netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/11] bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 19:15:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKH8qBu9fMvhi7pOOKc35m8s5ckWT7M5SW5mupFTv-AzixwpFg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzYxHsB3D-HT7H1zZsSDEjz_cU7FpfgFnVVzbe5qA4=dYg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 4:24 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 3:55 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > We have two options:
> > 1. Treat all BPF_LSM_CGROUP the same, regardless of attach_btf_id
> > 2. Treat BPF_LSM_CGROUP+attach_btf_id as a separate hook point
> >
> > I was doing (2) in the original patch, but switching to (1) here:
> >
> > * bpf_prog_query returns all attached BPF_LSM_CGROUP programs
> > regardless of attach_btf_id
> > * attach_btf_id is exported via bpf_prog_info
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> > ---
> >  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   5 ++
> >  kernel/bpf/cgroup.c      | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  kernel/bpf/syscall.c     |   4 +-
> >  3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > index b9d2d6de63a7..432fc5f49567 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > @@ -1432,6 +1432,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
> >                 __u32           attach_flags;
> >                 __aligned_u64   prog_ids;
> >                 __u32           prog_cnt;
> > +               __aligned_u64   prog_attach_flags; /* output: per-program attach_flags */
> >         } query;
> >
> >         struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN command */
> > @@ -5911,6 +5912,10 @@ struct bpf_prog_info {
> >         __u64 run_cnt;
> >         __u64 recursion_misses;
> >         __u32 verified_insns;
> > +       /* BTF ID of the function to attach to within BTF object identified
> > +        * by btf_id.
> > +        */
> > +       __u32 attach_btf_func_id;
>
> it's called attach_btf_id for PROG_LOAD command, keep it consistently
> named (and a bit more generic)?
>
> >  } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> >
> >  struct bpf_map_info {
>
> [...]

SG. Making it generic makes sense.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-24  2:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-18 22:55 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: cgroup_sock lsm flavor Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/11] bpf: add bpf_func_t and trampoline helpers Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-20  0:45   ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21  0:03     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/11] bpf: convert cgroup_bpf.progs to hlist Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/11] bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-20  1:00   ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21  0:03     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 15:41       ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21  0:53   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  5:40       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 15:56         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  5:57       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/11] bpf: minimize number of allocated lsm slots per program Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-21  6:56   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24  2:14     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  5:53       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/11] bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-19  2:31   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-19 14:57   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-23 23:23   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2022-05-24  3:48   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 15:55     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24 17:50       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 23:45         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-25  4:03           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25  4:39             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-25 16:01               ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25 17:02                 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25 20:39                   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-25 21:25                     ` sdf
2022-05-26  0:03                       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-26  1:23                         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-26  2:50                           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-31 23:08                             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/11] bpf: allow writing to a subset of sock fields from lsm progtype Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/11] libbpf: implement bpf_prog_query_opts Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 23:22   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  3:45       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  4:01         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/11] libbpf: add lsm_cgoup_sock type Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 23:26   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/11] bpftool: implement cgroup tree for BPF_LSM_CGROUP Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/11] selftests/bpf: lsm_cgroup functional test Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/11] selftests/bpf: verify lsm_cgroup struct sock access Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 23:33   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  3:46       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-19 23:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: cgroup_sock lsm flavor Yonghong Song
2022-05-19 23:39   ` Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKH8qBu9fMvhi7pOOKc35m8s5ckWT7M5SW5mupFTv-AzixwpFg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).