From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
To: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: "Oliver Neukum" <oliver@neukum.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
"Marius Bjørnstad Kotsbak" <marius.kotsbak@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: qmi_wwan: fix Oops while disconnecting
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:08:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVOPjFSS6Sv6AUCSAs4nywR045QhjYAbN8g6U3adsUbujw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hatzhn0k.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:
>
> True, but irrelevant. The pointer is either valid or NULL. We don't
> need to care about synchronizing the exact time it is set to NULL.
>
> The locking in cdc-wdm will ensure that the pointer is valid while it is
> in use by .manage_power, because usbnet_disconnect is prevented from
> continuing with free_netdev() while any caller of .manage_power is
> running.
What I mean is that the situation is just what moving the set to NULL
is doing.
>> So it is only the sync mechanism that works on the race even the check is
>> added in the patch. Putting usb_set_intfdata(, NULL) after driver_info->unbind
>> should be OK, and it is a general solution for the problem.
>
> There is no problem wrt qmi_wwan and intfdata as long as the NULL test
> is added to .manage_power.
It depends on the ARCH or compiler.
Considered there is not any locking/memory barrier between the set to NULL
and read the pointer, also no ACCESS_ONCE on read or store the pointer,
reading in .manage_power may see a invalid pointer if the CPU doesn't
support Store Atomicity or the compiler does a byte-at-a-time optimization
on the store[1].
So why not take the correct way in theory? also it is a general solution,
and we can document its usage.
[1], Paul mentioned it in the previous discussion
http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/6/280
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-22 9:11 [PATCH net] net: qmi_wwan: fix Oops while disconnecting Bjørn Mork
[not found] ` <1340356279-3124-1-git-send-email-bjorn-yOkvZcmFvRU@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-22 12:45 ` Ming Lei
2012-06-22 13:42 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-06-22 15:09 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <CACVXFVOQ3Uh50iJxboD-7=+J55MAW8Wjt3iY0WahauO2PrxT4w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-22 16:18 ` Bjørn Mork
[not found] ` <877guzl3qz.fsf-lbf33ChDnrE/G1V5fR+Y7Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-22 16:52 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <CACVXFVNCAsM5NihpAFLU5rGo5ynr3=XU5gw7nM5Fi2mrrX+hKA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-22 17:31 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-06-23 3:32 ` Ming Lei
2012-06-23 3:39 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <CACVXFVMJSrLjOyKUnZWr3CY2HJT6Wfm6AugZOhSCRUubV0hNMQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-23 8:45 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-06-23 14:55 ` Ming Lei
2012-06-23 15:32 ` Bjørn Mork
[not found] ` <87hau2hwna.fsf-lbf33ChDnrE/G1V5fR+Y7Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-23 20:55 ` Oliver Neukum
[not found] ` <201206232255.08319.oliver-GvhC2dPhHPQdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-24 9:34 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-06-24 12:13 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-06-24 17:47 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-06-25 3:37 ` Ming Lei
2012-06-25 6:15 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-06-25 7:15 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <CACVXFVNUv6w5OjSZdQDbcLEPpDU5vO_Nmarm+fAfh0RkkL_hdg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-25 12:10 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-06-26 7:23 ` Ming Lei
2012-06-28 8:35 ` Oliver Neukum
[not found] ` <201206281035.19964.oneukum-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-28 8:55 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-06-28 9:11 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <CACVXFVN3wJ3NWxSGj-yWCgtDE_sgJT5CZYHwYUWk1MxkphcsTg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-25 7:24 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-06-25 8:08 ` Ming Lei [this message]
[not found] ` <CACVXFVOPjFSS6Sv6AUCSAs4nywR045QhjYAbN8g6U3adsUbujw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-25 8:27 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-06-28 8:36 ` Bjørn Mork
[not found] ` <87lij7de8u.fsf-lbf33ChDnrE/G1V5fR+Y7Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-28 8:40 ` Oliver Neukum
[not found] ` <201206281040.55402.oliver-GvhC2dPhHPQdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-28 23:54 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACVXFVOPjFSS6Sv6AUCSAs4nywR045QhjYAbN8g6U3adsUbujw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marius.kotsbak@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).