From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Colin Cross Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] af_unix: use freezable blocking calls in read Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 15:23:30 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1367458508-9133-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> <1367458508-9133-11-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> <20130503000812.GY19814@mtj.dyndns.org> <85487641.pdFCOjE3G7@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , lkml , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arve_Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , Oleg Nesterov , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Al Viro , "Eric W. Biederman" , Gao feng , netdev To: Tejun Heo Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Rafael. > > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> Heh, so you are aware of the deadlock possibilities. Good selection >>> of spots. For all the conversion patches. >>> >>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo >> >> I wonder if that includes [3/10] (just to get the record straight)? > > I think we want the lockdep annotations before these go in. I'll > review Colin's new series later today. Just to make sure the merge order is clear, the two patches I posted yesterday to reintroduce the lockdep warning in try_to_freeze() (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/3/488) need to be merged first, then I will repost this series on top of that one.