From: Martin Kelly <martin@martingkelly.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Question about synchronize_net() in AF_PACKET close()
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 14:44:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN8CM3zo3bMxZV_UvywCPNjJrMwMA2-+POfY8cR429iodHRc+A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I have been reading the code in net/packet/af_packet.c in order to
optimize the runtime for raw socket close(). In certain cases, close()
can take a long time to return because of the synchronize_net()
overhead. In pursuit of speeding up close(), I have been testing a patch
that defers the socket buffer memory release via call_rcu() in order to
make close() return faster. However, I hit a tricky RCU question for
which I don't have the answer and wanted to know if any RCU/networking
experts could provide some guidance.
In net/packet/af_packet.c, I noticed the following few lines within
packet_release:
synchronize_net();
/*
* Now the socket is dead. No more input will appear.
*/
sock_orphan(sk);
sock->sk = NULL;
>From testing and code analysis, I have found that it appears to be safe
to move sock_orphan and sock->sk = NULL before the synchronize_net()
call like so:
/*
* Now the socket is dead. No more input will appear.
*/
sock_orphan(sk);
sock->sk = NULL;
synchronize_net();
Could some RCU and/or networking experts chime in about whether this a
safe operation? For all I know, there is some deep, fundamental reason
why those lines are in the order they are. On the other hand, perhaps
there is not.
Thanks,
Martin
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-09 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-09 21:44 Martin Kelly [this message]
2014-09-09 22:00 ` Question about synchronize_net() in AF_PACKET close() David Miller
2014-09-10 13:19 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2014-09-10 21:39 ` Martin Kelly
2014-09-10 21:37 ` Martin Kelly
2014-09-17 14:29 ` Martin Kelly
2014-09-17 14:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-17 17:04 ` Martin Kelly
2014-09-17 17:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-17 18:58 ` Martin Kelly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAN8CM3zo3bMxZV_UvywCPNjJrMwMA2-+POfY8cR429iodHRc+A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=martin@martingkelly.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).