netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ani Sinha <ani@aristanetworks.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <danborkmann@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org,
	Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@aristanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] vlan tagged packets and libpcap breakage
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:07:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOxq_8NTCV_ORimfet5FO0tH=9HQUy9Gy=ZeV9sFoWDAP8XagA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD6jFUTht82HOjGjDU7hFCEWyE3TOx_W4_j=SZK-DrcGfrio-A@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Daniel Borkmann
<danborkmann@iogearbox.net> wrote:

> Well, not everyone on netdev might be following this thread (resp.
> following fully). The best way to get responses for a patch is to go
> through the normal patch submission process on netdev, and if you like
> to request for comments, then mark it as RFC in the subject. This way,
> people will know and likely comment on it if it makes sense or not.

OK good to know.

> As Eric mentioned earlier, for now there seems not to be a reliable
> way to get to know which ops are present and which not. It's not
> really nice, but if you want to make use of those new (ANC*) features,
> probably checking kernel version might be the only way if I'm not
> missing something. Now net-next is closed, but if it reopens, I'll
> submit a version 2 of my patch where you've been CC'd to. If it gets
> in, then at least it's for sure that since kernel <xyz> this kind of
> feature test is present.

thanks, yes, I believe we do need some sort of validation on the
ancilliary features.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-13 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAOxq_8Nd8VP3MaNBfUt9v82nmGDpxZz5_5QMdsruET1tjwuQPw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <3246.1351717319@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
2012-10-31 21:50   ` [tcpdump-workers] vlan tagged packets and libpcap breakage Ani Sinha
2012-10-31 22:20     ` Guy Harris
2012-10-31 22:35       ` Ani Sinha
2012-11-01  0:50         ` [tcpdump-workers] " Guy Harris
2012-11-01  1:22           ` Ani Sinha
2012-12-06 21:20           ` Ani Sinha
2012-11-02 16:13       ` Bill Fenner
2012-11-13 22:41         ` Ani Sinha
2012-11-13 22:42           ` [tcpdump-workers] " Ani Sinha
2012-11-14 18:58           ` Michael Richardson
2012-10-31 22:42     ` [tcpdump-workers] " Michael Richardson
2012-12-12 21:53       ` Ani Sinha
2012-12-12 22:16         ` Ani Sinha
2012-12-13  8:35         ` [tcpdump-workers] " Daniel Borkmann
2012-12-13 17:34           ` Ani Sinha
2012-12-13 21:49             ` Daniel Borkmann
2012-12-13 22:07               ` Ani Sinha [this message]
2012-12-17  9:50               ` David Laight
2012-12-17 10:35                 ` Guy Harris
2012-12-17 11:08                   ` Daniel Borkmann
2012-12-17 19:49                   ` [tcpdump-workers] " Ani Sinha
2012-11-16  6:51     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-17 22:14       ` Michael Richardson
2012-11-17 23:16         ` Daniel Borkmann
2012-11-17 23:37           ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-17 23:33         ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-12-06 21:22           ` Ani Sinha
2012-12-06 22:19             ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-12-06 22:40               ` Ani Sinha
2012-12-07  0:55               ` Ani Sinha
2012-12-07  1:03                 ` [tcpdump-workers] " Eric W. Biederman
2012-12-07  1:28                   ` Ani Sinha
2012-12-07  1:31                   ` Ani Sinha
2012-12-07  1:41                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-12-07  1:59                       ` Michael Richardson
2012-12-11  0:11                         ` [tcpdump-workers] " Ani Sinha
2012-12-11 22:36       ` Ani Sinha
2012-12-11 23:04         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-12-12  0:46           ` Ani Sinha
2012-12-12  0:50           ` [tcpdump-workers] " Ani Sinha
2012-12-11 23:12         ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOxq_8NTCV_ORimfet5FO0tH=9HQUy9Gy=ZeV9sFoWDAP8XagA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ani@aristanetworks.com \
    --cc=danborkmann@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=fruggeri@aristanetworks.com \
    --cc=mcr@sandelman.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).