From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] vringh: remove vringh_iov and unite to vringh_kiov
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:36:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEvmZ5MEX4WMa3JhzT404C2uhsNk0nnkYBRtvLPhNTSzHQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANXvt5rfXDYa0nLzKW5-Q-hjhw-19npXVneqBO1TcsariU6rWg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 3:06 PM Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp> wrote:
>
> 2022年12月27日(火) 15:04 Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:25 AM Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp> wrote:
> > >
> > > struct vringh_iov is defined to hold userland addresses. However, to use
> > > common function, __vring_iov, finally the vringh_iov converts to the
> > > vringh_kiov with simple cast. It includes compile time check code to make
> > > sure it can be cast correctly.
> > >
> > > To simplify the code, this patch removes the struct vringh_iov and unifies
> > > APIs to struct vringh_kiov.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>
> >
> > While at this, I wonder if we need to go further, that is, switch to
> > using an iov iterator instead of a vringh customized one.
> I didn't see the iov iterator yet, thank you for informing me.
> Is that iov_iter? https://lwn.net/Articles/625077/
Exactly.
Thanks
> > Thanks
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 32 ++++++------------------------
> > > include/linux/vringh.h | 45 ++++--------------------------------------
> > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > > index 828c29306565..aa3cd27d2384 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > > @@ -691,8 +691,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_init_user);
> > > * calling vringh_iov_cleanup() to release the memory, even on error!
> > > */
> > > int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
> > > - struct vringh_iov *riov,
> > > - struct vringh_iov *wiov,
> > > + struct vringh_kiov *riov,
> > > + struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
> > > bool (*getrange)(struct vringh *vrh,
> > > u64 addr, struct vringh_range *r),
> > > u16 *head)
> > > @@ -708,26 +708,6 @@ int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
> > > if (err == vrh->vring.num)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > - /* We need the layouts to be the identical for this to work */
> > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct vringh_kiov) != sizeof(struct vringh_iov));
> > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, iov) !=
> > > - offsetof(struct vringh_iov, iov));
> > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, i) !=
> > > - offsetof(struct vringh_iov, i));
> > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, used) !=
> > > - offsetof(struct vringh_iov, used));
> > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, max_num) !=
> > > - offsetof(struct vringh_iov, max_num));
> > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct iovec) != sizeof(struct kvec));
> > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct iovec, iov_base) !=
> > > - offsetof(struct kvec, iov_base));
> > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct iovec, iov_len) !=
> > > - offsetof(struct kvec, iov_len));
> > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(((struct iovec *)NULL)->iov_base)
> > > - != sizeof(((struct kvec *)NULL)->iov_base));
> > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(((struct iovec *)NULL)->iov_len)
> > > - != sizeof(((struct kvec *)NULL)->iov_len));
> > > -
> > > *head = err;
> > > err = __vringh_iov(vrh, *head, (struct vringh_kiov *)riov,
> > > (struct vringh_kiov *)wiov,
> > > @@ -740,14 +720,14 @@ int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_getdesc_user);
> > >
> > > /**
> > > - * vringh_iov_pull_user - copy bytes from vring_iov.
> > > + * vringh_iov_pull_user - copy bytes from vring_kiov.
> > > * @riov: the riov as passed to vringh_getdesc_user() (updated as we consume)
> > > * @dst: the place to copy.
> > > * @len: the maximum length to copy.
> > > *
> > > * Returns the bytes copied <= len or a negative errno.
> > > */
> > > -ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_iov *riov, void *dst, size_t len)
> > > +ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_kiov *riov, void *dst, size_t len)
> > > {
> > > return vringh_iov_xfer(NULL, (struct vringh_kiov *)riov,
> > > dst, len, xfer_from_user);
> > > @@ -755,14 +735,14 @@ ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_iov *riov, void *dst, size_t len)
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_iov_pull_user);
> > >
> > > /**
> > > - * vringh_iov_push_user - copy bytes into vring_iov.
> > > + * vringh_iov_push_user - copy bytes into vring_kiov.
> > > * @wiov: the wiov as passed to vringh_getdesc_user() (updated as we consume)
> > > * @src: the place to copy from.
> > > * @len: the maximum length to copy.
> > > *
> > > * Returns the bytes copied <= len or a negative errno.
> > > */
> > > -ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_iov *wiov,
> > > +ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
> > > const void *src, size_t len)
> > > {
> > > return vringh_iov_xfer(NULL, (struct vringh_kiov *)wiov,
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/vringh.h b/include/linux/vringh.h
> > > index 1991a02c6431..733d948e8123 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/vringh.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/vringh.h
> > > @@ -79,18 +79,6 @@ struct vringh_range {
> > > u64 offset;
> > > };
> > >
> > > -/**
> > > - * struct vringh_iov - iovec mangler.
> > > - *
> > > - * Mangles iovec in place, and restores it.
> > > - * Remaining data is iov + i, of used - i elements.
> > > - */
> > > -struct vringh_iov {
> > > - struct iovec *iov;
> > > - size_t consumed; /* Within iov[i] */
> > > - unsigned i, used, max_num;
> > > -};
> > > -
> > > /**
> > > * struct vringh_kiov - kvec mangler.
> > > *
> > > @@ -113,44 +101,19 @@ int vringh_init_user(struct vringh *vrh, u64 features,
> > > vring_avail_t __user *avail,
> > > vring_used_t __user *used);
> > >
> > > -static inline void vringh_iov_init(struct vringh_iov *iov,
> > > - struct iovec *iovec, unsigned num)
> > > -{
> > > - iov->used = iov->i = 0;
> > > - iov->consumed = 0;
> > > - iov->max_num = num;
> > > - iov->iov = iovec;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static inline void vringh_iov_reset(struct vringh_iov *iov)
> > > -{
> > > - iov->iov[iov->i].iov_len += iov->consumed;
> > > - iov->iov[iov->i].iov_base -= iov->consumed;
> > > - iov->consumed = 0;
> > > - iov->i = 0;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static inline void vringh_iov_cleanup(struct vringh_iov *iov)
> > > -{
> > > - if (iov->max_num & VRINGH_IOV_ALLOCATED)
> > > - kfree(iov->iov);
> > > - iov->max_num = iov->used = iov->i = iov->consumed = 0;
> > > - iov->iov = NULL;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > /* Convert a descriptor into iovecs. */
> > > int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
> > > - struct vringh_iov *riov,
> > > - struct vringh_iov *wiov,
> > > + struct vringh_kiov *riov,
> > > + struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
> > > bool (*getrange)(struct vringh *vrh,
> > > u64 addr, struct vringh_range *r),
> > > u16 *head);
> > >
> > > /* Copy bytes from readable vsg, consuming it (and incrementing wiov->i). */
> > > -ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_iov *riov, void *dst, size_t len);
> > > +ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_kiov *riov, void *dst, size_t len);
> > >
> > > /* Copy bytes into writable vsg, consuming it (and incrementing wiov->i). */
> > > -ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_iov *wiov,
> > > +ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
> > > const void *src, size_t len);
> > >
> > > /* Mark a descriptor as used. */
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> >
> Best,
> Shunsuke
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-28 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-27 2:25 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Introduce a vringh accessor for IO memory Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] vringh: fix a typo in comments for vringh_kiov Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] vringh: remove vringh_iov and unite to vringh_kiov Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 6:04 ` Jason Wang
2022-12-27 7:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-27 7:13 ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 7:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-27 7:57 ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 7:05 ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-28 6:36 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2023-01-11 3:26 ` Shunsuke Mie
2023-01-11 5:54 ` Jason Wang
2023-01-11 6:19 ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] tools/virtio: convert to new vringh user APIs Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] vringh: unify the APIs for all accessors Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 7:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-27 7:49 ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 10:22 ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 14:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-28 2:24 ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-28 7:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-11 4:10 ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] tools/virtio: convert to use new unified vringh APIs Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] caif_virtio: convert to " Shunsuke Mie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACGkMEvmZ5MEX4WMa3JhzT404C2uhsNk0nnkYBRtvLPhNTSzHQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mie@igel.co.jp \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).