From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Qing Huang <qing.huang@oracle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com>,
Tarick Bedeir <tarick@google.com>,
Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com>,
Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@oracle.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] mlx4_core: restore optimal ICM memory allocation
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 17:30:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+K3LS7+idPBOkcaBPBdBwz9tWCLqkzbWZA10W2mmR9hA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cd40c9e-16a5-ba96-db7c-3aafc5af0957@oracle.com>
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:08 PM Qing Huang <qing.huang@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/30/2018 1:50 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:30 PM Qing Huang <qing.huang@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/29/2018 9:11 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> Commit 1383cb8103bb ("mlx4_core: allocate ICM memory in page size chunks")
> >>> brought a regression caught in our regression suite, thanks to KASAN.
> >> If KASAN reported issue was really caused by smaller chunk sizes,
> >> changing allocation
> >> order dynamically will eventually hit the same issue.
> > Sigh, you have little idea of what your patch really did...
> >
> > The KASAN part only shows the tip of the iceberg, but our main concern
> > is an increase of memory overhead.
>
> Well, the commit log only mentioned KASAN and but the change here didn't
> seem to solve
> the issue.
Can you elaborate ?
My patch solves our problems.
Both the memory overhead and KASAN splats are gone.
>
> >
> > Alternative is to revert your patch, since we are now very late in 4.17 cycle.
> >
> > Memory usage has grown a lot with your patch, since each 4KB page needs a full
> > struct mlx4_icm_chunk (256 bytes of overhead !)
>
> Going to smaller chunks will have some overhead. It depends on the
> application though.
> What's the total increased memory consumption in your env?
As I explained, your patch adds 256 bytes of overhead per 4KB.
Your changelog did not mentioned that at all, and we discovered this
the hard way.
That is pretty intolerable, and is a blocker for us, memory is precious.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-30 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-30 4:11 [PATCH net] mlx4_core: restore optimal ICM memory allocation Eric Dumazet
2018-05-30 13:49 ` Tariq Toukan
2018-05-30 20:30 ` Qing Huang
2018-05-30 20:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-05-30 21:08 ` Qing Huang
2018-05-30 21:30 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-05-30 23:03 ` Qing Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANn89i+K3LS7+idPBOkcaBPBdBwz9tWCLqkzbWZA10W2mmR9hA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=danielj@mellanox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jsperbeck@google.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qing.huang@oracle.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
--cc=tarick@google.com \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
--cc=yanjun.zhu@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).