From: "H.K. Jerry Chu" <hkjerry.chu@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Bergmann <alex@linlab.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tcp: Wrong timeout for SYN segments
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:34:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFbMe2Pgjbttt+Z3RQ9KL05=GHqZYk5ubNH2G1-EUn_f_RBaEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120825084819.GD430@linlab.net>
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Alexander Bergmann <alex@linlab.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:42:31PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> Alex, this patch doesn't apply, it was completely corrupted by your email
>> client.
>>
>> Make a fresh submission, with this fixed. But before you do, email the
>> patch to yourself and make sure you can actually apply the patch you
>> receive in your inbox. Because that's exactly what I'm going to have
>> to do.
>
> Sorry I messed it up the last time. This time I've double checked as
> you suggested. I'll keep that in mind.
>
> From 11a292b1cff772f930a02fda02d5b741f8ea5033 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alexander Bergmann <alex@linlab.net>
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:09:49 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] tcp: Increase timeout for SYN segments
>
> Commit 9ad7c049 changed the initRTO from 3secs to 1sec in accordance to
> RFC6298 (former RFC2988bis). This reduced the time till the last SYN
> retransmission packet gets sent from 93secs to 31secs.
>
> RFC1122 is stating that the retransmission should be done for at least 3
> minutes, but this seems to be quite high.
>
> "However, the values of R1 and R2 may be different for SYN
> and data segments. In particular, R2 for a SYN segment MUST
> be set large enough to provide retransmission of the segment
> for at least 3 minutes. The application can close the
> connection (i.e., give up on the open attempt) sooner, of
> course."
>
> This patch increases the value of TCP_SYN_RETRIES to the value of 6,
> providing a retransmission window of 63secs.
>
> The comments for SYN and SYNACK retries have also been updated to
> describe the current settings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Bergmann <alex@linlab.net>
> ---
> include/net/tcp.h | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
> index 1f000ff..d43d6b3 100644
> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
> @@ -98,11 +98,21 @@ extern void tcp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int state, int timeo);
> * 15 is ~13-30min depending on RTO.
> */
>
> -#define TCP_SYN_RETRIES 5 /* number of times to retry active opening a
> - * connection: ~180sec is RFC minimum */
> +#define TCP_SYN_RETRIES 6 /*
> + * This is how many retries it does to active
> + * opening a connection.
> + * RFC1122 says the minimum retry MUST be at
> + * least 180secs. Nevertheless this value is
> + * corresponding to 63secs of retransmission
> + * with the current initial RTO.
> + */
>
> -#define TCP_SYNACK_RETRIES 5 /* number of times to retry passive opening a
> - * connection: ~180sec is RFC minimum */
> +#define TCP_SYNACK_RETRIES 5 /*
> + * This is how may retries it does to passive
> + * opening a connection.
> + * This is corresponding to 31secs of
> + * retransmission with the current initial RTO.
IMHO 31secs seem a little short. Why not change it to 6 as well because 63
secs still beats 93secs with 3sec initRTO and 5 retries.
Jerry
> + */
>
> #define TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN (60*HZ) /* how long to wait to destroy TIME-WAIT
> * state, about 60 seconds */
> --
> 1.7.8.6
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-29 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-21 23:29 [PATCH 1/1] tcp: Wrong timeout for SYN segments Alex Bergmann
2012-08-22 8:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22 8:48 ` Alex Bergmann
2012-08-22 8:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22 9:29 ` Alex Bergmann
2012-08-22 9:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22 10:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22 17:29 ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2012-08-22 16:44 ` H.K. Jerry Chu
[not found] ` <CAFbMe2M7ekc94bQk7vTS1LhScPd49VZ-zKOCUXhqwxXtL-nkuA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-08-23 11:58 ` Alex Bergmann
2012-08-23 12:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-23 12:35 ` David Laight
2012-08-23 12:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-23 12:37 ` Alex Bergmann
2012-08-23 12:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-24 12:17 ` Alex Bergmann
2012-08-24 17:42 ` David Miller
2012-08-25 8:48 ` Alexander Bergmann
2012-08-25 9:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-28 8:44 ` Carsten Wolff
[not found] ` <1346414260.2591.8.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
2012-08-31 12:48 ` Alexander Bergmann
2012-08-31 13:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-31 19:42 ` David Miller
2012-08-31 19:47 ` David Miller
2012-08-29 4:34 ` H.K. Jerry Chu [this message]
2012-08-29 8:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-29 17:25 ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2012-08-30 13:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-30 16:45 ` David Miller
2012-08-30 18:04 ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2012-08-30 17:59 ` H.K. Jerry Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFbMe2Pgjbttt+Z3RQ9KL05=GHqZYk5ubNH2G1-EUn_f_RBaEQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=hkjerry.chu@gmail.com \
--cc=alex@linlab.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).