From: ByeoungWook Kim <quddnr145@gmail.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Chaoming Li <chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rtlwifi: Fix improve function 'rtl_addr_delay()' in core.c
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 18:18:08 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOxTRzos-iFb5DCKzyz0y_XZgtsLi4uxhxH_3m_vaKrtLBZzjw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160203085603.GA9640@sudip-pc>
Hi Sudip,
This patch is exsisted depencency like next.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=145447963305712&w=2
I wrote review and the followup patch.
but i seem to that don't write a Cc document.
Sorry for your confused.
Regards,
Byeoungwook.
2016-02-03 17:56 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:21:46PM +0900, Byeoungwook Kim wrote:
>> Conditional codes in rtl_addr_delay() were improved in readability and
>> performance by using switch codes.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Byeoungwook Kim <quddnr145@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> How you are using Signed-off-by: of Fengguang Wu?
>
> did i missed seeing any mail from Fengguang in your previous versions?
>
> regards
> sudip
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-03 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-03 5:21 [PATCH v3] rtlwifi: Fix improve function 'rtl_addr_delay()' in core.c Byeoungwook Kim
2016-02-03 8:56 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-02-03 9:18 ` ByeoungWook Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOxTRzos-iFb5DCKzyz0y_XZgtsLi4uxhxH_3m_vaKrtLBZzjw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=quddnr145@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=julian.calaby@gmail.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).