From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] net_sched: mirred: remove action when the target device is gone
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:14:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVYy0WJQrCd4ZB5EhGokj7qS5SoJSd-HBHiXey-DvF_Xw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B8C1D2.9070100@mojatatu.com>
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> wrote:
>
> No disrespect intended Cong - but lets just end this discussion agreeing
> to disagree. On my side I violently disagree. I hope not to spend any
> more energy on this.
>
Sorry, I think your argument on policy vs mechanism doesn't make
any sense at all. Therefore I don't accept it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-23 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-16 4:15 [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] net_sched: some cleanup and improvments Cong Wang
2013-12-16 4:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/8] net_sched: remove get_stats from tc_action_ops Cong Wang
2013-12-18 14:14 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-16 4:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] net_sched: act: use standard struct list_head Cong Wang
2013-12-18 14:22 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-16 4:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] net_sched: mirred: remove action when the target device is gone Cong Wang
2013-12-18 14:31 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-18 18:36 ` Cong Wang
2013-12-18 18:50 ` David Miller
2013-12-18 19:50 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-18 21:42 ` Cong Wang
2013-12-22 16:15 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-22 19:42 ` Cong Wang
2013-12-22 20:31 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-22 21:11 ` Cong Wang
2013-12-23 12:41 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-23 18:50 ` Cong Wang
2013-12-23 20:41 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-23 22:14 ` Cong Wang
2013-12-23 22:30 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-23 22:51 ` Cong Wang
2013-12-23 23:05 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-23 23:14 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2013-12-16 4:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/8] net_sched: cls: refactor out struct tcf_ext_map Cong Wang
2013-12-18 14:36 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-16 4:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/8] net_sched: init struct tcf_hashinfo at register time Cong Wang
2013-12-18 14:37 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-16 4:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/8] net_sched: convert tcf_hashinfo to hlist and use spinlock Cong Wang
2013-12-18 14:38 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-16 4:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 7/8] net_sched: convert tc_action_ops to use struct list_head Cong Wang
2013-12-18 14:40 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-16 4:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 8/8] net_sched: convert tcf_proto_ops " Cong Wang
2013-12-18 14:41 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-16 12:45 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] net_sched: some cleanup and improvments Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-17 21:30 ` David Miller
2013-12-18 13:21 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-18 14:13 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-12-18 18:51 ` David Miller
2013-12-18 21:40 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAM_iQpVYy0WJQrCd4ZB5EhGokj7qS5SoJSd-HBHiXey-DvF_Xw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).