From: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz>
To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: Re: netns_id in bpf_sk_lookup_{tcp,udp}
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:54:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOftzPidHn+hWsYY5UMRHaD35t_+bu6Amy2dZOS8DwGFFwNMkg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55816e4b-1a00-a1f3-6514-f755b992a049@6wind.com>
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 12:29, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> wrote:
>
> Le 19/11/2018 à 20:54, David Ahern a écrit :
> > On 11/19/18 12:47 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> >> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 10:39, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 11/19/18 11:36 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> >>>> Hi David, thanks for pointing this out.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is more of an oversight through iterations, the runtime lookup
> >>>> will fail to find a socket if the netns value is greater than the
> >>>> range of a uint32 so I think it would actually make more sense to drop
> >>>> the parameter size to u32 rather than u64 so that this would be
> >>>> validated at load time rather than silently returning NULL because of
> >>>> a bad parameter.
> >>>
> >>> ok. I was wondering if it was a u64 to handle nsid of 0 which as I
> >>> understand it is a legal nsid. If you drop to u32, how do you know when
> >>> nsid has been set?
> >>
> >> I was operating under the assumption that 0 represents the root netns
> >> id, and cannot be assigned to another non-root netns.
> >>
> >> Looking at __peernet2id_alloc(), it seems to me like it attempts to
> >> find a netns and if it cannot find one, returns 0, which then leads to
> >> a scroll over the idr starting from 0 to INT_MAX to find a legitimate
> >> id for the netns, so I think this is a fair assumption?
> The NET_ID_ZERO trick is used to manage nsid 0 in net_eq_idr() (idr_for_each()
> stops when the callback returns != 0).
>
> >>
> >
> > Maybe Nicolas can give a definitive answer; as I recall he added the
> > NSID option. I have not had time to walk the code. But I do recall
> > seeing an id of 0. e.g, on my dev box:
> > $ ip netns
> > vms (id: 0)
> >
> > And include/uapi/linux/net_namespace.h shows -1 as not assigned.
> Yes, 0 is a valid value and can be assigned to any netns.
> nsid are signed 32 bit values. Note that -1 (NETNSA_NSID_NOT_ASSIGNED) is used
> by the kernel to express that the nsid is not assigned. It can also be used by
> the user to let the kernel chooses a nsid.
>
> $ ip netns add foo
> $ ip netns add bar
> $ ip netns
> bar
> foo
> $ ip netns set foo 0
> $ ip netns set bar auto
> $ ip netns
> bar (id: 1)
> foo (id: 0)
OK, I'll fix this up then.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-20 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-19 3:26 netns_id in bpf_sk_lookup_{tcp,udp} David Ahern
2018-11-19 18:36 ` Joe Stringer
2018-11-19 18:39 ` David Ahern
2018-11-19 19:47 ` Joe Stringer
2018-11-19 19:54 ` David Ahern
2018-11-19 20:28 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2018-11-19 20:54 ` Joe Stringer [this message]
2018-11-19 21:59 ` Joe Stringer
2018-11-19 23:46 ` David Ahern
2018-11-20 9:05 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2018-11-20 15:46 ` David Ahern
2018-11-20 16:03 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2018-11-21 5:12 ` David Ahern
2018-11-21 9:44 ` [PATCH iproute2] ipnetns: parse nsid as a signed integer Nicolas Dichtel
2018-11-21 17:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOftzPidHn+hWsYY5UMRHaD35t_+bu6Amy2dZOS8DwGFFwNMkg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=joe@wand.net.nz \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).