From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1983C433DB for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F6A64E0F for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232470AbhBQM25 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 07:28:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50826 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230473AbhBQM2z (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 07:28:55 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C47C061756 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:28:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id a7so2341188iok.12 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:28:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JMUXaRzFwOWedol+EImFcDzDlTmBKdoTouYSnwNtF9M=; b=Yh4VSut3xSEyRBAlkx90bCy3lDrJG+2wCcFvSjXhemw1twLAeObsXj6KyMUdnPhPKS fC+UAnjLMxCxMBuyiJO0At9FRNCPgLTXYeFef61yX8YLotqv5eaSvgYrE8vzX+ToWfVg EiDdlRUKwqqVyhL7vsyAnFIJROxueg5SH1oIZ3Fhk3708mXFALog0Xv3RAnKr4WhUkoo kfK3xC5e0+3YfBhKAp41qOh3hcNsxKg0dRhfCZ+lF7FpFuSQ0RpGE0JVs9jOOrPDTg96 xiXFGPlFGW2ktPLrWZmRqQmxgiSSsQOjaB359VilPQzzR3iNKfwgWiTJRirrPKzX7XpC v5Qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JMUXaRzFwOWedol+EImFcDzDlTmBKdoTouYSnwNtF9M=; b=qF2YGgTpq0MAdPiPYR24ywikbZL85XQdvNauhnQqqde3V1Fd0XhucsUDfS0ik3uwKd g/FAbLJMtx+LnkIZYh316S4bhex086MiMbhxztqdkGk73t647tmBngEuHwsbW0tTduW5 787rZVeZaRxMeT+banqQeCsHEmMSm/e36YFze+84D7irnfH9xiHuovo3K1WxAYPqaPOi X74LbCJuSJhtCRI+v15XpMAFEvMxKb+nEMX1a3L2cnX69TWGe+d20M1tUb0U9oJfcqMM hfQKsGe4EKDvzt5X2/zgi7GG+Qt6IEnJ1z7c1Q/sFaE1FWdOd+swon8goIdG6cGs2sWB vWSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WqYnRlvqbre5IHC6PwoZB0TQf+r9rAAFBjsGzgOv0kzINS//A ZzsUtaxXYyxLFAnDqKrwIabKuyWcA1+vdIMzgBc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwK4KR57ZCe+b6QYoBp9wFY60nQgX/H8MALhqetnPhuA35EWpVTULQF+m25UsAGxb2KNjANGLUM/Nehtfwt4G0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2bd6:: with SMTP id s22mr2210321iov.39.1613564894344; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:28:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210217062139.7893-1-dqfext@gmail.com> <20210217062139.7893-2-dqfext@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: DENG Qingfang Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:28:03 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/2] net: dsa: add Realtek RTL8366S switch tag To: Linus Walleij Cc: Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev , Mauri Sandberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 6:55 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > I suppose this switch can just use the existing RTL4 A tag > code after the recent patch so this one is not needed? No. Different protocol (0x9 instead of 0xA) and different xmit tag format (port bit mask instead of port number). Please take a closer look. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij