From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
To: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: diag: support SOCK_DESTROY for UDP sockets
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 02:13:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0FM9YKHFTYMeYipvyTWDLoM8EvcxVpcYwAWFHQZuS+6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <417574bb-d15d-f347-d951-49d0eede02c0@cumulusnetworks.com>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:02 AM, David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>> Looking at the code again, it seems that there's a bug in
>> sock_diag_destroy. If the destroy operation does not occur (e.g., if
>> sock_diag_destroy returns EPERM, or the protocol doesn't support
>> destroy), then it doesn't release the refcount. This affects the TCP
>> code as well and as such is my fault, not yours. The most obvious way
>> to fix this might be to call sock_gen_put in sock_diag_destroy.
>
> sock_gen_put seems specific to tcp which is why I used sock_put here.
I thought sock_gen_put can be used on UDP as well, but it does seem a
bit counterintuitive.
> Perhaps better to have the callers of sock_diag_destroy handle the refcnt? This
> function took it; it should release it success or fail. Same for tcp.
So you'd remove the sock_put and sock_gen_put calls from tcp_abort and
just add one sock_gen_put in tcp_diag_destroy? That does seem simpler.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-23 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-23 15:02 [PATCH v3 net-next] net: diag: support SOCK_DESTROY for UDP sockets David Ahern
2016-08-23 15:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-23 15:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-23 16:37 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2016-08-23 17:02 ` David Ahern
2016-08-23 17:13 ` Lorenzo Colitti [this message]
2016-08-23 17:16 ` David Ahern
2016-08-23 17:24 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2016-08-23 17:54 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKD1Yr0FM9YKHFTYMeYipvyTWDLoM8EvcxVpcYwAWFHQZuS+6Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lorenzo@google.com \
--cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).