From: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
ast@fb.com, Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit
Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 01:57:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHgaXd+2vF=d5zpWTg+a=vSnv2ZA+8LCR_MXT_MDKn4r2s8sig@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170506.143816.2259768618578706384.davem@davemloft.net>
Thanks David.
Hi all,
I have two questions about the code at arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c.
1. At line 708, " const u8 r1 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_1]; /* r1: struct
sk_buff *skb */ ".
Why is this code using BPF_REG_1 before saving it? As far as I
know, BPF_REG_1 has pointer to bpf program context and this code
clearly is overwriting that pointer which makes that pointer useless
for future usage. It clearly looks like a bug.
2. At line 256, " emit(A64_LDR64(prg, tmp, r3), ctx); ".
This line of code is used to load an array( of pointers ) element,
where r3 is used as an index of that array. Shouldn't it be be
arithmetic left shifted by 3 or multiplied by 8 to get the right
address in that array of pointers ?
Apologies if any of the above question is stupid to ask.
Best,
Shubham
Best,
Shubham Bansal
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 12:08 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 22:18:16 +0530
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Thanks for the last reply about the testing of eBPF JIT.
>>
>> I have one issue though, I am not able to find what BPF_ABS and
>> BPF_IND instruction does exactly.
>
> They are not instructions, they are modifiers for the BPF_LD
> instruction which indicate an SKB load is to be performed.
>
> You never need to ask what a BPF instruction does, it is clear
> defined in the BPF interperter found in kernel/bpf/core.c
>
> Look for the case statement LD_ABS_W and friends in __bpf_prog_run().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-06 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-30 10:38 arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit Shubham Bansal
2017-01-30 21:57 ` Kees Cook
[not found] ` <CAHgaXd+nj69n-Xf46N=4M-j-0hKHVrrLfsvRZCG=2CCAtVF6ZA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAGXu5j+NSLomuSgD40kys+pWc+J9aB6Bbk_gSP9Lp_ScimQn_w@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-01 13:01 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-02-01 13:06 ` Fwd: " Shubham Bansal
2017-02-06 11:52 ` Shubham Bansal
[not found] ` <76621BFF-B30B-4417-AB2B-DB21CA6092D9@netronome.com>
2017-02-03 7:04 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-02-03 8:25 ` nick viljoen
2017-02-08 7:29 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-02-08 19:41 ` Kees Cook
2017-03-15 12:13 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-03-15 21:55 ` David Miller
2017-03-28 20:49 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-03-29 0:00 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-03-30 14:04 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-04-06 11:05 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-04-06 12:51 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-05-06 16:48 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-05-06 18:38 ` David Miller
2017-05-06 20:27 ` Shubham Bansal [this message]
2017-05-06 22:17 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-05-09 20:12 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-05-09 20:19 ` David Miller
2017-05-09 20:25 ` Daniel Borkmann
[not found] <CAHgaXdKsO2xoKYp7g91g+n+d_1KHSSByLjzBB-WjVXSjhB7qxw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20170510.212952.1440495072777358778.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <CAHgaXdK8LEEUPm4jTRRzCnjwdWAauHmmB=caZsSFY8MmStH89Q@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20170510.215218.2185526627014393313.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <CAHgaXdKZ_v+iO7uqEDx7PA7D+xcp1FngGvJ1SRSsGXNQ-iWWDQ@mail.gmail.com>
2017-05-11 9:32 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-05-11 15:30 ` Kees Cook
2017-05-13 21:38 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-05-15 17:44 ` Kees Cook
2017-05-15 19:55 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-05-20 20:01 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-05-22 13:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-05-22 17:04 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-05-22 20:05 ` Kees Cook
2017-05-23 2:58 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-05-23 4:27 ` Kees Cook
2017-05-22 18:58 ` Kees Cook
2017-05-22 19:08 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-05-23 3:34 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-05-23 4:22 ` Kees Cook
2017-05-23 5:03 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-05-23 5:35 ` Kees Cook
2017-05-23 18:39 ` Shubham Bansal
2017-05-23 19:32 ` Kees Cook
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-30 10:16 Shubham Bansal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHgaXd+2vF=d5zpWTg+a=vSnv2ZA+8LCR_MXT_MDKn4r2s8sig@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=illusionist.neo@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mgherzan@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).