netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	 Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	 Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	nxne.cnse.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com,  bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: harden userspace-supplied &xdp_desc validation
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 22:02:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoAWf4sNkQzCBTE8S7VgH12NPyqwiYDiig+jv0KGYAhFTA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251008165659.4141318-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 12:59 AM Alexander Lobakin
<aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Turned out certain clearly invalid values passed in &xdp_desc from
> userspace can pass xp_{,un}aligned_validate_desc() and then lead
> to UBs or just invalid frames to be queued for xmit.
>
> desc->len close to ``U32_MAX`` with a non-zero pool->tx_metadata_len
> can cause positive integer overflow and wraparound, the same way low
> enough desc->addr with a non-zero pool->tx_metadata_len can cause
> negative integer overflow. Both scenarios can then pass the
> validation successfully.
> This doesn't happen with valid XSk applications, but can be used
> to perform attacks.
>
> Always promote desc->len to ``u64`` first to exclude positive
> overflows of it. Use explicit check_{add,sub}_overflow() when
> validating desc->addr (which is ``u64`` already).
>
> bloat-o-meter reports a little growth of the code size:
>
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 2/1 up/down: 60/-16 (44)
> Function                                     old     new   delta
> xskq_cons_peek_desc                          299     330     +31
> xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch               973    1002     +29
> xsk_generic_xmit                            3148    3132     -16
>
> but hopefully this doesn't hurt the performance much.

I don't see an evident point that might affect the performance. Since
you said that, I tested by running './xdpsock -i eth1 -t -S -s 64' and
didn't spot any degradation.

>
> Fixes: 341ac980eab9 ("xsk: Support tx_metadata_len")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.8+
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>

Thanks for the fix!

Reviewed-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

> ---
>  net/xdp/xsk_queue.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> index f16f390370dc..1eb8d9f8b104 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> @@ -143,14 +143,24 @@ static inline bool xp_unused_options_set(u32 options)
>  static inline bool xp_aligned_validate_desc(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
>                                             struct xdp_desc *desc)
>  {
> -       u64 addr = desc->addr - pool->tx_metadata_len;
> -       u64 len = desc->len + pool->tx_metadata_len;
> -       u64 offset = addr & (pool->chunk_size - 1);
> +       u64 len = desc->len;
> +       u64 addr, offset;
>
> -       if (!desc->len)
> +       if (!len)
>                 return false;
>
> -       if (offset + len > pool->chunk_size)
> +       /* Can overflow if desc->addr < pool->tx_metadata_len */
> +       if (check_sub_overflow(desc->addr, pool->tx_metadata_len, &addr))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       offset = addr & (pool->chunk_size - 1);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Can't overflow: @offset is guaranteed to be < ``U32_MAX``
> +        * (pool->chunk_size is ``u32``), @len is guaranteed
> +        * to be <= ``U32_MAX``.
> +        */
> +       if (offset + len + pool->tx_metadata_len > pool->chunk_size)
>                 return false;
>
>         if (addr >= pool->addrs_cnt)
> @@ -158,27 +168,42 @@ static inline bool xp_aligned_validate_desc(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
>
>         if (xp_unused_options_set(desc->options))
>                 return false;
> +

nit?

>         return true;
>  }
>
>  static inline bool xp_unaligned_validate_desc(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
>                                               struct xdp_desc *desc)
>  {
> -       u64 addr = xp_unaligned_add_offset_to_addr(desc->addr) - pool->tx_metadata_len;
> -       u64 len = desc->len + pool->tx_metadata_len;
> +       u64 len = desc->len;
> +       u64 addr, end;
>
> -       if (!desc->len)
> +       if (!len)
>                 return false;
>
> +       /* Can't overflow: @len is guaranteed to be <= ``U32_MAX`` */
> +       len += pool->tx_metadata_len;
>         if (len > pool->chunk_size)
>                 return false;
>
> -       if (addr >= pool->addrs_cnt || addr + len > pool->addrs_cnt ||
> -           xp_desc_crosses_non_contig_pg(pool, addr, len))
> +       /* Can overflow if desc->addr is close to 0 */
> +       if (check_sub_overflow(xp_unaligned_add_offset_to_addr(desc->addr),
> +                              pool->tx_metadata_len, &addr))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       if (addr >= pool->addrs_cnt)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       /* Can overflow if pool->addrs_cnt is high enough */
> +       if (check_add_overflow(addr, len, &end) || end > pool->addrs_cnt)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       if (xp_desc_crosses_non_contig_pg(pool, addr, len))
>                 return false;
>
>         if (xp_unused_options_set(desc->options))
>                 return false;
> +
>         return true;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-09 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-08 16:56 [PATCH bpf] xsk: harden userspace-supplied &xdp_desc validation Alexander Lobakin
2025-10-09 14:02 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2025-10-09 14:50   ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-10-09 14:27 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-10-09 15:05   ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-10-10  6:51   ` Jason Xing
2025-10-10 17:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAL+tcoAWf4sNkQzCBTE8S7VgH12NPyqwiYDiig+jv0KGYAhFTA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nxne.cnse.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).