From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Tom Herbert" <therbert@google.com>,
"Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@google.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: introduce tcp_try_coalesce
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:13:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADVnQyngwym7z_zSi8h2U_1e_wVCwGMPZScywWFWM2AYvxyqjw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335201102.5205.28.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>
> commit c8628155ece3 (tcp: reduce out_of_order memory use) took care of
> coalescing tcp segments provided by legacy devices (linear skbs)
>
> We extend this idea to fragged skbs, as their truesize can be heavy.
>
> ixgbe for example uses 256+1024+PAGE_SIZE/2 = 3328 bytes per segment.
>
> Use this coalescing strategy for receive queue too.
>
> This contributes to reduce number of tcp collapses, at minimal cost, and
> reduces memory overhead and packets drops.
The mechanics look solid, but I'm a little concerned about the
potential added overhead for the new case where tcp_try_coalesce()
does a skb_copy_bits() for in-order data that it is coalescing at the
end of the sk_receive_queue. Do you have any performance numbers for
this case to help suggest whether this added copy is a concern?
neal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-23 17:11 [PATCH net-next] tcp: introduce tcp_try_coalesce Eric Dumazet
2012-04-24 1:13 ` Neal Cardwell [this message]
2012-04-24 2:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-24 2:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-24 2:39 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-04-24 2:46 ` David Miller
2012-04-24 2:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-24 3:34 ` [PATCH net-next] tcp: tcp_try_coalesce returns a boolean Eric Dumazet
2012-04-24 3:37 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADVnQyngwym7z_zSi8h2U_1e_wVCwGMPZScywWFWM2AYvxyqjw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=maze@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).