From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Decotigny Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/9] kbuild: document RPS/XPS network Kconfig options Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:04:58 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20111116.215808.299077226767455988.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com, jpirko@redhat.com, joe@perches.com, szymon@janc.net.pl, rick.jones2@hp.com, AAbdulla@nvidia.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:46338 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755466Ab1KQDFV (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:05:21 -0500 Received: by ywt32 with SMTP id 32so497446ywt.19 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:05:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111116.215808.299077226767455988.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:58 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: David Decotigny > Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:39:05 -0800 > >> This adds a description of RPS/XPS options and allow them to be >> changed at make menuconfig time. > > These aren't meant to be selectable. Ok. I only needed this for our compilation scripts in order to make sure I didn't have my CONFIG_* wrong in patch 4/9. I don't need this patch anymore. David, should I re-send an updated v7 version of this series with this patch removed? Or is it Ok if I simply mark this patch as rejected in patchwork and stick to patch series v6?