Re: [PATCH RESEND] netvsc: transfer lower device max tso size

[Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 9:18 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 09:04:20 +0800 Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:28 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 14:17:55 +0800 Cindy Lu wrote:
> > > > Subject: [PATCH RESEND] netvsc: transfer lower device max tso size
> > >
> > > You say RESEND but I don't see a link to previous posting anywhere.
>
> Someone should respond to this part, please.
>
Hi Jakub,
sorry for the confusion. I previously sent this mail
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250718060615.237986-1-lulu@redhat.com/)
to the wrong mailing list, so I'm resended it here.
I've also submitted a v2 of this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250718082909.243488-1-lulu@redhat.com/
Sorry again for the mix-up.
thanks

cindy

> > > I'd rather we didn't extend the magic behavior of hyperv/netvsc any
> > > further.
> >
> > Are you referring to the netdev coupling model of the VF acceleration?
>
> Yes, it tries to apply whole bunch of policy automatically in
> the kernel.
>
> > > We have enough problems with it.
> >
> > But this fixes a real problem, otherwise nested VM performance will be
> > broken due to the GSO software segmentation.
>
> Perhaps, possibly, a migration plan can be devised, away from the
> netvsc model, so we don't have to deal with nuggets of joy like:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1752870014-28909-1-git-send-email-haiyangz@linux.microsoft.com/
>