From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] net: diag: fix a potential security issue
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 14:51:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_c22nQ628LnxhdQabkbNNiuYxtYEwjTs6ToiWj4sYuBmQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+n=MMUDdjDm4SQfEfQvFM+PgSKCrtDzBY=OiwsiyvYMg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:27 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:32:23 +0800
>>>
>>> > This patch is to void the potential security issue that the family
>>> > or protocol modules are autoloaded when requesting _diag module by
>>> > not requesting _diag module if the family or protocol is not added
>>> > or registered in sock_diag and inet_diag.
>>> >
>>> > As the repost of the patch '[PATCH net] sock_diag: request _diag
>>> > module only when the family or proto has been registered', this
>>> > patchset fixes the compiling errors when INET is not set, and
>>> > also split into two patches to make it clear to review.
>>>
>>> This makes no sense to me.
>>>
>>> Any user can just open a socket() in the appropriate protocol
>>> family to cause the module to be loaded.
>>>
>>> If someone wants modules to not be loaded, block them using
>>> traditional module loading infrastructure mechanisms. Or
>>> don't load the module at all.
>>>
>>> Sorry I am not applying this.
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I'm still thinking it's not good after 'ss', sctp, dccp,
>> af_packet ... are just loaded, in which case, no one actually
>> open any socket with these family or proto.
>>
>> I talked with Marcelo before, one scenario as he said:
>>
>> Imagine a customer generates a sosreport on their system, and
>> with that, it loads sctp module. From then on, if their firewall
>> doesn't block incoming packets for sctp, they may be prone to some
>> remotely triggerable issue on sctp code, without even actually using
>> sctp.
>
> For that reason, we have disabled autoloading of SCTP.
> ( removing the
> MODULE_ALIAS("net-pf-" __stringify(PF_INET) "-proto-132");
> MODULE_ALIAS("net-pf-" __stringify(PF_INET6) "-proto-132");
> )
> root must modprobe the module before it is accessible.
>
> However inet_diag is a way to have the module loaded anyway.
>
> This is why I like your patch Xin.
>
> David is only saying that your patch alone is not enough to prevent a
> user to use socket() to autoload SCTP.
Using socket() to autoload SCTP should be fine, cause users would
use SCTP, no ?
"ss" doesn't mean users intend to use SCTP, "ss" may make users
not aware that SCTP module would be loaded, unlike socket(SCTP).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-21 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-19 7:32 [PATCH net 0/2] net: diag: fix a potential security issue Xin Long
2017-10-19 7:32 ` [PATCH net 1/2] sock_diag: request _diag module only when the family has been registered Xin Long
2017-10-19 7:32 ` [PATCH net 2/2] inet_diag: request _diag module only when the proto " Xin Long
2017-10-21 1:27 ` [PATCH net 0/2] net: diag: fix a potential security issue David Miller
[not found] ` <CADvbK_fWmmC3ggpoT--Pxk3GxZ8Gq_rbdFGTuXk-BuTHTO=eXw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-10-21 6:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-10-21 6:51 ` Xin Long [this message]
2017-10-21 7:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-10-21 8:45 ` Xin Long
2017-10-21 9:45 ` Xin Long
2017-10-21 11:16 ` David Miller
2017-10-21 11:14 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADvbK_c22nQ628LnxhdQabkbNNiuYxtYEwjTs6ToiWj4sYuBmQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).