From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 07/14] bpf: expand BPF syscall with program load/unload Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 17:19:24 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1403913966-4927-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <1403913966-4927-8-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "David S. Miller" , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Steven Rostedt , Daniel Borkmann , Chema Gonzalez , Eric Dumazet , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Linux API , Network Development , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" To: Alexei Starovoitov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1403913966-4927-8-git-send-email-ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > eBPF programs are safe run-to-completion functions with load/unload > methods from userspace similar to kernel modules. > > User space API: > > - load eBPF program > prog_id = bpf_prog_load(int prog_id, bpf_prog_type, struct nlattr *prog, int len) > > where 'prog' is a sequence of sections (currently TEXT and LICENSE) > TEXT - array of eBPF instructions > LICENSE - GPL compatible > + > + err = -EINVAL; > + /* look for mandatory license string */ > + if (!tb[BPF_PROG_LICENSE]) > + goto free_attr; > + > + /* eBPF programs must be GPL compatible */ > + if (!license_is_gpl_compatible(nla_data(tb[BPF_PROG_LICENSE]))) > + goto free_attr; Seriously? My mind boggles. --Andy