From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Bartek Kois <bartek.kois@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with queuing vlan tagged packets after migration from 3.16.0 to 4.9.0
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 19:30:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpU332Vrv5bZ10TYJ-crRUR0Y2yzgY41+eChs3hGJQzaoA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9cbb909-6514-138f-74dc-bb82cdbaa4b9@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 11:46 AM Bartek Kois <bartek.kois@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
> Yes it did work since I remember (like around 2.4.x) and it changed
> since I moved from Debian 8 to 9. I would appreciate fixing that in the
> future beacuse it is essential for queueing traffic on the routers, but
> the question is why these filters don`t work in that case:
>
> tc filter add dev $LAN_ETH parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 4 u32 match
> u32 0x0a000c08 0xffffffff at 20 classid 1:2001 # for 10.0.12.8 ip
> address
> tc filter add dev $LAN_ETH parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 4 u32 match
> u32 0x0a000c09 0xffffffff at 20 classid 1:2002 # for 10.0.12.9 ip
> address
> tc filter add dev $LAN_ETH parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 4 u32 match
> u32 0x0a000c10 0xffffffff at 20 classid 1:2003 # for 10.0.12.10 ip
> address
>
> I`ve changed "at 16" which works without vlan tags to "at 20" to take
> vlan tag into account.
Yeah, this confirms my speculation.
The problem is essentially a design flaw of u32 filter, the IP header
and TCP header offsets are never fixed, for example VLAN tagging and
IP options. What's more, it is not easy for user-space to learn the offset
for different packets as it requires to parse into each packets.
I don't know whether we can fix this either, VLAN call path probably
already makes assumptions on the current skb->data position, if
we "fix" it for u32, it would probably break other things.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-03 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-29 12:52 Problem with queuing vlan tagged packets after migration from 3.16.0 to 4.9.0 Bartek Kois
2018-12-30 18:53 ` Cong Wang
2018-12-30 21:14 ` Bartek Kois
2018-12-31 18:13 ` Bartek Kois
2019-01-01 19:33 ` Cong Wang
2019-01-01 19:46 ` Bartek Kois
2019-01-03 3:30 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2019-01-03 15:25 ` Bartek Kois
2019-01-03 20:44 ` Cong Wang
2019-01-04 18:11 ` Bartek Kois
2019-01-05 5:03 ` Cong Wang
2019-01-06 14:44 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-01-10 13:45 ` Simon Horman
2019-01-12 12:12 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-01-13 18:22 ` Cong Wang
2019-01-15 15:09 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-01-15 18:19 ` Cong Wang
2019-01-16 14:13 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-01-14 8:12 ` Simon Horman
2019-01-15 15:16 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-01-18 4:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-01-03 21:49 ` Anton Danilov
2019-01-04 7:07 ` Bartek Kois
2018-12-31 21:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-31 22:12 ` Bartek Kois
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAM_iQpU332Vrv5bZ10TYJ-crRUR0Y2yzgY41+eChs3hGJQzaoA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=bartek.kois@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).