From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Nikolai Zhubr <zhubr.2@gmail.com>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: Realtek 8139 problem on 486.
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2021 11:10:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2=d0wT9UWgkKDJS5Bd8dPYswah79O5tAg5tHpr4vMH4Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60DF62DA.6030508@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 8:53 PM Nikolai Zhubr <zhubr.2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 24.06.2021 11:28, Arnd Bergmann:
> > Right, I forgot you saw that one WARN_ON trigger. If you enable KALLSYMS
> > and BUGVERBOSE, it should become obvious what that one is about.
>
> Here is new log with a better backtrace:
>
> https://pastebin.com/DP3dSE4w
Ok, I think the generic code changed a bit, but it does confirm that the
problem is doing the RX handing with IRQs disabled.
> The respective diff against regular 8139too.c is here:
>
> https://pastebin.com/v8kA7ZmX
>
> (Basically the same as you proposed initially, just slight difference
> might be as a remainder of my various previous testing)
The simplest workaround would be to just move the
"spin_lock_irqsave(&tp->lock, flags);" a few lines down, below the rx
processing. This keeps the locking rules exactly how they were before
your patch, and anything beyond that could be done as a follow-up
cleanup, if someone wants to think this through more.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-03 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-29 14:08 Realtek 8139 problem on 486 Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-29 18:42 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-05-29 21:44 ` tedheadster
2021-05-30 0:49 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-30 10:36 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-30 17:27 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-30 20:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-30 23:17 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-31 16:53 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-31 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-31 22:18 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-31 22:30 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-06-01 7:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-01 10:53 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-01 11:42 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-06-01 16:09 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-01 21:48 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-06-01 23:37 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-02 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-07 23:07 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-08 7:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-08 20:32 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-08 20:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-08 22:07 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-09 7:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-12 17:40 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-12 22:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-13 14:10 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-13 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-03 18:32 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-04 7:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-20 0:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-20 10:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-21 4:10 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-21 11:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-21 14:42 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-21 15:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-22 11:12 ` David Laight
2021-06-22 12:42 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-22 13:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-22 18:42 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-22 19:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-23 1:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-24 17:56 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-24 18:25 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-07-14 23:32 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-07-15 7:32 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-07-16 23:48 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-23 16:31 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-23 23:39 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-24 8:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-02 19:02 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-07-03 9:10 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2021-07-08 19:21 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-07-09 7:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-09 12:43 ` David Laight
2021-06-01 17:44 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-02 15:14 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-02 15:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-31 19:05 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-05-31 18:29 ` Denis Kirjanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK8P3a2=d0wT9UWgkKDJS5Bd8dPYswah79O5tAg5tHpr4vMH4Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhubr.2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).