From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack"
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:44:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpV0V23fndi6DOW1gu9kq+2UufHNrnfRYCME7uOOLCaX-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170110.131223.748150430551443881.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:12 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:06:01 -0800
>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:07:04 -0800
>>>
>>>> You really should come to netdev conferences so that you understand
>>>> goals and efforts, instead of living in your cave.
>>>
>>> I completely agree with Eric.
>>>
>>> Cong we have a very serious problem with you exactly because you make
>>> quite vicious emotional statements targetted at other developers
>>> merely when they say something you disagree with.
>>
>> What emotional? Pointing out Eris's words from 4 years ago is NOT
>> emotional, it is just a help.
>
> Saying "Facepalm" is emotional and has nothing to do with the
> technical issues.
Facepalm is heavily used on Internet:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facepalm#Internet_usage
it is how people including me react to disappointing. It is those
who only see facepalm make it irrelevant to the technical discussion
in this thread.
>
> You can keep showing us how expertly you can deflect the real
> issue we are discussion here, but that won't improve the situation
> at all I am afraid.
Of course, there are just too many people too lazy to do a google search:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2013/05/msg00500.html
>
>> Not everyone is as free to travel to Canada without a visa as you,
>> unfortunately.
>
> We hold netdev in other countries all over the world, stop making
> excuses.
The only countries you hold netdev are Canada, Japan and Spain
(to my knowledge). If you check:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_requirements_for_Chinese_citizens#Visa_requirements
It is very easy to find out if it is an excuse or a fact.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-10 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-09 15:03 [net-next PATCH 0/3] net: optimize ICMP-reply code path Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-09 15:04 ` [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-09 17:42 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-09 17:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-09 17:59 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-09 18:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-09 18:52 ` David Miller
2017-01-09 20:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-10 18:06 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-10 18:12 ` David Miller
2017-01-10 18:44 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2017-01-10 18:48 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-10 18:54 ` David Miller
2017-01-12 22:46 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-10 20:08 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-10 21:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-12 22:21 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-10 21:41 ` Joe Perches
2017-01-09 19:33 ` Joe Perches
2017-01-10 18:01 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-09 18:47 ` David Miller
2017-01-09 17:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-09 15:04 ` [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that gets rate limited Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-09 17:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-11 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-06-04 7:11 ` Florian Weimer
2017-06-04 14:38 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-06-05 14:22 ` Florian Weimer
2017-01-09 15:04 ` [net-next PATCH 3/3] net: for rate-limited ICMP replies save one atomic operation Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-09 17:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-09 17:43 ` [net-next PATCH 0/3] net: optimize ICMP-reply code path Cong Wang
2017-01-09 17:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-09 20:49 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAM_iQpV0V23fndi6DOW1gu9kq+2UufHNrnfRYCME7uOOLCaX-Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).