb_orphan() drop flow control is a known
issue. Not the restart...
Thanks
> >
> > Really? Did you have some numbers or have some discussion links to
> > share? I failed to reproduce on my testing machine, probably the short
> > rtt is the key/obstacle.
>
> I basically mean it is a known side effect of skb_orphan() as it might
> decrease sk_wmem_alloc too early.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> >
> > @Eric, it seems it still exists.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jason
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jason
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The napi_tx and non-napi code paths differ in how they handle at least
> > > > > > the following structures:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. skb: non-napi orphans these in ndo_start_xmit. Without napi this is
> > > > > > needed as delay until the next ndo_start_xmit and thus completion is
> > > > > > unbounded.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When switching to napi mode, orphaned skbs may now be cleaned by the
> > > > > > napi handler. This is indeed safe.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When switching from napi to non-napi, the unbound latency resurfaces.
> > > > > > It is a small edge case, and I think a potentially acceptable risk, if
> > > > > > the user of this knob is aware of the risk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. virtqueue callback ("interrupt" masking). The non-napi path enables
> > > > > > the interrupt (disables the mask) when available descriptors falls
> > > > > > beneath a low watermark, and reenables when it recovers above a high
> > > > > > watermark. Napi disables when napi is scheduled, and reenables on
> > > > > > napi complete.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3. dev_queue->state (QUEUE_STATE_DRV_XOFF). if the ring falls below
> > > > > > a low watermark, the driver stops the stack for queuing more packets.
> > > > > > In napi mode, it schedules napi to clean packets. See the calls to
> > > > > > netif_xmit_stopped, netif_stop_subqueue, netif_start_subqueue and
> > > > > > netif_tx_wake_queue.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Some if this can be assumed safe by looking at existing analogous
> > > > > > code, such as the queue stop/start in virtnet_tx_resize.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But that all virtqueue callback and dev_queue->state transitions are
> > > > > > correct when switching between modes at runtime is not trivial to
> > > > > > establish, deserves some thought and explanation in the commit
> > > > > > message.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-25 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-20 8:07 [PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch napi_tx without downing nic Heng Qi
2023-12-20 14:45 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-12-21 5:18 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-21 15:05 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-12-22 2:35 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-22 8:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-25 4:12 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-25 8:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-26 3:32 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-25 2:24 ` Jason Xing
2023-12-25 4:14 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-25 6:33 ` Jason Xing
2023-12-25 6:44 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-25 6:47 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2023-12-25 7:52 ` Jason Xing
2023-12-21 3:02 ` Zhu Yanjun
2023-12-21 5:20 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-21 14:34 ` Zhu Yanjun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACGkMEuNPZZthCK9VTPiTL=oVPYNJSi2O_DyBt+SBoxrW-EHuA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).