From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Control VF link state Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 16:27:57 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1368020717-22194-1-git-send-email-ogerlitz@mellanox.com> <1368113074.2653.2.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> <1368146064.4131.279.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <1369082231.4616.15.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> <519BEA6B.4080600@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Ben Hutchings , David Miller , Or Gerlitz , netdev@vger.kernel.org, amirv@mellanox.com, ronye@mellanox.com To: John Fastabend Return-path: Received: from mail-qe0-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]:49934 "EHLO mail-qe0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751906Ab3FIN16 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2013 09:27:58 -0400 Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id w7so709405qeb.18 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 06:27:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <519BEA6B.4080600@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:43 AM, John Fastabend wrote: > Either is fine if you prefer (2) that works for me. I'll get it working with ixgbe after you post it. So eventually I went on #1, you said you're OK with both... Or.