From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Brian Lilly <brian@crystalfontz.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@mentor.com>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@freescale.com>,
Fugang Duan <B38611@freescale.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: i.MX28 based system losing eth0 on boot
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 11:39:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGVrzcZBPmcmZAdcmFd7mZ97hsHe0UTArpo0ta0Si3sdfYuSgA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140506181151.GU28564@pengutronix.de>
2014-05-06 11:11 GMT-07:00 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
> Hello Brian,
>
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:44:34AM -0700, Brian Lilly wrote:
>> With commit a264b981f2c76e281ef27e7232774bf6c54ec865 we're having eth0
>> come up, then brought right back down with an MDIO rx timeout moments
>> after. Adding back in the removed code keeps the interface alive and
>> it's working afterward without trouble. I've tested the re-inserted
>> code in 3.12, 3.14 without issue on our boards.
> So you can reliably trigger that problem? You're just doing
>
> ifconfig eth0 1.2.3.4 up
>
> (or equivalent) and the interface goes down without further
> interference with the above mentioned commit? The exact error you're
> seeing is
>
> MDIO read timeout
>
> (with some prefix saying something about fec and eth0 I think)?
>
> This error is also present with a264b981f2 reverted, just doesn't affect
> eth0 being functional? Does the timeout always happen, or only on
> specific addresses?
>
> This is not a proper fix, but does it help to increment FEC_MII_TIMEOUT?
>
>> Is there something else that can be done to prevent the MDIO timeouts?
>> We are using basically the same schematic for networking as the
>> imx28evk.
> Hard to say, but assuming it works just fine on the imx28evk for you,
> too, there seems to be some hardware difference that makes your machine
> fail. (That doesn't mean it's not fixable in software.)
>
> I don't know if a mdio read error is intended to make the device go
> down, maybe one the the netdev guys can answer that.
What is likely happening is that you are failing auto-negotiation
(phy_read_status return < 0) because of the MDIO timeout, so we never
call netif_carrier_on(), and so the link is not UP. The reason for
that could be a genuine MDIO read timeout from the bus, or your PHY
might be slightly bogus and need more time to complete
auto-negotiation, or anything that ressembles that. There is some
special MDIO timeout logic in the FEC driver that I would seriously
audit as it seems to be bogus, or it seems at the very least that the
MDIO timeouts are known and need to be worked around.
> Assuming that it's not intended, instrument the code, find out how that
> timeout makes your device go down and find the wrong branch. I'd start
> with adding stackdumps when the mdio timeout happens and when
> fec_enet_start_xmit is called with fep->link == 0.
I would also double check fec_enet_adjust_link() which seems to handle
a case where we have a MDIO bus timeout, and tries to do something
that looks incorrect to me. PHY_HALTED basically corresponds to
phy_stop() being called, which means that you won't be running the
adjust_link callback, so I wonder how this situation is actually
happening.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-06 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-06 16:44 i.MX28 based system losing eth0 on boot Brian Lilly
2014-05-06 18:11 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-05-06 18:39 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2014-05-06 19:12 ` Brian Lilly
2014-05-06 19:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-05-06 21:40 ` Brian Lilly
2014-05-06 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-05-06 22:27 ` Brian Lilly
2014-05-07 3:07 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-05-07 19:16 ` Brian Lilly
2014-05-07 19:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-05-07 19:51 ` Brian Lilly
2014-05-08 1:47 ` fugang.duan
2014-05-07 3:17 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-05-07 19:00 ` Brian Lilly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGVrzcZBPmcmZAdcmFd7mZ97hsHe0UTArpo0ta0Si3sdfYuSgA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=B38611@freescale.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@freescale.com \
--cc=brian@crystalfontz.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=jim_baxter@mentor.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).