From: Aleksey Shumnik <ashumnik9@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, a@unstable.cc,
Thomas.Winter@alliedtelesis.co.nz
Subject: Re: [BUG] gre interface incorrectly generates link-local addresses
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:04:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJGXZLi7LedV_MYr==1RsN6goth73Y4txA=neci_QQcwa5Oqvw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230324153407.096d6248@kernel.org>
Dear maintainers,
I remind you that the problem is still relevant.
The problem is not only in generating the number of link-local
addresses in an amount equal to the number of addresses on all
interfaces defined in /etc/network/interfaces before the gre
interface.
Due to the new method of link-local address generation, the same
link-local address may be formed on several gre interfaces, which may
lead to errors in the operation of some network services
Would you please answer the following questions
> Which linux distribution did you use when you found an error with the
> lack of link-local address generation on the gre interface?
> After fixing the error, only one link-local address is generated?
Is this a bug or an expected behavior?
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:34 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Adding Thomas as well.
>
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 19:35:06 +0300 Aleksey Shumnik wrote:
> > Dear Maintainers,
> >
> > I found that GRE arbitrarily hangs IP addresses from other interfaces
> > described in /etc/network/interfaces above itself (from bottom to
> > top). Moreover, this error occurs on both ip4gre and ip6gre.
> >
> > Example of mgre interface:
> >
> > 13: mgre1@NONE: <MULTICAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1400 qdisc noqueue
> > state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
> > link/gre 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
> > inet 10.10.10.100/8 brd 10.255.255.255 scope global mgre1
> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> > inet6 fe80::a0a:a64/64 scope link
> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> > inet6 fe80::7f00:1/64 scope host
> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> > inet6 fe80::a0:6842/64 scope host
> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> > inet6 fe80::c0a8:1264/64 scope host
> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> >
> > It seems that after the corrections in the following commits
> > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/e5dd729460ca8d2da02028dbf264b65be8cd4b5f
> > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/30e2291f61f93f7132c060190f8360df52644ec1
> > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/23ca0c2c93406bdb1150659e720bda1cec1fad04
> >
> > in function add_v4_addrs() instead of stopping after this check:
> >
> > if (addr.s6_addr32[3]) {
> > add_addr(idev, &addr, plen, scope, IFAPROT_UNSPEC);
> > addrconf_prefix_route(&addr, plen, 0, idev->dev, 0, pflags,
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > it goes further and in this cycle hangs addresses from all interfaces on the gre
> >
> > for_each_netdev(net, dev) {
> > struct in_device *in_dev = __in_dev_get_rtnl(dev);
> > if (in_dev && (dev->flags & IFF_UP)) {
> > struct in_ifaddr *ifa;
> > int flag = scope;
> > in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl(ifa, in_dev) {
> > addr.s6_addr32[3] = ifa->ifa_local;
> > if (ifa->ifa_scope == RT_SCOPE_LINK)
> > continue;
> > if (ifa->ifa_scope >= RT_SCOPE_HOST) {
> > if (idev->dev->flags&IFF_POINTOPOINT)
> > continue;
> > flag |= IFA_HOST;
> > }
> > add_addr(idev, &addr, plen, flag,
> > IFAPROT_UNSPEC);
> > addrconf_prefix_route(&addr, plen, 0, idev->dev,
> > 0, pflags, GFP_KERNEL);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Moreover, before switching to Debian 12 kernel version 6.1.15, I used
> > Debian 11 on 5.10.140, and there was no error described in the commit
> > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/e5dd729460ca8d2da02028dbf264b65be8cd4b5f.
> > One link-local address was always generated on the gre interface,
> > regardless of whether the destination or the local address of the
> > tunnel was specified.
> >
> > Which linux distribution did you use when you found an error with the
> > lack of link-local address generation on the gre interface?
> > After fixing the error, only one link-local address is generated?
> > I think this is a bug and most likely the problem is in generating
> > dev->dev_addr, since link-local is formed from it.
> >
> > I suggest solving this problem or roll back the code changes made in
> > the comments above.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-24 16:35 [BUG] gre interface incorrectly generates link-local addresses Aleksey Shumnik
2023-03-24 22:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-06 15:04 ` Aleksey Shumnik [this message]
2023-04-06 22:59 ` Thomas Winter
2023-04-13 0:33 ` Thomas Winter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-02 13:01 Антарио Просперо
2024-02-07 22:05 ` Thomas Winter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJGXZLi7LedV_MYr==1RsN6goth73Y4txA=neci_QQcwa5Oqvw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ashumnik9@gmail.com \
--cc=Thomas.Winter@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=a@unstable.cc \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).