From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: add CSUM_T_IP_GENERIC csum_type
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:13:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0Ucb6EO45+AxWAL8Vgwy4e7b=88TagW+xE-XizedOvmQEw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb59ed7c9c438bf076da3a956bb24fddf80978f7.1611218673.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:46 AM Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This patch is to extend csum_type field to 2 bits, and introduce
> CSUM_T_IP_GENERIC csum type, and add the support for this in
> skb_csum_hwoffload_help(), just like CSUM_T_SCTP_CRC.
>
> Note here it moves dst_pending_confirm field below ndisc_nodetype
> to avoid a memory hole.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/skbuff.h | 5 +++--
> net/core/dev.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 67b0a01..d5011fb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@
>
> #define CSUM_T_INET 0
> #define CSUM_T_SCTP_CRC 1
> +#define CSUM_T_IP_GENERIC 2
>
> /* Maximum value in skb->csum_level */
> #define SKB_MAX_CSUM_LEVEL 3
> @@ -839,11 +840,11 @@ struct sk_buff {
> __u8 vlan_present:1;
> __u8 csum_complete_sw:1;
> __u8 csum_level:2;
> - __u8 csum_type:1;
> - __u8 dst_pending_confirm:1;
> + __u8 csum_type:2;
> #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_NDISC_NODETYPE
> __u8 ndisc_nodetype:2;
> #endif
> + __u8 dst_pending_confirm:1;
>
> __u8 ipvs_property:1;
> __u8 inner_protocol_type:1;
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 3241de2..6d48af2 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -3617,11 +3617,20 @@ static struct sk_buff *validate_xmit_vlan(struct sk_buff *skb,
> int skb_csum_hwoffload_help(struct sk_buff *skb,
> const netdev_features_t features)
> {
> - if (unlikely(skb_csum_is_sctp(skb)))
> - return !!(features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC) ? 0 :
> - skb_crc32c_csum_help(skb);
> + if (likely(!skb->csum_type))
> + return !!(features & NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK) ? 0 :
> + skb_checksum_help(skb);
>
> - return !!(features & NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK) ? 0 : skb_checksum_help(skb);
> + if (skb_csum_is_sctp(skb)) {
> + return !!(features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC) ? 0 :
> + skb_crc32c_csum_help(skb);
> + } else if (skb->csum_type == CSUM_T_IP_GENERIC) {
> + return !!(features & NETIF_F_HW_CSUM) ? 0 :
> + skb_checksum_help(skb);
> + } else {
> + pr_warn("Wrong csum type: %d\n", skb->csum_type);
> + return 1;
> + }
Is the only difference between CSUM_T_IP_GENERIC the fact that we
check for NETIF_F_HW_CSUM versus using NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK? If so I
don't think adding the new bit is adding all that much value. Instead
you could probably just catch this in the testing logic here.
You could very easily just fold CSUM_T_IP_GENERIC into CSUM_T_INET,
and then in the checks here you split up the checks for
NETIF_F_HW_CSUM as follows:
if (skb_csum_is_sctp(skb))
return !!(features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC) ? 0 : skb_crc32c_csum_help(skb);
if (skb->csum_type) {
pr_warn("Wrong csum type: %d\n", skb->csum_type);
return 1;
}
if (features & NETIF_F_HW_CSUM)
return 0;
if (features & NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK) {
switch (skb->csum_offset) {
case offsetof(struct tcphdr, check):
case offsetof(struct udphdr, check):
return 0;
}
}
return skb_checksum_help(skb);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-21 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-21 8:45 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: add support for ip generic checksum offload for gre Xin Long
2021-01-21 8:45 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: rename csum_not_inet to csum_type Xin Long
2021-01-21 8:45 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: add CSUM_T_IP_GENERIC csum_type Xin Long
2021-01-21 8:45 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] ip_gre: add csum offload support for gre header Xin Long
2021-01-21 18:13 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2021-01-22 3:18 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: add CSUM_T_IP_GENERIC csum_type Xin Long
2021-01-22 16:17 ` Alexander Duyck
2021-01-22 2:50 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: rename csum_not_inet to csum_type Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-22 3:08 ` Xin Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKgT0Ucb6EO45+AxWAL8Vgwy4e7b=88TagW+xE-XizedOvmQEw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).