From: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] the first bind() of an AF_PACKET socket to an interface is slow
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 23:24:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG-2HqWLGNg5RXLCFq5YN3NKmQLWU9N2mLgMZ3d3kCSs7cPx-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5339CD1B.7040708@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/31/2014 08:43 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm observing some strange behavior using bind().
>>
>> For any given process, and any given interface, the first time I bind
>> a socket to the interface it takes a very long time. Subsequent binds
>> to the same interface in the same process are instantaneous.
>>
>> The time it takes seems independent of the interface, so also affects
>> the loopback interface, but binding to all interfaces (ifindex=0) is
>> instantaneous.
>>
>> It is also peculiar to note that the time it takes to bind is
>> seemingly randomly chosen on my machine from 9ms, 19ms, 29ms, 39ms,
>> 49ms and 59 ms, but I never observed any other values.
>>
>> The attached test program illustrates the problem, binding to
>> ifindex=0 (all) and ifindex=1 (loopback).
>>
>> Sample run:
>> # strace -f -T -ebind ./bind
>> bind(3, {sa_family=AF_PACKET, proto=0x800, if0, pkttype=0x40 /* ? */,
>> addr(6)={1328, ffffffffffff}, 20) = 0 <0.000036>
>> bind(3, {sa_family=AF_PACKET, proto=0x800, if0, pkttype=0x40 /* ? */,
>> addr(6)={1328, ffffffffffff}, 20) = 0 <0.000033>
>> bind(3, {sa_family=AF_PACKET, proto=0x800, if1, pkttype=0x40 /* ? */,
>> addr(6)={1328, ffffffffffff}, 20) = 0 <0.059706>
>> bind(3, {sa_family=AF_PACKET, proto=0x800, if1, pkttype=0x40 /* ? */,
>> addr(6)={1328, ffffffffffff}, 20) = 0 <0.000111>
>>
>>
>> Can anyone enlighten me to what is going on? Is this expected behavior
>> or a bug? Any suggestions for a work-around?
>
>
> Expected behaviour as you can save in some cases a synchronize_net() call:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=902fefb82ef72a50c78cb4a20cc954b037a98d1c
Great, that explains what I need to do. Thanks!
Cheers,
Tom
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-31 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-31 18:43 [BUG?] the first bind() of an AF_PACKET socket to an interface is slow Tom Gundersen
2014-03-31 20:16 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-03-31 21:24 ` Tom Gundersen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAG-2HqWLGNg5RXLCFq5YN3NKmQLWU9N2mLgMZ3d3kCSs7cPx-Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=teg@jklm.no \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).