From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net_sched: move the empty tp check from ->destroy() to ->delete() Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:59:34 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1479952708-26763-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <5836A4D4.2010500@mellanox.com> <5836BD82.6080407@iogearbox.net> <5836C87E.8050506@mellanox.com> <58370558.9070004@iogearbox.net> <58396D71.8070703@iogearbox.net> <583A29E3.8030809@iogearbox.net> <583A6567.30003@mellanox.com> <583A7D67.50003@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Jiri Pirko , John Fastabend To: Roi Dayan Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]:33041 "EHLO mail-io0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755989AbcK2G74 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 01:59:56 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id j65so274698408iof.0 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:59:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <583A7D67.50003@mellanox.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Roi Dayan wrote: > Hi, > > I tested "[PATCH net] net, sched: respect rcu grace period on cls > destruction" and could not reproduce my original issue. > I rebased "[Patch net-next] net_sched: move the empty tp check from > ->destroy() to ->delete()" over to test it in the same tree and got into a > new trace in fl_delete. I will take care of this when I rebase my patch. Thanks for testing anyway.