From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] sock: Move the socket inuse to namespace.
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:28:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMDZJNXPtcNf4zHjbkJWwfvToXt-i7mxfm5VDf+0FSR4ZFV_Hg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512667208.25033.13.camel@gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 08:45 -0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
>> In some case, we want to know how many sockets are in use in
>> different _net_ namespaces. It's a key resource metric.
>>
>
> ...
>
>> +static void sock_inuse_add(struct net *net, int val)
>> +{
>> + if (net->core.prot_inuse)
>> + this_cpu_add(*net->core.sock_inuse, val);
>> +}
>
> This is very confusing.
>
> Why testing net->core.prot_inuse for NULL is needed at all ?
>
> Why not testing net->core.sock_inuse instead ?
>
Hi Eric and Cong, oh it's a typo. it's net->core.sock_inuse there. Why
we should check the net->core.sock_inuse
Now show you the code:
cleanup_net will call all of the network namespace exit methods,
rcu_barrier, and then remove the _net_ namespace.
cleanup_net:
list_for_each_entry_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list)
ops_exit_list(ops, &net_exit_list);
rcu_barrier(); /* for netlink sock, the ‘deferred_put_nlk_sk’ will
be called. But sock_inuse has been released. */
/* Finally it is safe to free my network namespace structure */
list_for_each_entry_safe(net, tmp, &net_exit_list, exit_list) {}
Release the netlink sock created in kernel(not hold the _net_ namespace):
netlink_release
call_rcu(&nlk->rcu, deferred_put_nlk_sk);
deferred_put_nlk_sk
sk_free(sk);
I may add a comment for sock_inuse_add in v6.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-08 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-07 16:45 [PATCH v5 1/2] sock: Change the netns_core member name Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-07 16:45 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] sock: Move the socket inuse to namespace Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-07 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-12-07 21:28 ` Cong Wang
2017-12-08 5:28 ` Tonghao Zhang [this message]
2017-12-08 5:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-12-08 9:52 ` Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-08 11:29 ` Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-08 13:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-12-09 5:25 ` Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-08 22:09 ` Cong Wang
2017-12-09 5:27 ` Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-09 19:42 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMDZJNXPtcNf4zHjbkJWwfvToXt-i7mxfm5VDf+0FSR4ZFV_Hg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).