From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: Latest net-next kernel 4.19.0+ Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:43:25 -0700 Message-ID: References: <59d5657c-ea0a-7b64-d5ff-5b55eb4fcccf@itcare.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers , Eric Dumazet , dmichail@google.com To: =?UTF-8?Q?Pawe=C5=82_Staszewski?= Return-path: Received: from mail-pl1-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]:38870 "EHLO mail-pl1-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726011AbeJ3LfJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 07:35:09 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f179.google.com with SMTP id p7-v6so4762805plk.5 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:43:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: (Adding Eric and Dimitris into Cc) On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 7:27 PM Cong Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 5:19 PM Pawe=C5=82 Staszewski wrote: > > > > Sorry not complete - followed by hw csum: > > > > [ 342.190831] vlan1490: hw csum failure > > [ 342.190835] CPU: 52 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/52 Not tainted 4.19.0+ #1 > > [ 342.190836] Call Trace: > > [ 342.190839] > > [ 342.190849] dump_stack+0x46/0x5b > > [ 342.190856] __skb_checksum_complete+0x9a/0xa0 > > [ 342.190859] tcp_v4_rcv+0xef/0x960 > > [ 342.190864] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x49/0xd0 > > [ 342.190866] ip_local_deliver+0x5e/0xe0 > > [ 342.190869] ? ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x50/0x50 > > [ 342.190870] ip_rcv+0x41/0xc0 > > [ 342.190874] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x4b/0x70 > > [ 342.190877] netif_receive_skb_internal+0x2f/0xd0 > > [ 342.190879] napi_gro_receive+0xb7/0xe0 > > [ 342.190884] mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe+0x7a/0xd0 > > [ 342.190886] mlx5e_poll_rx_cq+0xc6/0x930 > > [ 342.190888] mlx5e_napi_poll+0xab/0xc90 > > > We got exactly the same backtrace in our data center. However, > it is not easy for us to reproduce it, do you have any clue to reproduce = it? > > If you do, try to tcpdump the packets triggering this warning, it could > be useful for debugging. > > Also, we tried to apply commit d55bef5059dd057bd, the warning _still_ > occurs. We tried to revert the offending commit 88078d98d1bb, it > disappears. So it is likely that commit 88078d98d1bb introduces > more troubles than the one fixed by d55bef5059dd057bd.