From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xin Long Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] sctp: add support for generating stream reconf chunks Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 02:27:09 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20170109124325.GB20973@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> <20170109.105301.469495957021068521.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Neil Horman , network dev , linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Vlad Yasevich To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f194.google.com ([209.85.220.194]:35515 "EHLO mail-qk0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1163274AbdAIS1P (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:27:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170109.105301.469495957021068521.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:53 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Neil Horman > Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 07:43:25 -0500 > >> These all look reasonably good, but it seems before we accept them, >> there should be an additional patch that actually makes use of the code. >> I presume that is forthcomming? > > This all comes from my asking that the original huge set of patches be > split up. > > People always just rush this kind of work and never think about laying > out the resubmission properly. > > One should always only submit new interfaces along with an actual use > because only with a use can we properly review whether the new > interface is good or not. I was trying to keep the same order with rfc, but it seems not a good idea, will resplit, thanks.