From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>,
mlxsw@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net] net: sched: fix memleak for chain zero
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:40:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWZJ9VVD66h6RMNofobKyoFyztx2jYqBEHuE6_iAu7PNQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170906111419.5115-1-jiri@resnulli.us>
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>
> There's a memleak happening for chain 0. The thing is, chain 0 needs to
> be always present, not created on demand. Therefore tcf_block_get upon
> creation of block calls the tcf_chain_create function directly. The
> chain is created with refcnt == 1, which is not correct in this case and
> causes the memleak. So move the refcnt increment into tcf_chain_get
> function even for the case when chain needs to be created.
>
Your approach could work but you just make the code even
uglier than it is now:
1. The current code is already ugly for special-casing chain 0:
if (--chain->refcnt == 0 && !chain->filter_chain && chain->index != 0)
tcf_chain_destroy(chain);
2. With your patch, chain 0 has a different _initial_ refcnt with others.
3. Allowing an object (chain 0) exists with refcnt==0
Compare it with my patch:
1. No special-case for chain 0, the above ugly part is removed
2. Every chain is equal and created with refcnt==1
3. Any chain with refcnt==0 is destroyed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-06 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-06 11:14 [patch net] net: sched: fix memleak for chain zero Jiri Pirko
2017-09-06 17:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-09-06 17:40 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2017-09-06 20:33 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-06 23:37 ` Cong Wang
2017-09-07 6:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-08 2:18 ` David Miller
2017-09-09 18:46 ` Cong Wang
2017-09-10 14:03 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-11 23:43 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAM_iQpWZJ9VVD66h6RMNofobKyoFyztx2jYqBEHuE6_iAu7PNQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kubakici@wp.pl \
--cc=mlxsw@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).