Re: cross namespace interface notification for tun devices

[Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> By "notification" I assume you mean netlink notification.
>
> Yes, netlink notification.
>
>> The question is why does the process in A still care about
>> the device sitting in B?
>>
>> Also, the process should be able to receive a last notification
>> on IFF_UP|IFF_RUNNING before device is finally moved to B.
>> After this point, it should not have any relation to netns A
>> any more, like the device were completely gone.
>
> That's very clearly not the case with a tun device. Tun devices work
> by letting a userspace process control the inputs (ndo_start_xmit) and
> outputs (netif_rx) of the actual network device. This controlling
> userspace process needs to know when its own interface that it
> controls goes up and down. In the kernel, we can do this by just
> checking dev->flags&IFF_UP, and receive notifications on ndo_open and
> ndo_stop. In userspace, the controlling process looses the ability to
> receive notifications like ndo_open/ndo_stop when the interface is
> moved to a new namespace. After the interface is moved to a namespace,
> the process will still control inputs and ouputs (ndo_start_xmit and
> netif_rx), but it will no longer receive netlink notifications for the
> equivalent of ndo_open and ndo_stop. This is problematic.

Sounds like we should set NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL for tun
device.

What is your legitimate use case of send/receive packet to/from
a tun device in a different netns?