netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
To: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: diag: support SOCK_DESTROY for UDP sockets
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 02:13:31 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0FM9YKHFTYMeYipvyTWDLoM8EvcxVpcYwAWFHQZuS+6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <417574bb-d15d-f347-d951-49d0eede02c0@cumulusnetworks.com>

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:02 AM, David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>> Looking at the code again, it seems that there's a bug in
>> sock_diag_destroy. If the destroy operation does not occur (e.g., if
>> sock_diag_destroy returns EPERM, or the protocol doesn't support
>> destroy), then it doesn't release the refcount. This affects the TCP
>> code as well and as such is my fault, not yours. The most obvious way
>> to fix this might be to call sock_gen_put in sock_diag_destroy.
>
> sock_gen_put seems specific to tcp which is why I used sock_put here.

I thought sock_gen_put can be used on UDP as well, but it does seem a
bit counterintuitive.

> Perhaps better to have the callers of sock_diag_destroy handle the refcnt? This
> function took it; it should release it success or fail. Same for tcp.

So you'd remove the sock_put and sock_gen_put calls from tcp_abort and
just add one sock_gen_put in tcp_diag_destroy? That does seem simpler.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-23 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-23 15:02 [PATCH v3 net-next] net: diag: support SOCK_DESTROY for UDP sockets David Ahern
2016-08-23 15:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-23 15:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-23 16:37 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2016-08-23 17:02   ` David Ahern
2016-08-23 17:13     ` Lorenzo Colitti [this message]
2016-08-23 17:16       ` David Ahern
2016-08-23 17:24         ` Lorenzo Colitti
2016-08-23 17:54           ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKD1Yr0FM9YKHFTYMeYipvyTWDLoM8EvcxVpcYwAWFHQZuS+6Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lorenzo@google.com \
    --cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).