Re: [PATCH] ravb: Consolidate clock handling

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>]

Hi Simon,

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:24:53AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> The module clock is used for two purposes:
>>   - Wake-on-LAN (WoL), which is optional,
>>   - gPTP Timer Increment (GTI) configuration, which is mandatory.
>>
>> As the clock is needed for GTI configuration anyway, WoL is always
>> available.  Hence remove duplication and repeated obtaining of the clock
>> by making GTI use the stored clock for WoL use.
>
> Hi Geert,
>
> I understand from the statements above that the clock must be present,
> but I'm most sure that I understand why that means that WoL is always
> available.

That refers to the part below: WoL was considered available iff the clock
is available.

@@ -2073,10 +2058,11 @@ static int ravb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

        priv->chip_id = chip_id;

-       /* Get clock, if not found that's OK but Wake-On-Lan is unavailable */
        priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
-       if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
-               priv->clk = NULL;
+       if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
+               error = PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
+               goto out_release;
+       }

But the clock must always be available, else GTI configuration
would fail, and ravb initialization would return with an error.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds