Re: [PATCH] net/sched: use spin_lock_bh() on &gact->tcf_lock

[Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>]

On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 2:36 AM Horatiu Vultur
<horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> The 10/05/2023 07:46, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> Hi Jamal,
>
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 5:01 AM Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jakub,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the reply,
> > >
> > > I inspected the code a bit more, it seems that the TC action is called from
> > > tcf_proto_ops.classify() callback, which is called from Qdisc_ops enqueue
> > > callback.
> > >
> > > Then Qdisc enqueue callback is from
> > >
> > > -> __dev_queue_xmit()
> > > -> __dev_xmit_skb()
> > > -> dev_qdisc_enqueue()
> > >
> > > inside the net core. It seems that this __dev_queue_xmit() callback is
> > > typically called from BH context (e.g.,  NET_TX_SOFTIRQ) with BH
> > > already disabled, but sometimes also can from a work queue under
> > > process context, one case is the br_mrp_test_work_expired() inside
> > > net/bridge/br_mrp.c. Does it indicate that this TC action could also be
> > > called with BH enable? I am not a developer so really not sure about it,
> > > as the networking code is a bit long and complicated.
> >
> > net/bridge/br_mrp.c seems to need some love +Cc Horatiu Vultur
> > <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> > Maybe that code needs to run in a tasklet?
> > In any case your patch is incorrect.
>
> I am currently out traveling and it would be a little bit hard for me to
> look at this right now. I can have a look after I come back in office
> around mid November.
> But I was wondering if this is stil an issue for MRP as Cong Wang
> pointed out, the function __dev_queue_xmit is already disabling the BH.

Yeah, sorry - should have read the code. Cong is right, there's
nothing for you to do.

cheers,
jamal

> >
> > cheers,
> > jamal
> >
>
> --
> /Horatiu