From: Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com>
To: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Cc: ovs-dev <ovs-dev@openvswitch.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Lance Richardson <lrichard@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Warren <ben@skyportsystems.com>,
Keith Holleman <holleman@skyportsystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] openvswitch: Trim off padding before L3 conntrack processing
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:05:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO_EM_mDa17fQx+--RDSyr1_qKSW7ZKxtt+p3J9yt23F8m_F1w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOrHB_CeoZ-MSmYNrMniccdTnT+VYUGEStq38CEi1HjtyGeJHA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com> wrote:
>> A short IPv4 packet may have up to 6 bytes of padding following the IP
>> payload when received on an Ethernet device.
>>
>> In the normal IPv4 receive path, ip_rcv() trims the packet to
>> ip_hdr->tot_len before invoking NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING hooks (including
>> conntrack). Then any subsequent L3+ processing steps, like
>> nf_checksum(), use skb->len as the length of the packet, rather than
>> referring back to ip_hdr->tot_len. In the IPv6 receive path, ip6_rcv()
>> does the same using ipv6_hdr->payload_len.
>>
>> In the OVS conntrack receive path, this trimming does not occur, so
>> the checksum verification in tcp_header() fails, printing "nf_ct_tcp:
>> bad TCP checksum". Extra zero bytes don't affect the checksum, but the
>> length in the IP pseudoheader does. That length is based on skb->len,
>> and without trimming, it doesn't match the length the sender used when
>> computing the checksum.
>>
>> With this change, OVS conntrack trims IPv4 and IPv6 packets prior to
>> L3 processing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com>
>> ---
>> net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>> index d558e882ca0c..3a7c9215c431 100644
>> --- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>> +++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>> @@ -1105,12 +1105,29 @@ int ovs_ct_execute(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> const struct ovs_conntrack_info *info)
>> {
>> int nh_ofs;
>> + unsigned int nh_len;
>> int err;
>>
>> /* The conntrack module expects to be working at L3. */
>> nh_ofs = skb_network_offset(skb);
>> skb_pull_rcsum(skb, nh_ofs);
>>
>> + /* Trim to L3 length since nf_checksum() doesn't expect padding. */
> Can you explore if nf_checksum can be changed to avoid the padding?
The nf_ip_checksum() and nf_ip6_checksum() helper functions can easily
be changed to avoid the padding.
My worry is that conntrack is just one of many netfilter hooks that
perform L3+ processing, and may assume that once skb->data points to
the L3 header, skb->len reflects the length of the L3 header and
payload. For example, in nf_conntrack_ftp.c, help() uses skb->len to
determine the length of the FTP payload and the TCP sequence number of
the next packet; this would be thrown off by lower-layer padding.
br_netfilter, a cousin of OVS, has always preserved this
assumption--like ip_rcv() and ip6_rcv(), br_validate_ipv4() and
br_validate_ipv6() trim the skb to the L3 length before they invoke
NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING hooks. Modifying OVS to fit the mold seems more
straightforward than changing this assumption.
>> + switch (skb->protocol) {
>> + case htons(ETH_P_IP):
>> + nh_len = ntohs(ip_hdr(skb)->tot_len);
>> + break;
>> + case htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
>> + nh_len = ntohs(ipv6_hdr(skb)->payload_len)
>> + + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + nh_len = skb->len;
>> + }
>> + err = pskb_trim_rcsum(skb, nh_len);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
> In case of error skb needs to be freed.
Thanks, I will fix this.
--Ed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-12 16:17 [PATCH] openvswitch: Trim off padding before L3 conntrack processing Ed Swierk
2017-12-14 0:58 ` Pravin Shelar
2017-12-14 20:05 ` Ed Swierk [this message]
2017-12-17 19:22 ` Pravin Shelar
2017-12-17 19:22 ` Pravin Shelar
2017-12-21 15:17 ` [PATCH v2] openvswitch: Trim off padding before L3+ netfilter processing Ed Swierk
2017-12-22 23:31 ` Pravin Shelar
2017-12-22 23:31 ` Pravin Shelar
2017-12-23 0:39 ` Ed Swierk
2017-12-23 0:39 ` Ed Swierk
2018-01-03 6:21 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-01-03 6:21 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-01-04 3:49 ` Ed Swierk
2018-01-05 3:36 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-01-05 18:14 ` Ed Swierk
2018-01-05 18:14 ` Ed Swierk
[not found] ` <CAO_EM_mQgURXZNtW7Qw7OkW4rjp4JWKBmqS8e4pUR=ZuiGCcZQ@mail.gmail.com>
2018-01-06 6:17 ` Pravin Shelar
[not found] ` <CAO_EM_=2qt3zSW1xprkLvcQVKGRTFMUQxCc4-cVLsUcRLj63Hg@mail.gmail.com>
2018-01-06 18:57 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-01-09 0:05 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-01-09 3:02 ` Ed Swierk
2018-01-09 3:02 ` Ed Swierk
2018-01-09 22:06 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-01-06 6:17 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-01-05 3:36 ` Pravin Shelar
2017-12-21 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND] " Ed Swierk
2017-12-21 15:21 ` Ed Swierk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAO_EM_mDa17fQx+--RDSyr1_qKSW7ZKxtt+p3J9yt23F8m_F1w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=eswierk@skyportsystems.com \
--cc=ben@skyportsystems.com \
--cc=holleman@skyportsystems.com \
--cc=lrichard@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ovs-dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).