netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>,
	Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tipc: use rcu dereference functions properly
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:33:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_emyKTg8=ye8n2ZTBx0QFK9gPL02aVDfn44DuyUTP-ofw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190702.150811.1940085234903099096.davem@davemloft.net>

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 6:08 AM David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue,  2 Jul 2019 00:54:55 +0800
>
> > For these places are protected by rcu_read_lock, we change from
> > rcu_dereference_rtnl to rcu_dereference, as there is no need to
> > check if rtnl lock is held.
> >
> > For these places are protected by rtnl_lock, we change from
> > rcu_dereference_rtnl to rtnl_dereference/rcu_dereference_protected,
> > as no extra memory barriers are needed under rtnl_lock() which also
> > protects tn->bearer_list[] and dev->tipc_ptr/b->media_ptr updating.
> >
> > rcu_dereference_rtnl will be only used in the places where it could
> > be under rcu_read_lock or rtnl_lock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
>
> In the cases where RTNL is held, even if rcu_read_lock() is also taken,
> we should use rtnl_dereference() because that avoids the READ_ONCE().
Right, that's what I did in this patch.

But for the places where it's sometimes called under rtnl_lock() only and
sometimes called under rcu_read_lock() only, like tipc_udp_is_known_peer()
and tipc_udp_rcast_add(), I kept rcu_dereference_rtnl(). makes sense?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-03  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-01 16:54 [PATCH net-next] tipc: use rcu dereference functions properly Xin Long
2019-07-02 22:08 ` David Miller
2019-07-03  8:33   ` Xin Long [this message]
2019-07-06  6:48     ` Xin Long
2019-07-06 22:15       ` David Miller
2019-07-07 20:19         ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADvbK_emyKTg8=ye8n2ZTBx0QFK9gPL02aVDfn44DuyUTP-ofw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).