From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 28/28] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 18:55:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHmME9ocfZuoXYxyw2q7f_Lo1yQOw1Y43LeexmS6BJAgeaST3A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20181006025709.4019-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20181006025709.4019-29-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <20181006235414.GA11773@lunn.ch> <CAHmME9ocMekP+jauihMGKq04to0_jQTjhv=r2wVEcqmLtKJu2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181007164807.GA21302@lunn.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181007164807.GA21302@lunn.ch>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Hi Andrew,

On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 6:48 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
> Hi Jason
>
> This is the sort of thing you should state in the patchset version
> history. It is O.K. to say i will address this later, but you need to
> communicate that. Otherwise reviewers just get frustrated that
> comments are getting repeatedly ignored and why should they bother
> reviewing it. And without reviewers willing to review your code, it
> will never get into mainline.

Understood. Sorry about that.

Jason