From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [Patch net v2] ipv6: fix a potential deadlock in do_ipv6_setsockopt() Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:43:54 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1476945312-15572-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <1476971226.7065.5.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1477001458.7065.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers , Baozeng Ding , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:34891 "EHLO mail-it0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751605AbcJTXoP (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:44:15 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 4so203295843itv.0 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:44:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1477001458.7065.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > I used 'I wonder if' to say that we might have some better way to code > this test nowadays, but this can be done in a separate patch of course. OK, let's keep one bugfix in one patch. ;)