From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] Add Common Applications Kept Enhanced (cake) qdisc Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 15:31:49 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20180429213439.7389-1-toke@toke.dk> <878t932ont.fsf@toke.dk> <4ec8da81-8671-f434-bada-27088b09ce7b@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= , Dave Taht , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Cake List To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:37748 "EHLO mail-pf0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750743AbeEAWcK (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2018 18:32:10 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id e9so6077396pfi.4 for ; Tue, 01 May 2018 15:32:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ec8da81-8671-f434-bada-27088b09ce7b@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > I guess that nobody really wants to really review Cake if > it is a file with 2700 lines of code and hundreds of variables/tunables. > > Sure, we have big files in networking land, as a result of thousands of changes. > > If you split it, then maybe the work can be split among reviewers as a result. > +1 At *least* split it into CAKE without ack-filter and ack-filter implementation.