Re: [patch v1, kernel 3.2.1] RTNETLINK adjusting values of min_ifinfo_dump_size

["Štefan Gula" <steweg@ynet.sk>]

2012/1/26 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
> From: Stefan Gula <steweg@ynet.sk>
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:43:15 +0100 (CET)
>
>> From: Stefan Gula <steweg@gmail.com>
>>
>> This patch extends the rtnetlink.c. The problem is that calcit, which
>> returns the value min_ifinfo_dump_size, is called without ability to
>> get device info as well (struct net_device *dev is not accessible from
>> it). This create a problem if required size of struct sk_buff *skb is
>> not enough big to comply with all data returned by fill_info function
0>> for the interface that required size can vary over time, e.g. some
>> dynamic structures will be putted to skb like hlists or lists. To do
>> this patch extends the do_setlink function with recalculating of
>> min_ifinfo_dump_size accordingly to device type and get_size
>> functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Gula <steweg@gmail.com>
>
> This commit message is terrible, and the reason I know it's terrible
> is because even after reading it I still had to go read the code
> in order to understand what your change even does or why it's even
> necessary.
>
> How about this:
>
>        Setting link parameters on a netdevice changes the value
>        of if_nlmsg_size(), therefore it is necessary to recalculate
>        min_ifinfo_dump_size.
>
Sound good... do I have to resubmit the patch with the correct description?