From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] net_sched: mirred: remove action when the
 target device is gone
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:14:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVYy0WJQrCd4ZB5EhGokj7qS5SoJSd-HBHiXey-DvF_Xw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1387167311-14763-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
	<1387167311-14763-4-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
	<52B1B1B1.2060501@mojatatu.com>
	<CAM_iQpUDZa-=H53Csg8476xOL0xP+rn85O8eB1O39-eF_Jo+uw@mail.gmail.com>
	<52B1FC6D.7040005@mojatatu.com>
	<CAM_iQpWxCShCgiBrraJ3h9qzgVU82quq0E5vmFMSEcgEwSctJQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<52B71024.3090504@mojatatu.com>
	<CAM_iQpW9kUzip+p8fCkD4wH7KbAv8aR-Fqa0iRwPYdzk8+4Tqw@mail.gmail.com>
	<52B74C3A.1050900@mojatatu.com>
	<CAM_iQpXddH4qX2+-mY5gWLU19b6zjZzKV_RvQiyTT8sJ1sq-ow@mail.gmail.com>
	<52B82F80.8070902@mojatatu.com>
	<CAM_iQpUfKcS6RDmV_p+0tEgxx6Z2Y2k9m-VxxwwpL+PB0TX96Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<52B89FEB.9090503@mojatatu.com>
	<CAM_iQpWarY7kHNCtVdYqMVdADFbCUmDsAVQz1+iEx9JKsdZN5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<52B8B98C.7050200@mojatatu.com>
	<CAM_iQpXPLppL1E0d5nFfbM2hzd_-2+zqiU6zpN0b8Xo+XhVHCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<52B8C1D2.9070100@mojatatu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]:41661 "EHLO
	mail-ob0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752817Ab3LWXOR (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:14:17 -0500
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id wo20so6072578obc.11
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:14:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52B8C1D2.9070100@mojatatu.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> wrote:
>
> No disrespect intended Cong - but lets just end this discussion agreeing
> to disagree. On my side I violently disagree. I hope not to spend any
> more energy on this.
>

Sorry, I think your argument on policy vs mechanism doesn't make
any sense at all. Therefore I don't accept it.